We thank Pakinee Phromsiri, Brian Jencik, Jinghong (James) Tang, and Roger White for their comments on the manuscript. We thank Patrick Oakes, Stefano Di Talia, and Victoria Deneke for sharing their expertise on how to perform PIV analysis. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants F31 HD100127 (to M. D. K.) and R01 GM102155 (to M. A. W).

<ol>
	<li>Chowdhary, S., Tomer, D., Dubal, D., Sambre, D., Rikhy, R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Analysis+of+mitochondrial+organization+and+function+in+the+Drosophila+blastoderm+embryo.">Analysis of mitochondrial organization and function in the Drosophila blastoderm embryo.</a> Scientific Reports. 7 (1), 5502 (2017).</li><li>Mavor, L. M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Rab8+directs+furrow+ingression+and+membrane+addition+during+epithelial+formation+in+Drosophila+melanogaster.">Rab8 directs furrow ingression and membrane addition during epithelial formation in Drosophila melanogaster.</a> Development. 143 (5), 892-903 (2016).</li><li>Riggs, B., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Actin+cytoskeleton+remodeling+during+early+Drosophila+furrow+formation+requires+recycling+endosomal+components+Nuclear-fallout+and+Rab11.">Actin cytoskeleton remodeling during early Drosophila furrow formation requires recycling endosomal components Nuclear-fallout and Rab11.</a> Journal of Cell Biology. 163 (1), 143-154 (2003).</li><li>Welte, M. A., Gross, S. P., Postner, M., Block, S. M., Wieschaus, E. F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Developmental+regulation+of+vesicle+transport+in+Drosophila+embryos:+forces+and+kinetics.">Developmental regulation of vesicle transport in Drosophila embryos: forces and kinetics.</a> Cell. 92 (4), 547-557 (1998).</li><li>Welte, M. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=As+the+fat+flies:+The+dynamic+lipid+droplets+of+Drosophila+embryos.">As the fat flies: The dynamic lipid droplets of Drosophila embryos.</a> Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1851 (9), 1156-1185 (2015).</li><li>Deneke, V. E., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Self-organized+nuclear+positioning+synchronizes+the+cell+cycle+in+Drosophila+embryos.">Self-organized nuclear positioning synchronizes the cell cycle in Drosophila embryos.</a> Cell. 177 (4), 925-941 (2019).</li><li>Welte, M. A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Regulation+of+lipid-droplet+transport+by+the+perilipin+homolog+LSD2.">Regulation of lipid-droplet transport by the perilipin homolog LSD2.</a> Current Biology. 15 (14), 1266-1275 (2005).</li><li>Bailey, A. P., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Antioxidant+role+for+lipid+droplets+in+a+stem+cell+niche+of+Drosophila.">Antioxidant role for lipid droplets in a stem cell niche of Drosophila.</a> Cell. 163 (2), 340-353 (2015).</li><li>Johnson, M. R., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=H2Av+buffering+via+dynamic+sequestration+to+lipid+droplets+in+Drosophila+embryos.">H2Av buffering via dynamic sequestration to lipid droplets in Drosophila embryos.</a> Elife. 7, 36021 (2018).</li><li>Lowe, N., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Analysis+of+the+expression+patterns,+subcellular+localisations+and+interaction+partners+of+Drosophila+proteins+using+a+pigP+protein+trap+library.">Analysis of the expression patterns, subcellular localisations and interaction partners of Drosophila proteins using a pigP protein trap library.</a> Development. 141 (20), 3994-4005 (2014).</li><li>Rambold, A. S., Cohen, S., Lippincott-Schwartz, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Fatty+acid+trafficking+in+starved+cells:+regulation+by+lipid+droplet+lipolysis,+autophagy,+and+mitochondrial+fusion+dynamics.">Fatty acid trafficking in starved cells: regulation by lipid droplet lipolysis, autophagy, and mitochondrial fusion dynamics.</a> Developmental Cell. 32 (6), 678-692 (2015).</li><li>Rand, M. D., Kearney, A. L., Dao, J., Clason, T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Permeabilization+of+Drosophila+embryos+for+introduction+of+small+molecules.">Permeabilization of Drosophila embryos for introduction of small molecules.</a> Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 40 (11), 792-804 (2010).</li><li>Tran, S. L., Welte, M. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=In-vivo+centrifugation+of+Drosophila+embryos.">In-vivo centrifugation of Drosophila embryos.</a> Journal of Visualized Experiments. (40), (2010).</li><li>Rothwell, W. F., Sullivan, W. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Drosophila+embryo+collection.">Drosophila embryo collection.</a> CSH Protocols. 2007, (2007).</li><li>Wieschaus, E., N&#252;sslein-Volhard, C., Roberts, D. B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=.">.</a> Drosophila: A Practical Approach. , 179-214 (1998).</li><li>. The Interactive Fly: Stages of Development and Mitotic Domains Available from: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.sdbonline.org/sites/fly/aimain/2stages.htm">https://www.sdbonline.org/sites/fly/aimain/2stages.htm</a> (1999)</li><li>Liberzon, A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=.">.</a> OpenPIV/openpiv-python: OpenPIV - Python (v0.22.2) with a new extended search PIV grid option. , (2020).</li><li>Markow, T. A., Beall, S., Matzkin, L. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Egg+size,+embryonic+development+time+and+ovoviviparity+in+Drosophila+species.">Egg size, embryonic development time and ovoviviparity in Drosophila species.</a> Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 22 (2), 430-434 (2009).</li><li>Gross, S. P., Welte, M. A., Block, S. M., Wieschaus, E. F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Dynein-mediated+cargo+transport+in+vivo.+A+switch+controls+travel+distance.">Dynein-mediated cargo transport in vivo. A switch controls travel distance.</a> Journal of Cell Biology. 148 (5), 945-956 (2000).</li><li>Debarre, D., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Imaging+lipid+bodies+in+cells+and+tissues+using+third-harmonic+generation+microscopy.">Imaging lipid bodies in cells and tissues using third-harmonic generation microscopy.</a> Nature Methods. 3 (1), 47-53 (2006).</li><li>Dou, W., Zhang, D., Jung, Y., Cheng, J. X., Umulis, D. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Label-free+imaging+of+lipid-droplet+intracellular+motion+in+early+Drosophila+embryos+using+femtosecond-stimulated+Raman+loss+microscopy.">Label-free imaging of lipid-droplet intracellular motion in early Drosophila embryos using femtosecond-stimulated Raman loss microscopy.</a> Biophysical Journal. 102 (7), 1666-1675 (2012).</li><li>Barry, S. K., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Injecting+Gryllus+bimaculatus+Eggs.">Injecting Gryllus bimaculatus Eggs.</a> Journal of Visualized Experiments. (150), (2019).</li><li>Le Trionnaire, G., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=An+integrated+protocol+for+targeted+mutagenesis+with+CRISPR-Cas9+system+in+the+pea+aphid.">An integrated protocol for targeted mutagenesis with CRISPR-Cas9 system in the pea aphid.</a> Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 110, 34-44 (2019).</li></ol>

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

The Drosophila embryo is a powerful and convenient model to study fundamental questions in cellular and organismal biology. Its relative simplicity, powerful genetics, and small size make it an excellent system for imaging both cellular processes and development. Here, a standard microinjection protocol is adapted to enable FP usage in embryos. This approach allows for fluorescent imaging of specific cellular structures without the need for genetically encoded fluorophores, opening many genetic backgrounds to imaging. Combining multiple dyes plus strategically chosen fluorescently tagged proteins can open multichannel live imaging spanning the whole spectrum of visible light.
Critical steps in the protocol: 
This protocol uses BODIPY 493/503 to label LDs. This approach can easily be adapted to mark other cellular structures. For subsequent image analysis, one of the most important factors is the signal-to-noise ratio, i.e., the brightness of the dye compared to the background signal. Lysosomes have been successfully imaged (LysoTracker Red, 1 mM), as well as mitochondria (Mitoview 633, 200 &#181;M), the ER (ER tracker Green, 10 &#181;M), and microtubules (SiR tubulin, 200 nM in DMSO), as shown in Figure&#160;2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure&#160;5. In addition, yolk vesicles are autofluorescent and give off blue light upon UV excitation (image using 405 nm as the excitation wavelength (Figure 6)). For other dyes, aim for the dye concentration to be 100-1,000x of what would be needed for staining cultured cells live; this is similar to the concentration of a stock solution that would be diluted into cell culture media. As this protocol calls for an injection of 100 fL and the Drosophila embryo is roughly 9 nL in volume18, these dye concentrations will average out to an internal embryonic concentration of under 1/100th of what is present in the cell culture media. Temporarily, the local concentration will be higher at the site of injection, which is most relevant for FPs that do not diffuse well (i.e., mitochondrial dyes and SiR-tubulin). For these FPs, start at the recommended high concentrations; if unexpected death is observed, successively dilute two-fold until an acceptable compromise between survival and signal strength is reached.
When co-injecting multiple dyes, both dyes should either be in the same solvent, or both the solvents and dyes should be compatible with the mixture (alcohol concentrations exceeding ~10% are not recommended).
The quality of the needles is essential for the success of this procedure, as the tip needs to be as fine as possible. Otherwise, damage from the injection wound can compromise the subsequent development of the embryo. As commercial needle pullers differ, it is important to follow the suggestions of the manufacturer and try out multiple pulling parameters until the desired shape is achieved. It is critical to perform the quality control step 1.1.3 as working with a cracked, jagged, or large bore needle tip will make the successful injection more difficult or even impossible.
The embryo needs to be partially desiccated so that additional volumes of liquid can be added during the injection. If the embryo is under-desiccated, the needle will not enter easily, and cytoplasm will squirt out as the needle penetrates or as the solution is injected. If the embryo is over-desiccated, it will look deflated and will not develop properly. The exact drying time depends on local conditions, e.g., air humidity, and can change from day to day. It has to be determined empirically for each session.
The ability of the embryo to survive after microinjection depends critically on the quality of the needle, proper desiccation, and limiting injection volume to less than 1 pL (ideally 100 fL). As long as these parameters are optimized, no significant toxicity is apparent when the described dyes are injected at the recommended concentrations. If embryos survive the desiccation and injection steps, they typically develop successfully well into germ-band extension, an exception being the microtubule and ER probes which caused cellularization defects at high levels (100 fL injection of the stock concentration of each). Testing found no obvious developmental defects when DMSO, water, and mixtures of the two were injected at the recommended volumes, with an embryo survival rate through germ-band extension of ~75% or more. Injection volumes more than over 1 pL caused defects and embryos injected with ~4 pL volumes developed for less than 1 h. Therefore, injection volumes need to be kept low, which means that dye concentrations have to be high.
Generally, injections along the lateral edge of the embryo are recommended as those result in the least damage. However, the injection site may need to be adjusted depending on the diffusive properties of the FPs employed. BODIPY 493/503 and LysoTracker diffuse faster across the entire embryo than Lipid Spot 610 (another dye to mark LDs), while SiR-Tubulin and Mitoview 633 never diffuse fully across the embryo (imaging as late as 7 h post-injection). Thus, injection in or near the site of interest may be necessary. When injecting in the anterior or posterior regions, a particularly fine needle is recommended.
Image acquisition relies on confocal microscopy to optically section and resolve small organelles and all cytoskeletal components. Techniques requiring analysis of many images (e.g., STORM or PALM) will not work because the embryonic contents are in motion and the fluorophores are not optimized for photoswitching. Epifluorescence microscopy lacks the lateral and axial resolution to make out most organelles and smaller cellular structures. For these reasons, it is strongly recommended to use a confocal microscope or employ light sheet technology.
The reproducibility of the image analysis relies greatly on consistent imaging data. For the greatest chance of success, optimization of the injection technique and image acquisition is required. Establishing and practicing a technique where the dye(s) of interest, site of injection, age of the embryo, injection volume, and acquisition setup are all consistent will generate the most robust data for image analysis.
Modifications and troubleshooting of the method 
This protocol demonstrates a method for analyzing the bulk flow of LDs in cleavage stage embryos using particle image velocimetry. The same approach can be used for other organelles, other developmental stages, and other analysis methods. For example, Figure 2 shows analysis of LDs and acidic organelles flowing in the syncytial stages of embryogenesis, visualized by co-injecting BODIPY 493/503 and LysoTracker Red. Further successful imaging of LD motion in embryos up to 7 h post-fertilization has been achieved; these embryos do retain the injection wound but are able to develop for several hours.
Data gathered using this protocol has been used for particle image velocimetry, but many other analysis techniques are available. For example, particle tracking programs like those found in ImageJ, Imaris, or manual tracking can be used to obtain velocities and directionalities of moving structures. Note that most such tracking software are built to work with data from planar cell culture systems and do not always adapt well to 3D structures like the Drosophila embryo. Further, for the generation of the best quality particle tracking data, multiple Z planes would need to be imaged; this should be feasible if image stack acquisition times are under ~2 s. This benchmark should be reachable on spinning disc confocal, lattice light sheet, and recent laser scanning confocal systems. However, the feasibility of particle tracking for abundant organelles such as LDs, mitochondria, and lysosomes is low as the amount of positive signal in a field of view is too high for the current tracking methods. Tracking of less abundant structures like nuclei or yolk vesicles may be possible. PIV for flow analysis works well for LDs and acidic organelles in cleavage stages because both organelles move freely. Organelles like nuclei, ER, and mitochondria are tethered to other cellular structures and thus do not move freely and are not suited to software analysis that assumes free motion. The investigator should pick the techniques best suited to the organelle of interest.
During the syncytial and cellular blastoderm stages, LDs (as well as some other organelles) move along radially oriented microtubules5. It is therefore possible to find cross-sectional views (like in Figure 5) where single microtubules are in focus for long distances, allowing particle tracking in 2D. Since these optical planes are deep within the embryo, overall signal strength is diminished, and the signal-to-noise ratio is reduced.
For tracking analysis, imaging as fast as possible can reveal crucial details of the motion and thus of the motile machinery. For example, lipid-droplet motion is a mixture of two motile states, slow-short motion (~200 nm/s; average travel distance ~100 nm) and fast-long motion (~450 nm/s; average travel distance ~1,000 nm)19; thus, if images are taken every second or even less frequently, the slow-short state becomes undetectable. However, frequent imaging also induces fluorophore bleaching and phototoxicity. Imaging conditions, therefore, have to be adjusted depending on the exact question to be addressed.
Limitations of the method 
Depending on the dye desired, the method can be limited by the compatibility between the dye solubility and the toxicity of the injection solution. Alcohols like isopropanol and ethanol are difficult to handle within a needle due to their lower viscosity and appear to damage cellular components and kill the embryo.
The method is also not well suited for visualizing the earliest steps in embryogenesis because it takes 30+ min to prepare the embryos for injection. At room temperature, the initial cell cycles of the embryo are just ~10 min long each; so, even if one were to pick a newly fertilized egg in step 5.2.3, the first few cell cycles would already be completed by the time the embryo is ready for imaging.
Illumination with light in the UV/blue range is considerably more phototoxic than for longer wavelengths. Under such conditions (e.g., to follow autofluorescent yolk vesicles; Figure 6), one has to limit imaging time (leading to shorter time series) or use lower laser power (resulting in a reduced signal-to-noise ratio).
After cellularization, dyes injected in a specific location tend to diffuse poorly, as they must traverse many cell membranes. This limits the region of observation in later developmental stages.
The significance of the method with respect to existing/alternative methods 
The motion of LDs and other lipid-containing organelles in early embryos can be visualized with genetically encoded fluorophores, label-free techniques, and by the introduction of FPs. The latter can be achieved by permeabilization of the vitelline membrane12 or the microinjection approach discussed here.
Genetically encoded fluorophores are versatile markers whose levels are typically highly reproducible from embryo to embryo. However, they have lower quantum yields and bleach more easily than FPs. Typically, they are only available in one or two tagged version(s) (e.g., GFP or mCherry), limiting the choice of which structures can be imaged simultaneously. FPs, on the other hand, often exist in a large variety; for example, various lipid-droplet specific dyes are available with emission spectra from Autodot in the UV/blue spectrum to Lipidtox and LipidSpot 610 in the far-red spectrum. FPs can also be directly applied to any strain of interest, and thus do not require strain construction to, for example, introduce the desired organelle marker into a mutant strain of interest. This advantage is particularly pronounced when multiple structures are to be labeled simultaneously; instead of time-consuming crosses spanning multiple generations, this can be achieved in a single day by mixing the relevant dyes and introducing them at the same time. Finally, if cellular processes are to be probed with pharmacological inhibition, drugs and dyes can be introduced together.
Label-free methods are very powerful approaches for detecting specific cellular structures. For example, LDs can be specifically detected in early embryos by third-harmonic generation microscopy20 or by femtosecond Stimulated Raman Loss microscopy21. Like FPs, these approaches can be applied in any genetic background, and because they do not cause bleaching, they potentially allow for faster image acquisition. However, they are typically limited to specific organelles and thus do not by themselves support multiplex imaging; they also require specialized microscopes.
There are two general strategies for introducing small molecules into embryos. One is the microinjection approach employed here; the other is chemical (terpene) treatment to permeabilize the vitelline membrane. The latter approach12 is less involved than microinjection, but also more variable from embryo to embryo. In addition, after permeabilization, the protection provided by the vitelline membrane is compromised and the embryo proper is accessible to the external medium, making it more challenging to keep it alive. Microinjection is much less likely to derail embryonic development than permeabilization. However, permeabilization is recommended if many embryos need to be monitored simultaneously, e.g., for drug screening purposes. To follow the movement of cellular structures and obtain reproducible image series suitable for image analysis, microinjection is the method of choice.
Importance and potential applications of the method in specific research areas 
The Drosophila embryo is an important model system for studying many cell-biological and developmental processes1,5,6. Tagging organelles with fluorescent proteins has made major contributions to the understanding of how the early embryo develops, how various organelles traffic, and how such trafficking is modulated developmentally and genetically. However, their propensity to bleach and the challenges of generating strains in which multiple organelles are labeled with different colors limit the application of this approach. The use of FPs introduced by microinjection solves many of these challenges and can even be combined with fluorescently tagged proteins. This technique allows for the imaging of multiple organelles, cell structures, and cytoskeletal components in any genetic background. As a result, several genotypes can be compared via live imaging, making it possible to determine the effect of mutations on the trafficking of multiple organelles.
This protocol demonstrates the FP injection approach for embryos of Drosophila melanogaster, but in principle, this approach applies to any insect eggs for which microinjection techniques have been established, including other species of Drosophila, crickets22, and aphids23.

Vital dyes and molecular probes are powerful tools to image specific cellular structures and organelles live. In the Drosophila embryo, many different organelles display cytoskeleton-driven localization1,2,3,4, but the application of these small molecules is challenging because the eggshell is impermeable to many of them. This protocol describes a method to use fluorescent probes (FPs) in live embryos via microinjection in order to detect large-scale trafficking of organelles. The procedure covers preparation of the injection solution, egg collection and preparation of embryos, microinjection, imaging, and image analysis.
Dramatic spatial rearrangements of organelles are common in many animal oocytes, eggs, and embryos, in part because of the large size of these cells. In the Drosophila embryo, for example, lipid droplets (LDs) and yolk vesicles move toward the embryo center just before cellularization5. This motion depends on microtubules and leaves a ~40 &#181;m region all around the periphery of the embryo depleted of the two organelles. During earlier cleavage stages, many organelles are transported by cytoplasmic flows that are driven by actin-myosin-based contractions at the embryo surface6. Although the embryos of many species exhibit similar rearrangements, the Drosophila embryo is particularly suited for following these processes by imaging because it develops externally at standard laboratory &#39;room temperature&#39;, is relatively transparent, small enough to fit on most microscope setups, and can be manipulated using powerful genetic tools.
For some organelles, fluorescently tagged proteins are available that specifically label these structures. For example, LSD-2 (also known as dPLIN2) is a protein that in embryos specifically targets LDs7. Fly lines are available that carry either inducible transgenes encoding a fusion between Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) and LSD-28 or a gene trap in which yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) is inserted into the coding region of the endogenous LSD-2 gene9,10. However, this approach has limitations, including that these fusion proteins have low quantum yields and tend to bleach easily. In addition, labeling multiple different structures simultaneously can be challenging: for many organelles, only one type of fluorescent tag (often GFP or mCherry) is currently available, so imaging two organelles at the same time may require new transgenes or insertions; also, even if compatible tags are available, introducing them into a single strain can require time-consuming crosses. It also makes using the many powerful genetic resources less convenient, e.g., if two organelle markers, a Gal4 driver, and an inducible RNAi construct all have to be present in the same mother.
In principle, these limitations can be overcome with the use of FPs, including vital dyes (e.g., LysoTracker to mark lysosomes), molecular probes (e.g., SiR-tubulin to label microtubules), and fluorescently labeled biological molecules (e.g., C12 BODIPY to probe fatty acid metabolism11). From use in cultured cells, they are typically well-validated as powerful tools for probing cellular biology. FPs are versatile, have superior photo properties, and are compatible with fluorescent proteins. Multiple dyes can be mixed and applied simultaneously, often with the benefits of separation into the violet/blue and far-red areas of the spectrum and small Stokes shifts, preventing channel bleed through. Small Stokes shifts allow for simultaneous capture of multiple imaging channels, enabling the tracking of several organelles at once. Finally, they can equally be applied to labeling organelles in the embryos of other Drosophila species or even other insects where no fluorescently tagged proteins may be available.
However, most of these FPs cannot traverse the elaborate eggshell of the Drosophila embryo. It consists of five layers: three outer chorionic layers (chorion) that prevent mechanical damage plus a waxy layer surrounding the vitelline membrane that creates a chemical barrier12. For simplicity, the combination of the waxy layer and the vitelline membrane will be referred to as the &#34;vitelline membrane&#34; below. To bypass the eggshell, this protocol adapts an established embryo microinjection approach to introduce FPs into the Drosophila embryo. The protocol describes how to monitor the cytoplasmic flow of LDs in cleavage stage embryos. It includes the preparation of injection needles and egg collection cages, the process of egg collection, and mechanical removal of the chorion. It goes over how to microinject and image the embryos and how to analyze the bulk flow of LDs using particle image velocimetry (PIV, adapted from6). It provides advice on troubleshooting to ensure embryo survival and create the best system for imaging. Also discussed is how the protocol can be modified to simultaneously image LDs and microtubules or to apply it to the study of other organelles, including lysosomes, mitochondria, yolk vesicles, and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER).

<table border="1" fo:keep-together.within-page="1" fo:keep-with-next.within-page="always">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>AUTODO</td>
			<td>abcepta</td>
			<td>SM1000a</td>
			<td>Stains lipid droplets in violet/blue</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>BODIPY 493/503</td>
			<td>ThermoFisher</td>
			<td>D3922</td>
			<td>Stains lipid droplets in green</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Desiccant Beads &#8211;Desiccant-Anhydrous Indicating Drierite</td>
			<td>W.A. Hammond Drierite Company</td>
			<td>21001</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Dissecting microscope SteREO DiscoveryV20 with transillumination base</td>
			<td>Zeiss</td>
			<td>4350030000000000</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Double sided tape-Permanent Double-Sided Tape</td>
			<td>Scotch (3M)</td>
			<td>-</td>
			<td>Sold by many vendors</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>ER-Tracker Green (BODIPY FL Glibenclamide)</td>
			<td>ThermoFisher</td>
			<td>E34251</td>
			<td>Stains the ER/nuclear envelope</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Femptotip II</td>
			<td>Eppendorf</td>
			<td>H129354N</td>
			<td>Ready to use</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Glass capillaries -Glass Thinw w/fil 1.0mm 4in</td>
			<td>World Precision Instruments</td>
			<td>TW100F-4</td>
			<td>Must be pulled</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Glass coverslip</td>
			<td>-</td>
			<td>-</td>
			<td>Buy the appropriate refractive index for your objective lens</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Glass slides -Double Frosted Microscope Slides precleaned</td>
			<td>FisherBrand</td>
			<td>12-550-343</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Halocarbon oil 27</td>
			<td>Sigma-Aldrich</td>
			<td>H8773-100ML</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Halocarbon oil 700</td>
			<td>Sigma-Aldrich</td>
			<td>H8898-50ML</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Heptane 
			greener alternative 
			anhydrous, 99%</td>
			<td>Sigma-Aldrich</td>
			<td>246654-1L</td>
			<td>Heptane is considered toxic by the USA&#39;s OSHA</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Confocal microscope</td>
			<td>Leica</td>
			<td>Sp5</td>
			<td>Many different types of confocal microscopes will work.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>LipidSpot 610</td>
			<td>Biotium</td>
			<td>#70069</td>
			<td>Stains lipid droplets in far red</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>LysoTracker Red</td>
			<td>ThermoFisher</td>
			<td>L7528</td>
			<td>Stains lysosomes in red</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>MitoView 633</td>
			<td>Biotium</td>
			<td>#70055</td>
			<td>Stains mitochondria</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Needle loading pipette tips - 20uL microloader tips</td>
			<td>Eppendorf</td>
			<td># 5242956.003</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>P-1000, Next Generation Micropipette Puller</td>
			<td>Sutter Instruments</td>
			<td>P-1000</td>
			<td>The settings used are heat-470, pull-70, velocity-60, delay-90, pressure-200, ramp-479 at 1x1. They refer to the intensity and length of the heating, the timing of pulling force and whether the force is applied linearly. Using these conditions, one capillary generates two usable needles with fine openings at the tip.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>SiR-Tubulin</td>
			<td>Cytosketon Inc</td>
			<td>CY-SC014</td>
			<td>Made by Spirochrome; Cytoskeleton Inc. is the North American distributor. Stains microtubules in far red</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>TransferMan</td>
			<td>Eppendorf</td>
			<td>&#160;5178 NK</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>ViaFluor 405</td>
			<td>Biotium</td>
			<td>#70064</td>
			<td>Stains microtubules in violet/blue</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>

visualizing cytoskeleton-dependent trafficking of lipid-containing organelles in drosophila embryos

Early Drosophila embryos are large cells containing a vast array of conventional and embryo-specific organelles. During the first three hours of embryogenesis, these organelles undergo dramatic movements powered by actin-based cytoplasmic streaming and motor-driven trafficking along microtubules. The development of a multitude of small, organelle-specific fluorescent probes (FPs) makes it possible to visualize a wide range of different lipid-containing structures in any genotype, allowing live imaging without requiring a genetically encoded fluorophore. This protocol shows how to inject vital dyes and molecular probes into Drosophila embryos to monitor the trafficking of specific organelles by live imaging. This approach is demonstrated by labeling lipid droplets (LDs) and following their bulk movement by particle image velocimetry (PIV). This protocol provides a strategy amenable to the study of other organelles, including lysosomes, mitochondria, yolk vesicles, and the ER, and for tracking the motion of individual LDs along microtubules. Using commercially available dyes brings the benefits of separation into the violet/blue and far-red regions of the spectrum. By multiplex co-labeling of organelles and/or cytoskeletal elements via microinjection, all the genetic resources in Drosophila are available for trafficking studies without the need to introduce fluorescently tagged proteins. Unlike genetically encoded fluorophores, which have low quantum yields and bleach easily, many of the available dyes allow for rapid and simultaneous capture of several channels with high photon yields.

Following injection, the dye will be localized only at the site where the needle tip was inserted. The dye will then diffuse away from the injection site depending on its diffusive characteristics. Figure 1 shows injection of BODIPY 493/503, soon after injection (panel A) and 24 min later (panel B). After 24 min, the dye has made it to roughly the midpoint of the embryo&#39;s long axis.
Analyzing organelle motility can be achieved through dye injections and time-lapse imaging. In Figure 2, an embryo was co-injected with BODIPY 493/503 (Figure 2A) and LysoTracker Red (Figure 2B) and imaged using laser excitation at 488 and 596 nm, respectively. This embryo was then time-lapse imaged (one frame every 30 s for 30 min, 5 min analyzed). The time series was then run through PIV analysis, the output of which is shown via streamlines in Figure 2A,B. Note that the streamlines do not represent the trajectory of individual particles, but the cytoplasmic flow is inferred from analyzing all the particles in that region of the cytoplasm. Through labeling of two independent cellular structures (LDs and acidic organelles), the PIV analysis finds similar flows, with both labels converging on the central region of the embryo where the cytoplasm is flowing into the embryo&#39;s interior6.
Currently available FPs allow the labeling of many other organelles and cellular structures. Figure 3 shows the labeling of the ER via ER tracker Green. ER tracker provides a nice resolution of the nuclear envelope, allowing visualization of major cell cycle stages. ER tracker Green is imaged using 488 nm excitation.
Labeling of the mitochondria is tricky, as most dyes tested seem to be trapped in the first mitochondrion they enter. On the other hand, no sign of dye toxicity was detected, making it possible to follow labeled mitochondria through cellularization and the ectodermal nuclear cycle 15. Figure 4 shows an ectodermal cell several hours post-injection with Mitoview 633 (excitation wavelength 633 nm).
BODIPY, Lysotracker, and LipidSpot are robust and can be used to acquire ~500+ images at 512 x 512, line average 3, frame rates from 1/s to 0.1/s. ER tracker Green, SiR-tubulin, and the mitochondrial dyes mentioned are less robust and yield ~50-200 images under the same conditions.
Starting at blastoderm stages, LDs move bidirectionally along microtubules, powered by the opposite-polarity motors kinesin-1 and cytoplasmic dynein5. This motion can be visualized by co-labeling LDs and microtubules via injecting both BODIPY 493/503 and SiR-Tubulin (Figure 5). As LDs frequently reverse their direction of movement (as they switch between kinesin-1 and cytoplasmic dynein), higher frame rates during acquisition better capture critical details of LD motility.
Live imaging of autofluorescent yolk vesicles is possible without any form of dye injection (Figure 6). However, the autofluorescence is dim, and the excitation laser is phototoxic. Thus, live imaging of autofluorescent yolk has a poor signal-to-noise ratio relative to dye injection.
<img alt="Figure 1" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/63291/63291fig01.jpg" /> 
Figure 1: Diffusion of BODIPY 493/503 through the embryo. The dye was injected along the lateral edge toward the anterior end (top right) and diffuses from this injection site into the embryo, labeling LDs. (A) The dye has diffused through portions of the embryo adjacent to the injection site. (B) Roughly 24 min/2 nuclear cycles later, the dye has diffused past the midpoint of the embryo. Scale bar: 100 &#181;m. A 1024 x 1024 frame (line average 4) was acquired every 30 s. <a href="https://jove.unicartagenaproxy.elogim.com/files/ftp_upload/63291/63291fig01large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Figure 2" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/63291/63291fig02.jpg" /> 
Figure 2: Particle image velocimetry (PIV) for LDs and acidic organelles. An embryo was injected with both BODIPY 493/503 and LysoTracker Red. (A) BODIPY channel. (B) LysoTracker Red channel. (A&#39;,B&#39;) Streamline diagrams generated by PIV analysis of the two channels generated from 10 sequential frames, including those shown in A and B. A&#39; corresponds to the flow of LDs, and B&#39; corresponds to the flow of acidic organelles. Note that both A&#39; and B&#39; show a left-of-center confluence where embryonic contents are flowing out of the plane of view, into the center of the embryo. Also, note that BODIPY has diffused more than LysoTracker as different dyes have different diffusive properties. Scale bar: 100 &#181;m. A 1024 x 1024 frame (line average 4) was acquired every 30 s. <a href="https://jove.unicartagenaproxy.elogim.com/files/ftp_upload/63291/63291fig02large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Figure 3" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/63291/63291fig03.jpg" /> 
Figure 3: ER tracker labels syncytial nuclear divisions. A syncytial blastoderm embryo was microinjected with ER tracker and a portion of its surface was imaged over time. (A) Spindle assembly during a nuclear division. (B) Abscission of the nuclear envelope during the same division. (C)&#160;Subsequent interphase. (D) The onset of the next division is indicated by centrosome appearance (occurrence of circular ER-free regions, marked by arrowheads). Note the gradual dye bleaching. Excitation wavelength: 488 nm. Scale bar: 5 &#181;m. A: initial frame, B: 3 min elapsed, C: 10 min elapsed, D: 13 min elapsed. A 1024 x 1024 frame (line average 4) was acquired every 30 s. <a href="https://jove.unicartagenaproxy.elogim.com/files/ftp_upload/63291/63291fig03large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Figure 4" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/63291/63291fig04.jpg" /> 
Figure 4: Mitoview 633 labeling of mitochondria. An embryo was injected with Mitoview 633 during the syncytial blastoderm stage and imaged 4 h later, after cellularization. The image shows a neuroectodermal cell of an embryo in germ-band extension. Scale bar: 5 &#181;m. A 1024 x 1024 frame (line average 4) was acquired every 30 s. <a href="https://jove.unicartagenaproxy.elogim.com/files/ftp_upload/63291/63291fig04large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Figure 5" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/63291/63291fig05.jpg" /> 
Figure 5: Co-labeling of LDs and microtubules. A cellularizing embryo was injected with a mixture of BODIPY 493/503 (yellow A,B,C) and SiR Tubulin (magenta A&#39;,B&#39;,C&#39;). A&#39;&#39;, B&#39;&#39;, C&#39;&#39; show the merged channels. Panels A, A&#39;, and A&#39;&#39; show the initial frame, panels B, B&#39; and B&#39;&#39; show the frame after 5 s, and panels C, C&#39; and C&#39;&#39; show the frame after 10 s. Scale bar: 5 &#181;m. A 512 x 512 frame (line average 3) was acquired every 2.5 s. <a href="https://jove.unicartagenaproxy.elogim.com/files/ftp_upload/63291/63291fig05large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Figure 6" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/63291/63291fig06.jpg" /> 
Figure 6: Imaging yolk vesicle autofluorescence during syncytial cleavage stages. (A) At the start of the acquisition. (B) After 8 min. (C) After 16 min. Excitation wavelength: 405 nm. Low excitation intensity was used to keep the embryo alive. Scale bar: 100 &#181;m. A 1024 x 1024 frame (line average 4) was acquired every 30 s. <a href="https://jove.unicartagenaproxy.elogim.com/files/ftp_upload/63291/63291fig06large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
Supplemental data. <a href="https://jove.unicartagenaproxy.elogim.com/files/ftp_upload/63291/PIV_analysis_script_Kilwein_Welte_JoVE_2021.zip" target="_blank">Please click here to download this File.</a>

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Visualizing Cytoskeleton-Dependent Trafficking of Lipid-Containing Organelles in Drosophila Embryos at JoVE.com

Visualizing Cytoskeleton-Dependent Trafficking of Lipid-Containing Organelles in Drosophila Embryos

In the early Drosophila embryo, many organelles are motile. In principle, they can be imaged live via specific fluorescent probes, but the eggshell prevents direct application to the embryo. This protocol describes how to introduce such probes via microinjection, and then analyze bulk organelle motion via particle image velocimetry.

Visualizing Cytoskeleton-Dependent Trafficking of Lipid-Containing Organelles in Drosophila Embryos

Early Drosophila embryos are large cells containing a vast array of conventional and embryo-specific organelles. During the first three hours of ...

visualizing-cytoskeleton-dependent-trafficking-lipid-containing

Research

JoVE Journal

Developmental Biology

2.1K Views.  University of Rochester. In the early Drosophila embryo, many organelles are motile. In principle, they can be imaged live via specific fluorescent probes, but the eggshell prevents direct application to the embryo. This protocol describes how to introduce such probes via microinjection, and then analyze bulk organelle motion via particle image velocimetry.

Video: Visualizing Cytoskeleton-Dependent Trafficking of Lipid-Containing Organelles in Drosophila Embryos

Multi-target Chromogenic Whole-mount In Situ Hybridization for Comparing Gene Expression Domains in Drosophila Embryos

To analyze gene regulatory networks active during embryonic development and organogenesis it is essential to precisely define how the different genes are expressed in spatial relation to each other in situ. Multi-target chromogenic whole-mount in situ hybridization (MC-WISH) greatly facilitates the instant comparison of gene expression patterns, as it allows distinctive visualization of different mRNA species in contrasting colors in the same sample specimen. This provides the possibility to relate gene expression domains topographically to each other with high accuracy and to define unique and overlapping expression sites. In the presented protocol, we describe a MC-WISH procedure for comparing mRNA expression patterns of different genes in Drosophila embryos. Up to three RNA probes, each specific for another gene and labeled by a different hapten, are simultaneously hybridized to the embryo samples and subsequently detected by alkaline phosphatase-based colorimetric immunohistochemistry. The described procedure is detailed here for Drosophila, but works equally well with zebrafish embryos.

Multi-target Chromogenic Whole-mount In Situ Hybridization for Comparing Gene Expression Domains in Drosophila Embryos

We describe a multi-target chromogenic whole-mount in situ hybridization (MC-WISH) procedure in intact Drosophila embryos allowing simultaneous and specific detection of three different mRNA distribution patterns by contrasting color precipitates.

To analyze gene regulatory networks active during embryonic development and organogenesis it is essential to precisely define how the different genes are ...

Biosensing Motor Neuron Membrane Potential in Live Zebrafish Embryos

The protocols described here are designed to allow researchers to study cell communication without altering the integrity of the environment in which the cells are located. Specifically, they have been developed to analyze the electrical activity of excitable cells, such as spinal neurons. In such a scenario, it is crucial to preserve the integrity of the spinal cell, but it is also important to preserve the anatomy and physiological shape of the systems involved. Indeed, the comprehension of the manner in which the nervous system-and other complex systems-works must be based on a systemic approach. For this reason, the live zebrafish embryo was chosen as a model system, and the spinal neuron membrane voltage changes were evaluated without interfering with the physiological conditions of the embryos. 
Here, an approach combining the employment of zebrafish embryos with a FRET-based biosensor is described. Zebrafish embryos are characterized by a very simplified nervous system and are particularly suited for imaging applications thanks to their transparency, allowing for the employment of fluorescence-based voltage indicators at the plasma membrane during zebrafish development. The synergy between these two components makes it possible to analyze the electrical activity of the cells in intact living organisms, without perturbing the physiological state. Finally, this non-invasive approach can co-exist with other analyses (e.g., spontaneous movement recordings, as shown here).

Protocols described here allow for the study of the electrical properties of excitable cells in the most non-invasive physiological conditions by employing zebrafish embryos in an in vivo system together with a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based genetically encoded voltage indicator (GEVI) selectively expressed in the cell type of interest.

The protocols described here are designed to allow researchers to study cell communication without altering the integrity of the environment in which the ...

Protocols for Visualizing Steroidogenic Organs and Their Interactive Organs with Immunostaining in the Fruit Fly Drosophila melanogaster

In multicellular organisms, a small group of cells is endowed with a specialized function in their biogenic activity, inducing a systemic response to&#160;growth and reproduction. In insects, the larval prothoracic gland (PG) and the adult female ovary play essential roles in biosynthesizing the principal steroid hormones called ecdysteroids. These ecdysteroidogenic organs are innervated from the nervous system, through&#160;which the timing of biosynthesis is affected by environmental cues. Here we describe a protocol for visualizing ecdysteroidogenic organs and their interactive organs in larvae and adults of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, which provides a suitable model system for studying steroid hormone biosynthesis and its regulatory mechanism. Skillful dissection allows us to maintain the positions of ecdysteroidogenic organs and their interactive organs including the brain, the ventral nerve cord, and other tissues. Immunostaining with antibodies against ecdysteroidogenic enzymes, along with transgenic fluorescence proteins driven by tissue-specific promoters, are available to label ecdysteroidogenic cells. Moreover, the innervations of the ecdysteroidogenic organs can also be labeled by specific antibodies or a collection of GAL4 drivers in various types of neurons. Therefore, the ecdysteroidogenic organs and their neuronal connections can be&#160;visualized simultaneously&#160;by immunostaining and transgenic techniques. Finally, we describe how to visualize germline stem cells, whose proliferation and maintenance are controlled by ecdysteroids. This method contributes to comprehensive understanding of steroid hormone biosynthesis and its neuronal regulatory mechanism.

Protocols for Visualizing Steroidogenic Organs and Their Interactive Organs with Immunostaining in the Fruit Fly Drosophila melanogaster

We describe a protocol for dissection, fixation, and immunostaining of steroidogenic organs in Drosophila larvae and adult females to study steroid hormone biosynthesis and its regulatory mechanism. In addition to steroidogenic organs, we visualize the innervation of steroidogenic organs as well as steroidogenic target cells such as germline stem cells.

In multicellular organisms, a small group of cells is endowed with a specialized function in their biogenic activity, inducing a systemic response ...

Dissection and Immunofluorescent Staining of Mushroom Body and Photoreceptor Neurons in Adult Drosophila melanogaster Brains

Nervous system development involves a sequential series of events that are coordinated by several signaling pathways and regulatory networks. Many of the proteins involved in these pathways are evolutionarily conserved between mammals and other eukaryotes, such as the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, suggesting that similar organizing principles exist during the development of these organisms. Importantly, Drosophila has been used extensively to identify cellular and molecular mechanisms regulating processes that are required in mammals including neurogenesis, differentiation, axonal guidance, and synaptogenesis. Flies have also been used successfully to model a variety of human neurodevelopmental diseases. Here we describe a protocol for the step-by-step microdissection, fixation, and immunofluorescent localization of proteins within the adult Drosophila brain. This protocol focuses on two example neuronal populations, mushroom body neurons and retinal photoreceptors, and includes optional steps to trace individual mushroom body neurons using Mosaic Analysis with a Repressible Cell Marker (MARCM) technique. Example data from both wild-type and mutant brains are shown along with a brief description of a scoring criteria for axonal guidance defects. While this protocol highlights two well-established antibodies for investigating the morphology of mushroom body and photoreceptor neurons, other Drosophila brain regions and the localization of proteins within other brain regions can also be investigated using this protocol.

Dissection and Immunofluorescent Staining of Mushroom Body and Photoreceptor Neurons in Adult Drosophila melanogaster Brains

This protocol describes the dissection and immunostaining of adult Drosophila melanogaster brain tissues. Specifically, this protocol highlights the use of Drosophila mushroom body and photoreceptor neurons as example neuronal subsets that can be accurately used to uncover general principles underlying many aspects of neuronal development.

Nervous system development involves a sequential series of events that are coordinated by several signaling pathways and regulatory networks. Many of the ...

Visualizing the Node and Notochordal Plate In Gastrulating Mouse Embryos Using Scanning Electron Microscopy and Whole Mount Immunofluorescence

The post-implantation mouse embryo undergoes major shape changes after the initiation of gastrulation and morphogenesis. A hallmark of morphogenesis is the formation of the transient organizers, the node and notochordal plate, from cells that have passed through the primitive streak. The proper formation of these signaling centers is essential for the development of the body plan and techniques to visualize them are of high interest to mouse developmental biologists. The node and notochordal plate lie on the ventral surface of gastrulating mouse embryos around embryonic day (E) 7.5 of development. The node is a cup-shaped structure whose cells possess a single slender cilium each. The proper subcellular localization and rotation of the cilia in the node pit determines left-right asymmetry. The notochordal plate cells also possess single cilia albeit shorter than those of the node cells. The notochordal plate forms the notochord which acts as an important signaling organizer for somitogenesis and neural patterning. Because the cells of the node and notochordal plate are transiently present on the surface and possess cilia, they can be visualized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Among other techniques used to visualize these structures at the cellular level is whole mount immunofluorescence (WMIF) using the antibodies against the proteins that are highly expressed in the node and notochordal plate. In this report, we describe our optimized protocols to perform SEM and WMIF of the node and notochordal plate in developing mouse embryos to help in the assessment of tissue shape and cellular organization in wild-type and gastrulation mutant embryos.

The node and notochordal plate are transient signaling organizers in developing mouse embryos that can be visualized using several techniques. Here, we describe in detail how to perform two of the techniques to study their structure and morphogenesis: 1) scanning electron microscopy (SEM); and 2) whole mount immunofluorescence (WMIF).

The post-implantation mouse embryo undergoes major shape changes after the initiation of gastrulation and morphogenesis. A hallmark of morphogenesis is ...

Thawing, Culturing, and Cryopreserving Drosophila Cell Lines

There are currently over 160 distinct Drosophila cell lines distributed by the Drosophila Genomics Resource Center (DGRC). With genome engineering, the number of novel cell lines is expected to increase. The DGRC aims to familiarize researchers with using Drosophila cell lines as an experimental tool to complement and drive their research agenda. Procedures for working with a variety of Drosophila cell lines with distinct characteristics are provided, including protocols for thawing, culturing, and cryopreserving cell lines. Importantly, this publication demonstrates the best practices required to work with Drosophila cell lines to minimize the risk of contaminations from adventitious microorganisms or from other cell lines. Researchers who become familiar with these procedures will be able to delve into the many applications that use Drosophila cultured cells including biochemistry, cell biology and functional genomics.

Thawing, Culturing, and Cryopreserving Drosophila Cell Lines

Drosophila cell lines are important reagents for both fundamental and biomedical research. This article provides protocols for thawing, subculturing, and the cryopreservation of commonly used Drosophila cell lines to assist researchers in incorporating the use of these reagents in their research.

There are currently over 160 distinct Drosophila cell lines distributed by the Drosophila Genomics Resource Center (DGRC). With genome engineering, the ...

Imaging Intranuclear Actin Rods in Live Heat Stressed Drosophila Embryos

The purpose of this protocol is to visualize intranuclear actin rods that assemble in live Drosophila melanogaster embryos following heat stress. Actin rods are a hallmark of a conserved, inducible Actin Stress Response (ASR) that accompanies human pathologies, including neurodegenerative disease. Previously, we showed that the ASR contributes to morphogenesis failures and reduced viability of developing embryos. This protocol allows the continued study of mechanisms underlying actin rod assembly and the ASR in a model system that is highly amenable to imaging, genetics and biochemistry. Embryos are collected and mounted on a coverslip to prepare them for injection. Rhodamine-conjugated globular actin (G-actinRed) is diluted and loaded into a microneedle. A single injection is made into the center of each embryo. After injection, embryos are incubated at elevated temperature and intranuclear actin rods are then visualized by confocal microscopy. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiments may be performed on the actin rods; and other actin-rich structures in the cytoplasm can also be imaged. We find that G-actinRed polymerizes like endogenous G-actin and does not, on its own, interfere with normal embryo development. One limitation of this protocol is that care must be taken during injection to avoid serious injury to the embryo. However, with practice, injecting G-actinRed into Drosophila embryos is a fast and reliable way to visualize actin rods and can easily be used with flies of any genotype or with the introduction of other cellular stresses, including hypoxia and oxidative stress.

Imaging Intranuclear Actin Rods in Live Heat Stressed Drosophila Embryos

The goal of this protocol is to inject Rhodamine-conjugated globular actin into Drosophila embryos and image intranuclear actin rod assembly following heat stress.

The purpose of this protocol is to visualize intranuclear actin rods that assemble in live Drosophila melanogaster embryos following heat stress. Actin ...

Visualizing the Effects of Oxidative Damage on Drosophila Egg Chambers using Live Imaging

Live imaging of Drosophila melanogaster ovaries has been instrumental in understanding a variety of basic cellular processes during development, including ribonucleoprotein particle movement, mRNA localization, organelle movement, and cytoskeletal dynamics. There are several methods for live imaging that have been developed. Due to the fact that each method involves dissecting individual ovarioles placed in media or halocarbon oil, cellular damage due to hypoxia and/or physical manipulation will inevitably occur over time. One downstream effect of hypoxia is to increase oxidative damage in the cells. The purpose of this protocol is to use live imaging to visualize the effects of oxidative damage on the localization and dynamics of subcellular structures in Drosophila ovaries after induction of controlled cellular damage. Here, we use hydrogen peroxide to induce cellular oxidative damage and give examples of the effects of such damage on two subcellular structures, mitochondria and Clu bliss particles. However, this method is applicable to any subcellular structure. The limitations are that hydrogen peroxide can only be added to aqueous media and would not work for imaging that uses halocarbon oil. The advantages are that hydrogen peroxide is readily available and inexpensive, acts quickly, its concentrations can be modulated, and oxidative damage is a good approximation of damage caused by hypoxia as well as general tissue damage due to manipulation.

The objective of this protocol is to use live imaging to visualize the effects of oxidative damage on the localization and dynamics of subcellular structures in Drosophila ovaries.

Live imaging of Drosophila melanogaster ovaries has been instrumental in understanding a variety of basic cellular processes during development, including ...

In Ovo Intravascular Injection in Chicken Embryos

As a classical model system of embryo biology, the chicken embryo has been used to investigate embryonic development and differentiation. Delivering exogenous materials into chicken embryos has a great advantage for studying gene function, transgenic breeding, and chimera preparation during embryonic development. Here we show the method of in ovo intravascular injection whereby exogenous materials such as plasmid vectors or modified primordial germ cells (PGCs) can be transferred into donor chicken embryos at early developmental stages. The results show that the intravascular injection through the dorsal aorta and head allows injected materials to diffuse into the whole embryo through the blood circulatory system. In the presented protocol, the efficacy of exogenous plasmid and lentiviral vector introduction, and the colonization of injected exogenous PGCs in the recipient gonad, were determined by observing fluorescence in the embryos. This article describes detailed procedures of this method, thereby providing an excellent approach to studying gene function, embryo and developmental biology, and gonad-chimeric chicken production. In conclusion, this article will allow researchers to perform in ovo intravascular injection of exogenous materials into chicken embryos with great success and reproducibility.

In Ovo Intravascular Injection in Chicken Embryos

The overall goal of this paper is to describe how to perform in ovo intracellular injection of exogenous materials into chicken embryos. This approach is very useful to study the developmental biology of chicken embryos.

As a classical model system of embryo biology, the chicken embryo has been used to investigate embryonic development and differentiation. Delivering ...

Confocal and Super-Resolution Imaging of Polarized Intracellular Trafficking and Secretion of Basement Membrane Proteins During Drosophila Oogenesis

The basement membrane (BM) - a specialized sheet of extracellular matrix present at the basal side of epithelial cells - is critical for the establishment and maintenance of epithelial tissue morphology and organ morphogenesis. Moreover, the BM is essential for tissue modeling, serving as a signaling platform, and providing external forces to shape tissues and organs. Despite the many important roles that the BM plays during normal development and pathological conditions, the biological pathways controlling the intracellular trafficking of BM-containing vesicles and how basal secretion leads to the polarized deposition of BM proteins are poorly understood. The follicular epithelium of the Drosophila ovary is an excellent model system to study the basal deposition of BM membrane proteins, as it produces and secretes all major components of the BM. Confocal and super-resolution imaging combined with image processing in fixed tissues allows for the identification and characterization of cellular factors specifically involved in the intracellular trafficking and deposition of BM proteins. This article presents a detailed protocol for staining and imaging BM-containing vesicles and deposited BM using endogenously tagged proteins in the follicular epithelium of the Drosophila ovary. This protocol can be applied to address both qualitative and quantitative questions and it was developed to accommodate high-throughput screening, allowing for the rapid and efficient identification of factors involved in the polarized intracellular trafficking and secretion of vesicles during epithelial tissue development.

Confocal and Super-Resolution Imaging of Polarized Intracellular Trafficking and Secretion of Basement Membrane Proteins During Drosophila Oogenesis

The basement membrane is essential for tissue and organ morphogenesis during development. To better understand the mechanisms leading to proper placement of this structure, the protocol presented describes methods to visualize and characterize the intracellular trafficking and secretion of basement membrane proteins in epithelial cells using confocal and super-resolution microscopy.

The basement membrane (BM) - a specialized sheet of extracellular matrix present at the basal side of epithelial cells - is critical for the establishment ...

Visualizing Cytoskeleton-Dependent Trafficking of Lipid-Containing Organelles in Drosophila Embryos

Summary

Explore More Videos

Chapters in this video

Multi-target Chromogenic Whole-mount In Situ Hybridization for Comparing Gene Expression Domains in Drosophila Embryos

Biosensing Motor Neuron Membrane Potential in Live Zebrafish Embryos

Protocols for Visualizing Steroidogenic Organs and Their Interactive Organs with Immunostaining in the Fruit Fly Drosophila melanogaster

Dissection and Immunofluorescent Staining of Mushroom Body and Photoreceptor Neurons in Adult Drosophila melanogaster Brains

Visualizing the Node and Notochordal Plate In Gastrulating Mouse Embryos Using Scanning Electron Microscopy and Whole Mount Immunofluorescence

Thawing, Culturing, and Cryopreserving Drosophila Cell Lines

Imaging Intranuclear Actin Rods in Live Heat Stressed Drosophila Embryos

Visualizing the Effects of Oxidative Damage on Drosophila Egg Chambers using Live Imaging

In Ovo Intravascular Injection in Chicken Embryos

Confocal and Super-Resolution Imaging of Polarized Intracellular Trafficking and Secretion of Basement Membrane Proteins During Drosophila Oogenesis