This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG RE 2740/3-1). We thank Frank Huethe and Thomas G&#252;nther for the in-house production of the custom-made tES set-up and DC-stimulator.

For research involving animals, the relevant (country-specific) approvals must be obtained before starting experiments. All animal experiments reported here are performed according to the EU directive 2010/63/EU, the updated German animal protection law (&#34;Tierschutzgesetz&#34;) of July 2013, and the updated German animal research regulations of August 2013. Animal protocols have been approved by the local authorities &#34;Commission for Animal Experimentation of the Regional Council of Freiburg&#34; and &#34;Commission for Animal Experimentation of the University Medical Center Freiburg&#34;.
1. Preparation of Instrumentation and Material for Surgery
<ol>
	<li>Make sure that the items listed in Figure 1 are available and already placed for surgery.</li>
	<li>Prepare a thin rectangular platinum plate (e.g., 10 mm x 6 mm x 0.15 mm), which will serve as the counter electrode placed subcutaneously on the chest, and punch two small holes in two opposite corners of the plate.</li>
	<li>Solder an insulated cable with a length of ~10 cm using a lead-free tin-solder to one of the corners (without a hole) of the platinum plate.</li>
	<li>Apply a small drop of histo-acrylic glue on the soldering joint for isolation.</li>
</ol>
2. Preparation of the Rodent for Surgery
<ol>
	<li>Assign a study number to the rodent and note this on the prepared surgery card.</li>
	<li>Weigh the rodent and note the weight on the surgery card. Calculate the dose of injection anesthetics (e.g., ketamine 80 mg/kg bodyweight plus xylazine 12 mg/kg bodyweight for rats).</li>
	<li>Induce anesthesia by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of the calculated amount of anesthetics. 
	NOTE: When using inhalation anesthesia instead (e.g., isoflurane), place the rodent in an induction chamber with continuous flow of ~4% in 1-2 L/min oxygen.</li>
	<li>Check depth of anesthesia by the toe pinch reflex starting 5 min post injection. If the toe pinch reflex is still present, reach prolongation and deepening of anesthesia by injection of 30% of the initial dose.
	<ol>
		<li>If at any time point in the experiment the toe pinch reflex returns, 30% of the initial dose of anesthesia should be injected.</li>
		<li>When using inhalation anesthesia, look for loss of the postural reflex of the rodent in the induction chamber and check the depth of anesthesia by the lack of a toe pinch reflex. If reflexes are still present, extend the duration in the anesthesia chamber. Throughout the whole experiment, adapt the percentage of isoflurane to the depth of anesthesia until reaching a maintenance concentration of ~1-1.5% isoflurane.</li>
		<li>When the frequency of breathing decreases and gasping occurs, lower the percentage; when the rodent regains the toe pinch reflex or shows spontaneous movement, increase the percentage of inhalation anesthetic.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>As soon as reflexes are absent, place the rodent on the lab bench or hold it in hand. 
	NOTE: When using inhalation anesthesia, provide continued reduced isoflurane flow (now between 2-3%) by using a nozzle connected to the nebulizer.</li>
	<li>Remove the hair on the rat&#39;s head by shaving the area from ear to ear and from between the rostral eye level to just behind the ears with a clipper. Then remove the hair on the chest by shaving the area between the forelimbs from the xiphoid up to the clavicles. 
	NOTE: Keeping the skin under tension eases the shaving.</li>
	<li>Cover the eyes of the rat with a drop of eye ointment to protect the cornea.</li>
	<li>Mark the rat&#39;s ear according to the assigned study number. 
	NOTE: Depending on the length of the study, a tail mark might be sufficient, otherwise standardized earmarking is preferable.</li>
</ol>
3. Surgical Procedure: Chest Electrode Implantation
NOTE: This step can be skipped when the counter electrode is placed externally on the shaved chest with a vest.
<ol>
	<li>Place the rodent prone (on the chest) on the operation table. 
	NOTE: In case of inhalation anesthesia, keep the rat&#39;s snout placed in the anesthesia nozzle, further reducing the isoflurane concentration to 1.5-2%.</li>
	<li>Disinfect the shaved scalp with a disinfectant spray or with a swab soaked in antiseptic agent (e.g., ethanol 70%) and let air-dry. Repeat two times.</li>
	<li>Cut the skin with a scalpel in one line from the rostral eye level to the mid ear level. 
	NOTE: This allows for tunneling of the connecting cable from the implanted chest electrode toward the top of the head and is also the desired cut for the DCS electrode socket placement.</li>
	<li>Turn the rat to supine position, so that the chest is exposed.</li>
	<li>Disinfect the skin of the chest as described in step 3.2.</li>
	<li>Elevate the lateral skin of the right chest with a tissue forceps and cut a buttonhole with small scissors of about 0.5 cm medial from the right axilla. Then make a straight sagittal cut in cranial orientation with the scissors.</li>
	<li>Form a subcutaneous pouch by atraumatically disconnecting the skin from the left major pectoral muscle. Do so by repeatedly opening the small scissors (or by a saline soaked cotton swab).</li>
	<li>Turn the animal on its right side to tunnel the cable path from the left occipital corner of the opened head skin along the neck to exit into the pectoral pouch by penetrating the superficial fascia using homeostatic forceps.</li>
	<li>Carefully open the homeostatic forceps to grab the end of the electrode cable attached to the platinum electrode without allowing sharp wires to stray. Pull the cable through the tunnel until the electrode enters the pouch, oriented with the soldering point towards the rodents left hindlimb. Turn the rodent back to the prone position.</li>
	<li>Fix the platinum plate with a sterile synthetic braided non-absorbable suture to the pectoral fascia at the two opposing corner holes (4-5 knots are recommended for stability).</li>
	<li>Similarly attach the cable to the fascia by a loose knot, forming a slight loop before the entrance of the tissue tunnel.</li>
	<li>Close the skin with 3-4 cutaneous sutures depending on the size of the cut (the same suture material can be used as for the electrode and cable).</li>
</ol>
4. Surgical Procedure: Placement of the Epicranial tES Socket
<ol>
	<li>Place the animal in a stereotactic frame. 
	NOTE: If using inhalation anesthesia, lower the concentration of the anesthetic to a maintenance isoflurane flow of ~1.5-1%, adjusted to the toe pinch reflex and breathing pattern.</li>
	<li>Disinfect the shaved scalp as described in step 3.2.</li>
	<li>Cut the skin with a scalpel in one line from the rostral eye level to the mid ear level. 
	NOTE: If the chest electrode placement was performed, steps 4.2 and 4.3 have already been performed.</li>
	<li>Scrape off the periosteum (connective tissue on the skull) to the sides with the scalpel and thoroughly wipe off with cotton swaps. Fixate the connective tissue at the 4 corners of the cut with bulldog clamps and let them hang laterally to keep the surgery field open.</li>
	<li>Apply 0.9% saline to clean the bone surface and tissue with cotton swabs. Then clean the bone surface with 3% H2O2. Avoid contact with the tissue. Hereby the bone is cleaned more thoroughly and minor bleeding from the bone will be stopped. Also, residuals of the periosteum become visible. Remove these residuals with a cotton swab applying moderate pressure. 
	NOTE: Removal of the periosteum residuals will increase adhesion and durability of the tES socket glued onto the bone.
	<ol>
		<li>In case of unstoppable bleeding, use a bone drill and touch it for 1-3 s with slight pressure on the bone. This mechanical procedure will in most cases stop the bleeding without significant heating. Never use electrocautery on the bone; even brief application will result in brain tissue damage (electrocautery should solely be used for wound tissue bleeding).</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>As fixation screws will improve set-up adherence, choose a drill bit fitting the screw size. Place two burr holes on two different bone plates by pre-drilling with a hand drill and then by slight vertical pressure application with the bone drill. Avoid close proximity to the desired position of the tES socket, as it might hinder screwing in the electrode (e.g., for left primary motor cortical tES, choose right frontal and posterior parietal screw position).</li>
	<li>In case of an implanted counter electrode, burr a third hole located in the right posterior parietal bone for future fixation of the tunneled cable.</li>
	<li>Place the plastic screws in the burr holes and screw until the first friction is felt. Then perform three additional 180 &#176; screw turns. Check with forceps for stability of the screw and add one more turn if not tight enough. 
	NOTE: For adult rats this will ensure epidural placement of the screws without damaging the dura or brain (depending on the screw thread design, the turn number might vary) . The use of stainless steel screws should also be feasible, since even at DCS current densities above the neurodegeneration threshold, screw placement did not perturb lesion location or extent below the screws.</li>
	<li>Turn on the soldering iron and pre-heat for approximately 5 min. Wind the cable exiting the tissue tunnel occipitally around the right parietal screw and then cut it, leaving approximately 1 cm cable behind the winding. Carefully strip the insulation at the end of the cable with a scalpel.</li>
	<li>Fix the winded cable to the screw and bone with cyanoacrylic glue.</li>
	<li>Apply a small amount of the lead-free tin-solder to the connector and to the bare wires of the counter electrode cable and connect both by briefly pressing both pre-soldered parts together while touching the soldering tip until the tin-solder melts (about 2-3 s). Remove the soldering tip immediately to avoid excessive metal heating of the cable with subsequent tissue damage.</li>
	<li>Pick up the custom made tES electrode socket (Figure 1B, in red) with bent, serrated tip forceps and apply a thin layer of cyanoacrylic glue to the bottom rim of the socket. For placement above the motor cortex and using a 4 mm diameter socket, place the mid socket point at 2 mm anterior and 2 mm lateral from the bregma. For this position, the inner medial border of the socket should end directly at the sagittal suture and the caudal border should end at the height of bregma. Press the socket briefly onto the bone (most cyanoacrylic glues harden by pressure). 
	NOTE: Placing a light source directly above the socket can ease placing the socket.</li>
	<li>Ensure that the bone within the area of the socket is free of glue (by checking with light because the glue is reflective). In the case of glue spill, remove the socket, scrape the glue with the scalpel, and repeat step 4.12.</li>
	<li>After the socket is in place and the future stimulation area is free of glue, first seal the lateral border of the socket to the neighboring tissue with a small drop of cyanoacrylic glue to avoid a fluid bridge that could lead to shunting of current at this location. Do not apply too much glue as it may flow into the stimulation area (if this occurs, return to step 4.12). 
	NOTE: Keeping the stimulation area free of glue is crucial as a reduction of the stimulation area might dramatically increase current density (A/m&#178;).</li>
	<li>Cover all screws with cyanoacrylic glue.</li>
	<li>Mix the two-component dental acrylic cement in a small silicon tube or glass. As soon as it becomes viscous, apply it with a dental spatula to seal the remaining borders of the socket to the bone. Avoid any flow of dental acrylic cement into the stimulation area.</li>
	<li>Finally cover the whole skull, screws, counter electrode cable and the socket up to &#8531; of the socket with dental acrylic cement. Ensure that the cement has the correct viscosity: if too fluid, it will flow into the surrounding tissue; if too hard it is difficult to distribute it evenly.</li>
	<li>When all the bone is covered and the cement is hardened, remove the bulldog clamps; the skin should just touch the built-up cement so that suturing is not needed. (If the initial cut was chosen too long and the connective tissue or muscle is visible, apply a suture as described in step 3.12).</li>
	<li>Apply one layer of iodine with a cotton swab around the border of the cut skin and subcutaneously inject carprofen (5 mg/kg body weight dissolved in 5-7.5 mL of 0.9% saline for pain treatment and fluid replacement). 
	NOTE: If using inhalation anesthesia, turn it off now.</li>
	<li>Place the rodent in a warming box for recovery from anesthesia until the rodent is awake and postural stability is restored. 
	NOTE: Check the animal&#39;s weight development, wound state, and general well-being criteria daily according to the institution&#39;s recommendation.</li>
</ol>
5. Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Procedure
NOTE: As anesthesia affects tES effects, performing the stimulation in alert rodents whenever possible is recommended. Allow the rodent to recover for at least 5 days (healing of the head and chest wound) before starting experiments. Experiments can be performed at earlier time points after surgery when using an external counter electrode fixed with a vest, as the chest wound is most irritable; but animals need to be habituated to the electrode vest for several days and interference with behavioral tasks might occur.
<ol>
	<li>Fill the tES electrode socket half with 0.9% saline and remove air bubbles.</li>
	<li>Before cathodal tDCS sessions, always check chlorination, and if needed (such as a shiny silver surface), re-chlorinate the Ag/AgCl electrode. Before anodal tDCS sessions, remove possible excess AgCl deposits from previous stimulations with sandpaper to allow for good conductivity during stimulation. Screw in the tES electrode screw cap (Figure 1B, grey piece). 
	CAUTION: Failure to re-chlorinate the electrode between cathodal tDCS sessions will lead to exhaustion of chlorination during stimulation and to toxic build-up by electrochemical reaction. This will induce tissue damage. Re-chlorination is not needed within a single session if stimulation duration is shorter than 20 min.</li>
	<li>Connect the cables to the two connectors on the head (for anodal stimulation, the anodal cable is connected to the connector on the screw cap, for cathodal stimulation, it is opposite). 
	NOTE: When using an externally placed counter electrode, cover the counter electrode with conductive gel and place on the rodent&#39;s chest. This is easiest if the electrode is pre-fixed in a small rodent vest, which the rodent can wear during stimulation.</li>
	<li>Place the rodent into the experimental cage, with the cables connected to a swivel above the cage that allows for free movement.</li>
	<li>Turn on the stimulator and adjust the stimulation parameters (stimulation intensity, duration, ramp up and down time).</li>
	<li>When not using a commercially available stimulation device with a safety shut down and disconnection alarm, include a meter in the circuit to check the constant current flow. 
	NOTE: With this set-up, stimulation can be applied during performance or training of behavioral tasks.</li>
	<li>Check for signs of stress or discomfort of the rodent during stimulation.</li>
	<li>After the end of the stimulation, disconnect the cables, unscrew the electrode cap on the head, and clean and dry the socket with a cotton swab. Return the rodent to the home environment or proceed with a behavioral procedure if desired.</li>
</ol>

<ol>
	<li>Bikson, M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Safety+of+Transcranial+Direct+Current+Stimulation:+Evidence+Based+Update+2016.">Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016.</a> Brain Stimul. 9 (5), 641-661 (2016).</li><li>Bindman, L. J., Lippold, O. C., Redfearn, J. W. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=The+action+of+brief+polarizing+currents+on+the+cerebral+cortex+of+the+rat+(1)+during+current+flow+and+(2)+in+the+production+of+long-lasting+after-effects.">The action of brief polarizing currents on the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) during current flow and (2) in the production of long-lasting after-effects.</a> J Physiol. 172, 369-382 (1964).</li><li>Gartside, I. B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Mechanisms+of+sustained+increases+of+firing+rate+of+neurones+in+the+rat+cerebral+cortex+after+polarization:+role+of+protein+synthesis.">Mechanisms of sustained increases of firing rate of neurones in the rat cerebral cortex after polarization: role of protein synthesis.</a> Nature. 220 (5165), 382-383 (1968).</li><li>Purpura, D. P., McMurtry, J. G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Intracellular+activities+and+potential+changes+during+polarization+of+motor+cortex.">Intracellular activities and potential changes during polarization of motor cortex.</a> Neurophysiol. 28 (1), 166-185 (1965).</li><li>Nitsche, M., Paulus, W. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Excitability+changes+induced+in+the+human+motor+cortex+by+weak+transcranial+direct+current+stimulation.">Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation.</a> J Physiol. 527 (Pt 3), 633-639 (2000).</li><li>Nitsche, M. A., Paulus, W. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Sustained+excitability+elevations+induced+by+transcranial+DC+motor+cortex+stimulation+in+humans.">Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans.</a> Neurology. 57 (10), 1899-1901 (2001).</li><li>Cambiaghi, M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Brain+transcranial+direct+current+stimulation+modulates+motor+excitability+in+mice.">Brain transcranial direct current stimulation modulates motor excitability in mice.</a> Eur J Neuro. 31 (4), 704-709 (2010).</li><li>Fritsch, B., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Direct+current+stimulation+promotes+BDNF-dependent+synaptic+plasticity:+potential+implications+for+motor+learning.">Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning.</a> Neuron. 66 (2), 198-204 (2010).</li><li>Ranieri, F., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Modulation+of+LTP+at+rat+hippocampal+CA3-CA1+synapses+by+direct+current+stimulation.">Modulation of LTP at rat hippocampal CA3-CA1 synapses by direct current stimulation.</a> J Neurophysiol. 107 (7), 1868-1880 (2012).</li><li>Kronberg, G., Bridi, M., Abel, T., Bikson, M., Parra, L. C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Direct+Current+Stimulation+Modulates+LTP+and+LTD:+Activity+Dependence+and+Dendritic+Effects.">Direct Current Stimulation Modulates LTP and LTD: Activity Dependence and Dendritic Effects.</a> Brain Stimul. 10 (November), 51-58 (2016).</li><li>Sun, Y., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Direct+current+stimulation+induces+mGluR5-dependent+neocortical+plasticity.">Direct current stimulation induces mGluR5-dependent neocortical plasticity.</a> Ann Neurol. 80 (2), 233-246 (2016).</li><li>Podda, M. V., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Anodal+transcranial+direct+current+stimulation+boosts+synaptic+plasticity+and+memory+in+mice+via+epigenetic+regulation+of+Bdnf+expression.">Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation boosts synaptic plasticity and memory in mice via epigenetic regulation of Bdnf expression.</a> Sci Rep. 6, 22180 (2016).</li><li>Reis, J., Fritsch, B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Modulation+of+motor+performance+and+motor+learning+by+transcranial+direct+current+stimulation.">Modulation of motor performance and motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation.</a> Curr opin Neurology. 24 (6), 590-596 (2011).</li><li>Buch, E. R., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Effects+of+tDCS+on+motor+learning+and+memory+formation+a+consensus+and+critical+position+paper.">Effects of tDCS on motor learning and memory formation a consensus and critical position paper.</a> Clin Neurophysiol. 128 (4), 589-603 (2017).</li><li>Reis, J., Fischer, J. T., Prichard, G., Weiller, C., Cohen, L. G., Fritsch, B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Time-+but+not+sleep-dependent+consolidation+of+tDCS-enhanced+visuomotor+skills.">Time- but not sleep-dependent consolidation of tDCS-enhanced visuomotor skills.</a> Cerebral cortex. 25 (1), 109-117 (2015).</li><li>Monai, H., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Calcium+imaging+reveals+glial+involvement+in+transcranial+direct+current+stimulation-induced+plasticity+in+mouse+brain.">Calcium imaging reveals glial involvement in transcranial direct current stimulation-induced plasticity in mouse brain.</a> Nature Comm. 7, 11100 (2016).</li><li>Gellner, A. -. K., Reis, J., Fritsch, B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Glia:+A+Neglected+Player+in+Non-invasive+Direct+Current+Brain+Stimulation.">Glia: A Neglected Player in Non-invasive Direct Current Brain Stimulation.</a> Front Cell Neurosci. 10, 188 (2016).</li><li>Takano, Y., Yokawa, T., Masuda, A., Niimi, J., Tanaka, S., Hironaka, N. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+rat+model+for+measuring+the+effectiveness+of+transcranial+direct+current+stimulation+using+fMRI.">A rat model for measuring the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation using fMRI.</a> Neurosci Lett. 491 (1), 40-43 (2011).</li><li>Islam, N., Moriwaki, A., Hattori, Y., Hori, Y. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Anodal+polarization+induces+protein+kinase+C+gamma+(PKC+gamma)-like+immunoreactivity+in+the+rat+cerebral+cortex.">Anodal polarization induces protein kinase C gamma (PKC gamma)-like immunoreactivity in the rat cerebral cortex.</a> Neurosci Res. 21, 169-172 (1994).</li><li>Islam, N., Aftabuddin, M., Moriwaki, A., Hattori, Y., Hori, Y. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Increase+in+the+calcium+level+following+anodal+polarization+in+the+rat+brain.">Increase in the calcium level following anodal polarization in the rat brain.</a> Brain Res. 684 (2), 206-208 (1995).</li><li>Rohan, J. G., Carhuatanta, K. A., McInturf, S. M., Miklasevich, M. K., Jankord, R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Modulating+Hippocampal+Plasticity+with+In+Vivo+Brain+Stimulation.">Modulating Hippocampal Plasticity with In Vivo Brain Stimulation.</a> J Neurosci. 35 (37), 12824-12832 (2015).</li><li>Wachter, D., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Transcranial+direct+current+stimulation+induces+polarity-specific+changes+of+cortical+blood+perfusion+in+the+rat.">Transcranial direct current stimulation induces polarity-specific changes of cortical blood perfusion in the rat.</a> Exp Neurol. 227 (2), 322-327 (2011).</li><li>Koo, H., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=After-effects+of+anodal+transcranial+direct+current+stimulation+on+the+excitability+of+the+motor+cortex+in+rats.">After-effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on the excitability of the motor cortex in rats.</a> Rest Neurol Neurosci. 34 (5), 859-868 (2016).</li><li>Liebetanz, D., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=After-effects+of+transcranial+direct+current+stimulation+(tDCS)+on+cortical+spreading+depression.">After-effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cortical spreading depression.</a> Neurosci Lett. 398 (1-2), 85-90 (2006).</li><li>Fregni, F., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Effects+of+transcranial+direct+current+stimulation+coupled+with+repetitive+electrical+stimulation+on+cortical+spreading+depression.">Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation coupled with repetitive electrical stimulation on cortical spreading depression.</a> Exp Neurol. 204 (1), 462-466 (2007).</li><li>Cambiaghi, M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Flash+visual+evoked+potentials+in+mice+can+be+modulated+by+transcranial+direct+current+stimulation.">Flash visual evoked potentials in mice can be modulated by transcranial direct current stimulation.</a> Neurosci. 185, 161-165 (2011).</li><li>Dockery, C. A., Liebetanz, D., Birbaumer, N., Malinowska, M., Wesierska, M. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Cumulative+benefits+of+frontal+transcranial+direct+current+stimulation+on+visuospatial+working+memory+training+and+skill+learning+in+rats.">Cumulative benefits of frontal transcranial direct current stimulation on visuospatial working memory training and skill learning in rats.</a> Neurobiol Learn Mem. 96 (3), 452-460 (2011).</li><li>Faraji, J., Gomez-Palacio-Schjetnan, A., Luczak, A., Metz, G. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Beyond+the+silence:+Bilateral+somatosensory+stimulation+enhances+skilled+movement+quality+and+neural+density+in+intact+behaving+rats.">Beyond the silence: Bilateral somatosensory stimulation enhances skilled movement quality and neural density in intact behaving rats.</a> Behav Brain Res. 253, 78-89 (2013).</li><li>Pikhovych, A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Transcranial+Direct+Current+Stimulation+Modulates+Neurogenesis+and+Microglia+Activation+in+the+Mouse+Brain.">Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Neurogenesis and Microglia Activation in the Mouse Brain.</a> Stem Cells In. , 1-10 (2016).</li><li>Rueger, M. A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Multi-session+transcranial+direct+current+stimulation+(tDCS)+elicits+inflammatory+and+regenerative+processes+in+the+rat+brain.">Multi-session transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) elicits inflammatory and regenerative processes in the rat brain.</a> PloS one. 7 (8), e43776 (2012).</li><li>Liebetanz, D., Koch, R., Mayenfels, S., K&#246;nig, F., Paulus, W., Nitsche, M. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Safety+limits+of+cathodal+transcranial+direct+current+stimulation+in+rats.">Safety limits of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in rats.</a> Clinical Neurophysiol. 120 (6), 1161-1167 (2009).</li><li>Yoon, K. J., Oh, B. -. M., Kim, D. -. Y. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Functional+improvement+and+neuroplastic+effects+of+anodal+transcranial+direct+current+stimulation+(tDCS)+delivered+1+day+vs.+1+week+after+cerebral+ischemia+in+rats.">Functional improvement and neuroplastic effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) delivered 1 day vs. 1 week after cerebral ischemia in rats.</a> Brain Res. 1452, 61-72 (2012).</li><li>Spezia Adachi, L. N., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Exogenously+induced+brain+activation+regulates+neuronal+activity+by+top-down+modulation:+conceptualized+model+for+electrical+brain+stimulation.">Exogenously induced brain activation regulates neuronal activity by top-down modulation: conceptualized model for electrical brain stimulation.</a> Exp Brain Res. 233 (5), 1377-1389 (2015).</li><li>Jackson, M. P., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Safety+parameter+considerations+of+anodal+transcranial+Direct+Current+Stimulation+in+rats.">Safety parameter considerations of anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in rats.</a> Brain, behavior, and immunity. , (2017).</li><li>Ordek, G., Groth, J. D., Sahin, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Differential+effects+of+ketamine/xylazine+anesthesia+on+the+cerebral+and+cerebellar+cortical+activities+in+the+rat.">Differential effects of ketamine/xylazine anesthesia on the cerebral and cerebellar cortical activities in the rat.</a> J Neurophysiol. 109 (5), 1435-1443 (2013).</li><li>Sykes, M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Differences+in+Motor+Evoked+Potentials+Induced+in+Rats+by+Transcranial+Magnetic+Stimulation+under+Two+Separate+Anesthetics:+Implications+for+Plasticity+Studies.">Differences in Motor Evoked Potentials Induced in Rats by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation under Two Separate Anesthetics: Implications for Plasticity Studies.</a> Front Neural Circ. 10, 80 (2016).</li><li>Zhang, D. X., Levy, W. B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Ketamine+blocks+the+induction+of+LTP+at+the+lateral+entorhinal+cortex-dentate+gyrus+synapses.">Ketamine blocks the induction of LTP at the lateral entorhinal cortex-dentate gyrus synapses.</a> Brain Res. 593 (1), 124-127 (1992).</li></ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

This protocol describes typical materials and procedural steps for surgical realization of a permanent tES set-up, as well as for subsequent stimulation in alert rodents. During preparation of a rodent tES experiment, several methodological aspects (safety and tolerability of tES, outcome parameter) as well as conceptual aspects (comparability with human condition, anticipated effects of stimulation on a particular brain region) need to be taken into account. From a methodological point of view, the surgical set-up of th...

The transcranial administration of electrical currents to the brain (tES) has been used for decades to study brain function and to modify behavior. More recently, applying direct currents, or less frequently alternating currents (tACS and tRNS), noninvasively through the intact skull by use of two or more electrodes (anode(s) and cathode(s)) has gained scientific and clinical interest. In particular, tDCS has been used in more than 33,200 sessions in healthy subjects and patients with neuropsychiatric diseases and has emerged as a safe and easy, cost-effective bedside application, with possible therapeutic potential as well as long-lasting behavioral effects1. This clearly yielded the increased need and scientific interest in mechanistic studies, including safety aspects. This article focuses on the most commonly used form of stimulation, tDCS.
Across species, tDCS modulates cortical excitability and synaptic plasticity. Excitability changes have been reported as polarity-dependent alteration of spontaneous neuronal firing rate in rats and cats2,3,4, or as changes in motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes in humans and mice (both increased after anodal and decreased after cathodal tDCS: human5,6; mouse7). Anodal DCS increased synaptic efficacy of motor cortical or hippocampal synapses in vitro for several hours after stimulation or long term potentiation (LTP), when co-applied with a specific weak synaptic input or when given before a plasticity inducing stimulation8,9,10,11,12. In accordance, the benefits of stimulation on motor or cognitive training success are often revealed only if tDCS is co-applied with training8,13,14,15. While these previous findings are mainly attributed to functions of neurons, it should be noted that non-neuronal cells (glia) may also contribute to functional effects of tDCS. For instance, astrocytic intracellular calcium levels increased during anodal tDCS in alert mice16. Similarly, anodal tDCS at current densities below the threshold for neurodegeneration induced a dose dependent activation of microglia17. However, the modulation of neuron-glia interaction by tDCS needs further specific investigation.
Taken together, animal research clearly advanced our understanding of the modulatory effect of tDCS on excitability and plasticity. However, there is an &#34;inverse translational gap&#34; observable in the exponential increase in publications of human tDCS studies in contrast to the slow and minor increase in investigations of the underlying mechanisms of tES in in vitro and in vivo animal models. Additionally, rodent tES models are performed with high variability across research laboratories (ranging from transdermal to epicranial stimulation), and reported stimulation procedures are often not fully transparent hindering the comparability and replicability of basic research data as well as interpretation of results.
Here, we describe in detail the surgical implementation of a transcranial brain stimulation set-up targeting the primary motor cortex, which allows translation to the human tDCS condition while minimizing variability, and allows repeated stimulation without hindering behavior. A step-by-step protocol for subsequent tES in alert rats is provided. Methodological and conceptual aspects of safe application of tES in alert rodents are discussed.

<table>
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>Softasept N</td>
			<td>B. Braun Melsungen AG, 
			Melsungen, Deutschland</td>
			<td>3887138</td>
			<td>antiseptic agent</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Ethanol 70 %</td>
			<td>Carl Roth GmbH &#38; Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Deutschland</td>
			<td>T913.1</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>arched tip forceps</td>
			<td>FST Fine science tools, Heidelberg, Deutschland</td>
			<td>11071-10</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Iris Forceps, 10cm, Straight, Serrated</td>
			<td>World Precision Instruments, Inc, Sarasota, FL, USA, Inc, Sarasota, FL, USA</td>
			<td>15914</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Scalpel Handle #3, 13cm</td>
			<td>World Precision Instruments, Inc, Sarasota, FL, USA, Inc, Sarasota, FL, USA</td>
			<td>500236</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Standard Scalpel Blade #10</td>
			<td>World Precision Instruments, Inc, Sarasota, FL, USA, Inc, Sarasota, FL, USA</td>
			<td>500239</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Zelletten cellulose swabs</td>
			<td>Lohmann und Rauscher, Neuwied, Deutschland</td>
			<td>13349</td>
			<td>5 x 4 cm&#160;</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Isoflurane</td>
			<td>AbbVie Deutschland GmbH &#38; Co</td>
			<td>N01AB06</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Iris Scissors, 11.5cm, Straight</td>
			<td>World Precision Instruments, Inc, Sarasota, FL, USA, Inc, Sarasota, FL, USA</td>
			<td>501758</td>
			<td>small scissors</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>cotton swab/cotton buds</td>
			<td>Carl Roth GmbH &#38; Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Deutschland</td>
			<td>EH12.1</td>
			<td>Rotilabo</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Kelly Hemostatic Forceps, 14cm, Straight</td>
			<td>World Precision Instruments, Inc, Sarasota, FL, USA, Inc, Sarasota, FL, USA</td>
			<td>501241</td>
			<td>surgical clamp</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>electrode plate (platinum)</td>
			<td>custom made</td>
			<td>Wissenschaftliche Werkstatt Neurozentrum Uniklinik Freiburg, Deutschland</td>
			<td>10x6 mm, 0.15 mm thickness</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>insulated copper strands (~1 mm diameter)</td>
			<td>Reichelt elektronik GmbH &#38; Co. KG, Sande, Germany</td>
			<td>LITZE BL</td>
			<td>electrode cable</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Weller EC 2002 M soldering station</td>
			<td>Weller Tools GmbH, Besigheim, Germany</td>
			<td>EC2002M1D</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Iso-Core EL 0,5 mm</td>
			<td>FELDER GMBH L&#246;ttechnik, Oberhausen, Deutschland</td>
			<td>20970510</td>
			<td>lead free solder</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>MERSILENE Polyester Fiber Suture</td>
			<td>Johnson &#38; Johnson Medical GmbH, Ethicon Deutschland, Norderstedt, Germany</td>
			<td>R871H</td>
			<td>nonabsorbable braided suture, 4-0</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Histoacryl</td>
			<td>B. Braun Melsungen AG, 
			Melsungen, Deutschland</td>
			<td>9381104</td>
			<td>cyanoacrylate</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Ketamin 10%</td>
			<td>Medistar GmbH, Germany</td>
			<td>n/a</td>
			<td>anesthetics</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Rompun 2% (Xylazine)</td>
			<td>Bayer GmbH, Germany</td>
			<td>n/a</td>
			<td>anesthetics</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>

transcranial electrical brain stimulation in alert rodents

Transcranial electrical brain stimulation can modulate cortical excitability and plasticity in humans and rodents. The most common form of stimulation in humans is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Less frequently, transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) or transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), a specific form of tACS using an electrical current applied randomly within a pre-defined frequency range, is used. The increase of noninvasive electrical brain stimulation research in humans, both for experimental and clinical purposes, has yielded an increased need for basic, mechanistic, safety studies in animals. This article describes a model for transcranial electrical brain stimulation (tES) through the intact skull targeting the motor system in alert rodents. The protocol provides step-by-step instructions for the surgical set-up of a permanent epicranial electrode socket combined with an implanted counter electrode on the chest. By placing a stimulation electrode into the epicranial socket, different electrical stimulation types, comparable to tDCS, tACS, and tRNS in humans, can be delivered. Moreover, the practical steps for tES in alert rodents are introduced. The applied current density, stimulation duration, and stimulation type may be chosen depending on the experimental needs. The caveats, advantages, and disadvantages of this set-up are discussed, as well as safety and tolerability aspects.

The described implementation of a set-up for reliable repeated tES in alert rodents can be easily integrated into mechanistic experiments, dose-response studies, or experiments including behavioral tasks. To date, the comparability of data from animal studies using (noninvasive) tES is hindered by the variability of the tES stimulation set-ups between laboratories and by differences in stimulation parameters (e.g., various current densities applied at exorbitant high levels compa...

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Transcranial Electrical Brain Stimulation in Alert Rodents at JoVE.com

Transcranial Electrical Brain Stimulation in Alert Rodents

This protocol describes a surgical set-up for a permanent epicranial electrode socket and an implanted chest electrode in rodents. By placing a second electrode into the socket, different types of transcranial electrical brain stimulation can be delivered to the motor system in alert animals through the intact skull.

Transcranial electrical brain stimulation can modulate cortical excitability and plasticity in humans and rodents. The most common form of stimulation in ...

transcranial-electrical-brain-stimulation-in-alert-rodents

Universidad de Cartagena UDEC

Research

JoVE Journal

Neuroscience

10.6K Views.  Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg. This protocol describes a surgical set-up for a permanent epicranial electrode socket and an implanted chest electrode in rodents. By placing a second electrode into the socket, different types of transcranial electrical brain stimulation can be delivered to the motor system in alert animals through the intact skull.

Video: Transcranial Electrical Brain Stimulation in Alert Rodents

Combining Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and fMRI to Examine the Default Mode Network

The default mode network is a group of brain regions that are active when an individual is not focused on the outside world and the brain is at "wakeful rest."1,2,3 It is thought the default mode network corresponds to self-referential or "internal mentation".2,3
It has been hypothesized that, in humans, activity within the default mode network is correlated with certain pathologies (for instance, hyper-activation has been linked to schizophrenia 4,5,6 and autism spectrum disorders 7 whilst hypo-activation of the network has been linked to Alzheimer's and other neurodegenerative diseases 8). As such, noninvasive modulation of this network may represent a potential therapeutic intervention for a number of neurological and psychiatric pathologies linked to abnormal network activation. One possible tool to effect this modulation is Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: a non-invasive neurostimulatory and neuromodulatory technique that can transiently or lastingly modulate cortical excitability (either increasing or decreasing it) via the application of localized magnetic field pulses.9
In order to explore the default mode network's propensity towards and tolerance of modulation, we will be combining TMS (to the left inferior parietal lobe) with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Through this article, we will examine the protocol and considerations necessary to successfully combine these two neuroscientific tools.

In this article, we examine the methodology and considerations relevant to the combination of TMS and fMRI to examine the effects of brain stimulation on the default network.

The default mode network is a group of brain regions that are active when an individual is not focused on the outside world and the brain is at "wakeful ...

TMS: Using the Theta-Burst Protocol to Explore Mechanism of Plasticity in Individuals with Fragile X Syndrome and Autism

Fragile X Syndrome (FXS), also known as Martin-Bell Syndrome, is a genetic abnormality found on the X chromosome.1,2 Individuals suffering from FXS display abnormalities in the expression of FMR1 - a protein required for typical, healthy neural development.3 Recent data has suggested that the loss of this protein can cause the cortex to be hyperexcitable thereby affecting overall patterns of neural plasticity.4,5
In addition, Fragile X shows a strong comorbidity with autism: in fact, 30% of children with FXS are diagnosed with autism, and 2 - 5% of autistic children suffer from FXS.6
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (a non-invasive neurostimulatory and neuromodulatory technique that can transiently or lastingly modulate cortical excitability via the application of localized magnetic field pulses 7,8) represents a unique method of exploring plasticity and the manifestations of FXS within affected individuals. More specifically, Theta-Burst Stimulation (TBS), a specific stimulatory protocol shown to modulate cortical plasticity for a duration up to 30 minutes after stimulation cessation in healthy populations, has already proven an efficacious tool in the exploration of abnormal plasticity.9,10 
Recent studies have shown the effects of TBS last considerably longer in individuals on the autistic spectrum - up to 90 minutes.11 This extended effect-duration suggests an underlying abnormality in the brain's natural plasticity state in autistic individuals - similar to the hyperexcitability induced by Fragile X Syndrome.
In this experiment, utilizing single-pulse motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) as our benchmark, we will explore the effects of both intermittent and continuous TBS on cortical plasticity in individuals suffering from FXS and individuals on the Autistic Spectrum.

In this article, we examine the effects of Theta-Burst TMS stimulation on cortical plasticity in individuals suffering from Fragile X syndrome and individuals on the autistic spectrum.

Fragile X Syndrome (FXS), also known as Martin-Bell Syndrome, is a genetic abnormality found on the X chromosome.1,2 Individuals suffering from FXS ...

The NeuroStar TMS Device: Conducting the FDA Approved Protocol for Treatment of Depression

The Neuronetics NeuroStar Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) System is a class II medical device that produces brief duration, pulsed magnetic fields. These rapidly alternating fields induce electrical currents within localized, targeted regions of the cortex which are associated with various physiological and functional brain changes.1,2,3
In 2007, O'Reardon et al., utilizing the NeuroStar device, published the results of an industry-sponsored, multisite, randomized, sham-stimulation controlled clinical trial in which 301 patients with major depression, who had previously failed to respond to at least one adequate antidepressant treatment trial, underwent either active or sham TMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). The patients, who were medication-free at the time of the study, received TMS five times per week over 4-6 weeks.4
The results demonstrated that a sub-population of patients (those who were relatively less resistant to medication, having failed not more than two good pharmacologic trials) showed a statistically significant improvement on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), and various other outcome measures. In October 2008, supported by these and other similar results5,6,7, Neuronetics obtained the first and only Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the clinical treatment of a specific form of medication-refractory depression using a TMS Therapy device (FDA approval K061053).
In this paper, we will explore the specified FDA approved NeuroStar depression treatment protocol (to be administered only under prescription and by a licensed medical profession in either an in- or outpatient setting).

In this article, we examine the methodology and considerations relevant to the FDA approved depression treatment protocol using the Neuronetics NeuroStar TMS device.

The Neuronetics NeuroStar Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) System is a class II medical device that produces brief duration, pulsed magnetic ...

Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a technique that has been intensively investigated in the past decade as this method offers a non-invasive and safe alternative to change cortical excitability2. The effects of one session of tDCS can last for several minutes, and its effects depend on polarity of stimulation, such as that cathodal stimulation induces a decrease in cortical excitability, and anodal stimulation induces an increase in cortical excitability that may last beyond the duration of stimulation6. These effects have been explored in cognitive neuroscience and also clinically in a variety of neuropsychiatric disorders &#x2013; especially when applied over several consecutive sessions4. One area that has been attracting attention of neuroscientists and clinicians is the use of tDCS for modulation of pain-related neural networks3,5. Modulation of two main cortical areas in pain research has been explored: primary motor cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex7. Due to the critical role of electrode montage, in this article, we show different alternatives for electrode placement for tDCS clinical trials on pain; discussing advantages and disadvantages of each method of stimulation.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an established technique to modulate cortical excitability1,2. It has been used as an investigative tool in neuroscience due to its effects on cortical plasticity, easy operation, and safe profile. One area that tDCS has been showing encouraging results is pain alleviation 3-5.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a technique that has been intensively investigated in the past decade as this method offers a ...

Deep Brain Stimulation with Simultaneous fMRI in Rodents

In order to visualize the global and downstream neuronal responses to deep brain stimulation (DBS) at various targets, we have developed a protocol for using blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to image rodents with simultaneous DBS. DBS fMRI presents a number of technical challenges, including accuracy of electrode implantation, MR artifacts created by the electrode, choice of anesthesia and paralytic to minimize any neuronal effects while simultaneously eliminating animal motion, and maintenance of physiological parameters, deviation from which can confound the BOLD signal.&#160;Our laboratory has developed a set of procedures that are capable of overcoming most of these possible issues. For electrical stimulation, a homemade tungsten bipolar microelectrode is used, inserted stereotactically at the stimulation site in the anesthetized subject. In preparation for imaging, rodents are fixed on a plastic headpiece and transferred to the magnet bore. For sedation and paralysis during scanning, a cocktail of dexmedetomidine and pancuronium is continuously infused, along with a minimal dose of isoflurane; this preparation minimizes the BOLD ceiling effect of volatile anesthetics. In this example experiment, stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) produces BOLD responses which are observed primarily in ipsilateral cortical regions, centered in motor cortex. Simultaneous DBS and fMRI allows the unambiguous modulation of neural circuits dependent on stimulation location and stimulation parameters, and permits observation of neuronal modulations free of regional bias. This technique may be used to explore the downstream effects of modulating neural circuitry at nearly any brain region, with implications for both experimental and clinical DBS.

This protocol describes a standard method for simultaneous functional magnetic resonance imaging and deep brain stimulation in the rodent. The combined use of these experimental tools allows for the exploration of global downstream activity in response to electrical stimulation at virtually any brain target.

In order to visualize the global and downstream neuronal responses to deep brain stimulation (DBS) at various targets, we have developed a protocol for ...

Acrylic Resin Molding Based Head Fixation Technique in Rodents

Head fixation is a technique of immobilizing animal's head by attaching a head-post on the skull for rigid clamping. Traditional head fixation requires surgical attachment of metallic frames on the skull. The attached frames are then clamped to a stationary platform resulting in immobilization of the head. However, metallic frames for head fixation have been technically difficult to design and implement in general laboratory environment. In this study, we provide a novel head fixation method. Using a custom-made head fixation bar, head mounter is constructed during implantation surgery. After the application of acrylic resin for affixing implants such as electrodes and cannula on the skull, additional resins applied on top of that to build a mold matching to the port of the fixation bar. The molded head mounter serves as a guide rails, investigators conveniently fixate the animal&#8217;s head by inserting the head mounter into the port of the fixation bar. This method could be easily applicable if implantation surgery using dental acrylics is necessary and might be useful for laboratories that cannot easily fabricate CNC machined metal head-posts.

Traditional head fixation techniques have used metallic frames attached on the skull as an interface for head fixation apparatus. This protocol demonstrates a frameless, acrylic resin molding based head fixation technique for behavioral tasks in rodents.

Head fixation is a technique of immobilizing animal's head by attaching a head-post on the skull for rigid clamping. Traditional head fixation requires ...

Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex by Online Combined Approach with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) is a neuromodulatory technique able to act through sinusoidal electrical waveforms in a specific frequency and in turn modulate ongoing cortical oscillatory activity. This neurotool allows the establishment of a causal link between endogenous oscillatory activity and behavior. Most of the tACS studies have shown online effects of tACS. However, little is known about the underlying action mechanisms of this technique because of the AC-induced artifacts on Electroencephalography (EEG) signals. Here we show a unique approach to investigate online physiological frequency-specific effects of tACS of the primary motor cortex (M1) by using single pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to probe cortical excitability changes. In our setup, the TMS coil is placed over the tACS electrode while Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) are collected to test the effects of the ongoing M1-tACS. So far, this approach has mainly been used to study the visual and motor systems. However, the current tACS-TMS setup can pave the way for future investigations of cognitive functions. Therefore, we provide a step-by-step manual and video guidelines for the procedure.

Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) allows the modulation of cortical excitability in a frequency-specific fashion. Here we show a unique approach which combines online tACS with single pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) in order to "probe" cortical excitability by means of Motor Evoked Potentials.

Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) is a neuromodulatory technique able to act through sinusoidal electrical waveforms in a specific ...

Chronic Transcranial Electrical Stimulation and Intracortical Recording in Rats

Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) is a powerful and relatively simple approach to diffusely influence brain activity either randomly or in a closed-loop event-triggered manner. Although many studies are focusing on the possible benefits and side-effects of TES in healthy and pathologic brains, there are still many fundamental open questions regarding the mechanism of action of the stimulation. Therefore, there is a clear need for a robust and reproducible method to test the acute and the chronic effects of TES in rodents. TES can be combined with regular behavioral, electrophysiological, and imaging techniques to investigate neuronal networks in vivo. The implantation of transcranial stimulation electrodes does not impose extra constraints on the experimental design while it offers a versatile, flexible tool to manipulate brain activity. Here we provide a detailed, step-by-step protocol to fabricate and implant transcranial stimulation electrodes to influence brain activity in a temporally constrained manner for months.

This detailed protocol describes transcranial stimulation electrode placement on the temporal bone in order to investigate the short- and long-term effects of transcranial electrical stimulation in freely moving rats.

Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) is a powerful and relatively simple approach to diffusely influence brain activity either randomly or in a ...

Combined Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive method that produces neural excitation in the cortex by means of brief, time-varying magnetic field pulses. The initiation of cortical activation or its modulation depends on the background activation of the neurons of the cortical region activated, the characteristics of the coil, its position and its orientation with respect to the head. TMS combined with simultaneous electrocephalography (EEG) and neuronavigation (nTMS-EEG) allows for the assessment of cortico-cortical excitability and connectivity in almost all cortical areas in a reproducible manner. This advance makes nTMS-EEG a powerful tool that can accurately assess brain dynamics and neurophysiology in test-retest paradigms that are required for clinical trials. Limitations of this method include artifacts that cover the initial brain reactivity to stimulation. Thus, the process of removing artifacts may also extract valuable information. Moreover, the optimal parameters for dorsolateral prefrontal (DLPFC) stimulation are not fully known and current protocols utilize variations from the motor cortex (M1) stimulation paradigms. However, evolving nTMS-EEG designs hope to address these issues. The protocol presented here introduces some standard practices for assessing neurophysiological functioning from stimulation to the DLPFC that can be applied in patients with treatment resistant psychiatric disorders that receive treatment such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), magnetic seizure therapy (MST) or electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).

The protocol presented here is for TMS-EEG studies utilizing intracortical excitability test-retest design paradigms. The intent of the protocol is to produce reliable and reproducible cortical excitability measures for assessing neurophysiological functioning related to therapeutic interventions in the treatment of neuropsychiatric diseases such as major depression.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive method that produces neural excitation in the cortex by means of brief, time-varying magnetic ...

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Mice

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique proposed as an alternative or complementary treatment for several neuropsychiatric diseases. The biological effects of tDCS are not fully understood, which is in part explained due to the difficulty in obtaining human brain tissue. This protocol describes a tDCS mouse model that uses a chronically implanted electrode allowing the study of the long-lasting biological effects of tDCS. In this experimental model, tDCS changes the cortical gene expression and offers a prominent contribution to the understanding of the rationale for its therapeutic use.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS in Mice

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a therapeutic technique proposed to treat psychiatric diseases. An animal model is essential for understanding the specific biological alterations evoked by tDCS. This protocol describes a tDCS mouse model that uses a chronically implanted electrode.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique proposed as an alternative or complementary treatment for ...