We thank the Queensland Brain Institute (QBI) Animal Behaviour Facility for the development and maintenance of the apparatus described in this manuscript.

All animal procedures were approved by The University of Queensland Animal Ethics Committee under the guidelines of the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (approval number: QBI/189/15).
1. APA room setup
NOTE: The APA apparatus comprises an elevated arena with a metal grid floor enclosed by a 32 cm-high transparent circular boundary. The metal bars are evenly spaced (0.5 cm apart) and have 0.3 cm diameter.
<ol>
	<li>Ensure the APA apparatus is within the camera frame mounted on the ceiling. Track the mouse using commercially available animal tracking software.</li>
	<li>The APA arena generally rotates at 1 rpm speed, and a pre-designated 60&#176; stationary shock zone is set within the rotating arena. When the mouse enters the shock zone, deliver a mild foot shock of 0.5 mA (60 Hz, 500 ms).</li>
	<li>Ensure that the location of the shock zone remains constant during testing and is set electronically within the experimental setup. The rotating arena carries the mouse into the shock zone unless the mouse actively moves to avoid it.</li>
	<li>Place four novel visual cues on four different room walls at the same height as the rotating platform, typically 30-50 cm away from the arena. Ensure the cues are neutral colors, such as black-and-white symbols or shapes printed on A3 paper and laminated for easy cleaning (Figure 1A).</li>
	<li>Ensure that the light intensity of the room is between 30-70 Lux. Increasing light intensity induces anxiety-like behavior and reduces exploration.</li>
	<li>Before starting, open the Tracker program and select the APA task.</li>
	<li>In the Options for Tracker 2D, select the Experiment tab. Here, ensure that Place Avoidance- One Frame- Position Only is selected. This will allow configuring the parameters required. Save the configuration file and adjust as required.</li>
	<li>In the Experiment tab set the experiment duration in the Experiment Time box. A typical experiment duration is 600 s or 10 min.</li>
	<li>Make sure the Enable Timer is selected. Change the shock parameters in the Timer region as discussed above.</li>
	<li>Enter the common experimental details in the space provided in the Room Frame region of the Experiment tab. For example, ensure that the Default Output File name is populated with the date, a simple experimental identifier, and the day of testing. Finish the name with an underscore &#34;_&#34; to allow the addition of a unique mouse ID during the experiment.</li>
	<li>In the Room Frame region is also the Targets tab. Click the Edit button to provide the ability to ensure the entire arena is included in the region of interest. Then, select Arc to provide the adjustable parameters for the size and location of the shock target zone (Figure 1B).</li>
	<li>Open the Tracking tab to adjust the parameters to ensure successful mice tracking. The contrast box has either Dark or Light options to allow for both dark (e.g., C57Bl/6) or light (e.g., BALB/c) mice. This creates an effective contrast between the background and the mice. When using albino strains of mice, place a piece of black plastic under the arena to allow for this contrast to be achieved (Figure 2).</li>
	<li>Set the mice size and area ranges in this region. Set these parameters to effectively recognize the mouse when in the arena. Alternatively, set these after pressing the From Calibrator button.</li>
	<li>Select the From Calibrator button to ensure the arena is completely in the region of interest mask.
	<ol>
		<li>Start the arena in this tab to make sure that when the arena rotates, the arena remains in the mask. This tab is also critical to select the appropriate contrast threshold. Move the red line in the Threshold pane to adjust the contrast threshold. 
		NOTE: Figure 3A shows an optimal threshold selection, as evidenced by a solid orange region and a blue &#34;X&#34; where the mouse is located. A poor threshold is shown in Figure 3B and shows only speckled orange and no &#34;X&#34;.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Use the Devices tab and set the rotation direction and speed of the arena using the velocity button. Select both positive and negative velocities, representing clockwise and anti-clockwise rotations. Set the shock intensity in the Current Source section. The most common setting for mice is 1 rpm rotation and a 0.5 mA shock.</li>
	<li>Alter how or when to deliver the shocks within the Current Source tab.
	<ol>
		<li>Ensure the Current mode is selected to Track Dependent. This will provide an electric shock when the mouse moves into the shock zone.</li>
		<li>Select Time to give shocks at a time interval set by the user. Use previously recorded tracks to shock a mouse by selecting From File. This is to provide a yoked control mouse subjected to an identical number of shocks at the same duration and intensity independent of spatial learning. 
		NOTE: The File Output and Window tabs allow data and video files to be saved in a specific directory. The From Image button within the File Output tab also allows the region of interest to capture the entire arena to be selected.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Retreat behind the curtain and begin the trial. The experimenter&#39;s presence close to the arena and any unnecessary noise may affect animal performance.</li>
	<li>Ensure that any noise and odor are limited during the trial, which can provide the mouse another cue, affecting their performance. Examples to minimise this include ensuring a closed clinical waste bin, using rooms removed from noisy lab spaces, and thoroughly cleaning the equipment between mice. Researchers may consider using the white noise generator to mask unrelated external noises.</li>
	<li>Let the home cage bedding remain the same throughout the behavioral testing period, as this may provide new stimulation and affect the behavior.</li>
	<li>To avoid diurnal variations, conduct testing at a consistent time each day.</li>
</ol>
2. Habituation to experimenter handling
<ol>
	<li>Handle each mouse daily for 30 s to 1 min for at least 2-3 days before the testing. Animal handling significantly reduces stress and anxiety-related behavior during testing.</li>
	<li>Use the same lab coat and avoid wearing strong deodorants, colognes, or perfume during the habituation and testing.</li>
</ol>
3. Habituation to the APA arena (1 day)
<ol>
	<li>Bring the mouse into the anteroom or testing room for habituation. Leave the mouse to habituate for a minimum of 30 min. Set the light intensity in the anteroom or testing room before mice are brought in to habituate.</li>
	<li>Set up the Tracker software.
	<ol>
		<li>Create an experiment-specific folder. Depending on the experimental paradigm, have separate folders for each day or trial. Set up experiment configurations as described above and save these configurations to use in the future.</li>
		<li>Before starting a trial, open the saved configuration by clicking the File tab, then click the Save symbol, add a unique mouse ID in the newly opened window, and run the trial by pressing the Play tab.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Habituate the mouse to the APA apparatus by exposing it to the rotating arena for 5 min without delivering shocks.</li>
	<li>Remove the mouse from the home cage by lifting it from the tail&#39;s base and gently placing it onto the gloved hand. Transport the mouse to the APA apparatus and place it away from the shock zone, facing the wall.</li>
	<li>Retreat behind the curtain and begin the trial.</li>
	<li>At the end of the testing, remove the mouse and return to the home cage.</li>
	<li>Collect all urine and scat, and clean the grid thoroughly with 80% (v/v) ethanol.</li>
	<li>Repeat steps 3.4-3.7 for all mice.</li>
</ol>
4. Acquisition training using APA (1-6 days)
<ol>
	<li>Set the room lighting to identical conditions as on the habituation day.</li>
	<li>Bring the mouse into the anteroom or testing room and allow it to habituate for a minimum of 30 min.</li>
	<li>Set up the Tracker software as described above.</li>
	<li>Set the duration of the trial.</li>
	<li>Ensure the current source is on and set (i.e., 0.5 mA).</li>
	<li>Place the mouse on the arena away from the shock zone and facing the wall.</li>
	<li>Retreat behind the curtain and begin the trial by pressing the Play button. Monitor the mouse on the computer screen and intervene if required. For example, the mouse is not receiving shocks or appears overly stressed, as evidenced by excessive jumping or vocalizing.</li>
	<li>At the end of the testing, remove the mouse and return to the home cage. 
	&#8203;NOTE: Make sure mice are receiving and reacting to the shocks. Mice respond to the shock by rearing back and vocalizing. If this is not the case, they may not be receiving the shock. This could be due to scat on the grid or due to inadequate tracking. Therefore, cleaning the grid after each trial and optimizing the mouse tracking, as discussed above, is essential.</li>
</ol>
5. Reversal acquisition training (Optional, 1-6 days)
<ol>
	<li>In the reversal task, reposition the shock zone to a new location, generally 180&#176; from the previous position. Assess the mouse&#39;s ability to flexibly learn a novel shock zone location. The room cues are typically not changed during reversal learning.</li>
	<li>Repeat steps 3.4-3.7 for all mice.</li>
</ol>
6. Probe trial (Optional, 1 day)
<ol>
	<li>In the probe trial, measure the time to the first entrance and/or the maximum time avoiding the shock zone. 
	NOTE: This indicates memory consolidation after the acquisition phase. A well-trained mouse will avoid entering the shock zone for a prolonged period (&#62;60 secs), showing evidence of spatial learning.</li>
	<li>Set the room light intensity as on the acquisition training day.</li>
	<li>Habituate the mouse in the testing room or anteroom for 30 min.</li>
	<li>Set up the Tracker software.</li>
	<li>Set the trial duration to the same time as the testing period previously conducted (for example, 10 min or 30 min, depending on trial parameters).</li>
	<li>Do not deliver shocks for this trial.</li>
	<li>Place the mouse on the opposite side of the aversive shock zone, facing the wall.</li>
	<li>Start the trial and retreat behind the curtain.</li>
	<li>Make sure the mouse is tracked efficiently.</li>
	<li>Monitor the mouse on the computer screen and stop the trial when it enters the shock zone. Some researchers prefer to continue the trial for 5 min to see if the mouse continues to return to the shock zone.</li>
	<li>Gently pick up the mouse and return to the home cage.</li>
	<li>Ensure all urine and scat are collected, and the grid is thoroughly cleaned with 80% (v/v) ethanol.</li>
</ol>
7. Track analysis
NOTE: The performance of the task can be achieved via different tracking software. Below is how the included software is used to determine the performance during the APA task. In this instance, the data is analyzed using the Track Analysis program.
<ol>
	<li>To analyze the data, open the Track Analysis program and select Avoidance from the dropdown menu in the main window.</li>
	<li>Click on Add Task to upload the data files saved during the acquisition phase in a new window. In Group Name, create a group to analyze, e.g., Day 1 or time of analysis.</li>
	<li>Click the Output Directory to select the location to save the analyzed data.</li>
	<li>Add the files to be analyzed by clicking on the Add Files tab and selecting the files from the local drive.</li>
	<li>Set the time to be analyzed by clicking the Set Time tab. This provides the ability to define the period which will be analyzed, i.e., 0 to 600 s. Alternatively, analyze the data in bins, i.e., 60 s.</li>
	<li>Once all tracks are added, click the Analysis tab and select Run Analysis to analyze the data. The analysis will produce several folders. The data for analysis will be in the TBLfiles folder. Open these data files in a spreadsheet and use them for further analysis, i.e., pairwise comparison or repeated measures ANOVA. 
	NOTE: The analysis will also produce other folders, including PS files that will have a single-page description of the mice during testing, showing a trace map and where the shocks were received.</li>
</ol>

Understanding Spatial Learning in Mice Using the Active Place Avoidance Test

<ol>
	<li>Cimadevilla, J. M., Fenton, A. A., Bures, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Functional+inactivation+of+dorsal+hippocampus+impairs+active+place+avoidance+in+rats.">Functional inactivation of dorsal hippocampus impairs active place avoidance in rats.</a> Neurosci Lett. 285 (1), 53-56 (2000).</li><li>Willis, E. F., Bartlett, P. F., Vukovic, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Protocol+for+short-+and+longer-term+spatial+learning+and+memory+in+mice.">Protocol for short- and longer-term spatial learning and memory in mice.</a> Front Behav Neurosci. 11, 197 (2017).</li><li>Blackmore, D. G., Brici, D., Walker, T. L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Protocol+for+three+alternative+paradigms+to+test+spatial+learning+and+memory+in+mice.">Protocol for three alternative paradigms to test spatial learning and memory in mice.</a> STAR Protoc. 3 (3), 101500 (2022).</li><li>Pastalkova, E., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Storage+of+spatial+information+by+the+maintenance+mechanism+of+LTP.">Storage of spatial information by the maintenance mechanism of LTP.</a> Science. 313 (5790), 1141-1144 (2006).</li><li>Stuchlik, A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Place+avoidance+tasks+as+tools+in+the+behavioral+neuroscience+of+learning+and+memory.">Place avoidance tasks as tools in the behavioral neuroscience of learning and memory.</a> Physiol Res. 62 (Suppl 1), S1-S19 (2013).</li><li>Vukovic, J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Immature+doublecortin-positive+hippocampal+neurons+are+important+for+learning+but+not+for+remembering.">Immature doublecortin-positive hippocampal neurons are important for learning but not for remembering.</a> J Neurosci. 33 (15), 6603-6613 (2013).</li><li>Blackmore, D. G., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=An+exercise+&amp;#34;sweet+spot&amp;#34;+reverses+cognitive+deficits+of+aging+by+growth-hormone-induced+neurogenesis.">An exercise &amp;#34;sweet spot&amp;#34; reverses cognitive deficits of aging by growth-hormone-induced neurogenesis.</a> iScience. 24 (11), 103275 (2021).</li><li>Codd, L. N., Blackmore, D. G., Vukovic, J., Bartlett, P. F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Exercise+reverses+learning+deficits+induced+by+hippocampal+injury+by+promoting+neurogenesis.">Exercise reverses learning deficits induced by hippocampal injury by promoting neurogenesis.</a> Sci Rep. 10 (1), 19269 (2020).</li><li>Harrison, F. E., Hosseini, A. H., McDonald, M. P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Endogenous+anxiety+and+stress+responses+in+water+maze+and+Barnes+maze+spatial+memory+tasks.">Endogenous anxiety and stress responses in water maze and Barnes maze spatial memory tasks.</a> Behav Brain Res. 198 (1), 247-251 (2009).</li><li>van Praag, H., Shubert, T., Zhao, C., Gage, F. H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Exercise+enhances+learning+and+hippocampal+neurogenesis+in+aged+mice.">Exercise enhances learning and hippocampal neurogenesis in aged mice.</a> J Neurosci. 25 (38), 8680-8685 (2005).</li><li>Zhou, X. A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Neurogenic-dependent+changes+in+hippocampal+circuitry+underlie+the+procognitive+effect+of+exercise+in+aging+mice.">Neurogenic-dependent changes in hippocampal circuitry underlie the procognitive effect of exercise in aging mice.</a> iScience. 24 (12), 103450 (2021).</li><li>Leinenga, G., Gotz, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Scanning+ultrasound+removes+amyloid-&#946;+and+restores+memory+in+an+Alzheimer's+disease+mouse+model.">Scanning ultrasound removes amyloid-&#946; and restores memory in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model.</a> Sci Transl Med. 7 (278), 278ra33 (2015).</li><li>Willis, E. F., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Repopulating+microglia+promote+brain+repair+in+an+IL-6-dependent+manner.">Repopulating microglia promote brain repair in an IL-6-dependent manner.</a> Cell. 180 (5), 833-846 (2020).</li><li>Lesburgueres, E., Sparks, F. T., O'Reilly, K. C., Fenton, A. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Active+place+avoidance+is+no+more+stressful+than+unreinforced+exploration+of+a+familiar+environment.">Active place avoidance is no more stressful than unreinforced exploration of a familiar environment.</a> Hippocampus. 26 (12), 1481-1485 (2016).</li><li>Crawley, J. N. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Behavioral+phenotyping+strategies+for+mutant+mice.">Behavioral phenotyping strategies for mutant mice.</a> Neuron. 57 (6), 809-818 (2008).</li></ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

In conclusion, the active place avoidance test is an effective spatial learning task that can be used on a variety of mouse strains and experimental conditions. The APA task overcomes limitations associated with other spatial learning paradigms14, such as the MWM, which is stressful for the mice as measured by cortisol levels9. The MWM is also unsuitable for aged mice, where they have been reported to float during the task10. Although other spatial learning tests, such as the Barnes maze and novel object location test, are less stressful, they are limited by how often repeat testing can be conducted on the same cohort of mice. Therefore, the main advantage of the APA task is that it can be used multiple times as several parameters can be adjusted to maintain novelty. Indeed, we have used the APA task up to 5 times on the same cohort of mice to examine the effect of hippocampal ablation and the subsequent effect of exercise8. In each instance, the parameters, including the arena rotation, shock zone, and spatial cues, were altered between tests. This was effective in ensuring that the mice used spatial navigation cues to re-learn the task as evidenced by the control animals starting with a high number of shocks and then decreasing during subsequent test days for each testing period8. Typically, at the end of a 5-day test paradigm, we consider that any animal that received more than 10 shocks on the final day or has a maximum avoidance of less than 60 s has not learned the paradigm.
Beyond the ability to easily modify settings to allow multiple rounds of spatial testing, the APA task ensures that mice must use spatial navigation to effectively avoid the shock zone. For example, animals must use external cues to locate and avoid entering the stationary shock zone by navigating away from it5. As the arena is rotating, animals are not able to use an idiothetic approach for navigation, nor can they use exteroceptive cues such as odor because these cues rotate with the arena while the shock zone and spatial cues remain stationary5.
It is also important to ensure that mice are appropriately habituated to the researcher and APA arena. The intensity of foot shock also needs to be optimized, as both too low and too high shock intensity can compromise mice&#39;s ability to learn and perform the task5. The shock intensity is typically set to 0.5 mA and should not exceed 0.7 mA. For animals that have increased anxiety-like behavior, consider reducing both light intensity and foot shock intensity. Increased anxiety during the APA task can present as either excessive jumping, uncontrolled running within the arena, or prolonged freezing. The protocol described here used a shock intensity of 0.5 mA, the same intensity that has previously been used with BALB/c, which is known to have higher anxiety-like behavior15.
Here, we describe the animal tracking software supplied by the company that provided the active place avoidance rig used. Alternative video tracking software is also suitable for analyzing behavioral performance. These programs can also accurately measure and analyze mouse performance during APA tasks. These programs allow the creation of several zones and locations within the APA arena to assess behavior. The arena setting for an APA consists of one triangular shock zone, where the number of entrances, time to first enter, and time spent in the shock zone are measured. Additional zones can also be added within the arena. For example, we can add a central zone or a zone opposite the shock zone to measure the time spent, and distance traveled in those zones as an animal strategy to avoid the aversive zone. These programs track the mouse center of mass, which is then saved and displayed above the reference frame for visual inspection (Figure 6A,B). Finally, it is also possible to create a density heatmap for individual and group performance (Figure 6C).
When conducting the APA task, there are potential issues that need to be addressed. On occasion, mice will need to be excluded from the analysis due to non-responsiveness to the shock zone. As always, exclusion should only be considered when they meet pre-defined outlier conditions, for example, falling outside 2 standard deviations from the mean. Complex behavioral tasks such as the APA typically require high N values of animals. We suggest conducting a power analysis to calculate the appropriate sample size before conducting APA. This will depend on the strain used and treatment groups. From experience, we find that an n value of 10 or more for each group provides sufficient power when conducting APA experiments. The main issue with this task is ensuring high-quality tracking of the mouse during the task. The habituation stage of the task should be used to confirm that this is occurring. Mice not responding to a shock is often due to scat between the grid bars. It is, therefore, essential to clean the rig after every animal and remove any scat or urine. This will also reduce the stress for the animals that follow. The APA task typically involves a 5-day paradigm, which may present some limitations for studies involving interventions effective less than 5 days; however, short-term memory or spatial learning acquisition can still be assessed for such studies using the 30 min, single-session approach.
In summary, this article provides a detailed description of how to set up and use the active place avoidance paradigm to test the spatial learning of mice. The ability to change conditions so that multiple mouse strains of varying color can be tested is a distinct advantage over other, more traditional spatial tests such as the MWM. Further, the modification of multiple parameters allows for repeat testing so that the changes in spatial learning can be accurately compared during various experimental paradigms or during physiological aging. In a short period of time, the APA test has been demonstrated to be an accurate and effective alternative for hippocampus-dependent spatial learning. In the future, the APA task can be used as a reliable method for assessing therapeutic or exercise interventions on cognitive and spatial behavior in both wild-type and transgenic mice.

Active place avoidance (APA) is an effective tool to test hippocampus-dependent spatial learning in rodents1,2,3,4. During the APA task, the animal is placed on a rotating arena and is required to use visual cues to orientate themselves and avoid an aversive shock zone5. The rotation of the arena ensures that the mouse is unable to use an idiothetic approach for navigation, nor can scent marks be used, as these cues rotate on the platform while the shock zone remains stationary5. Altering the speed and direction of the arena, as well as the location of the shock zone and visual cues, allows for the re-testing of mice multiple times6,7,8. The APA offers several distinct advantages compared to the Morris water maze (MWM), one of the most widely used spatial learning tests. Importantly, mice have an aversion to swimming and find the MWM task extremely stressful9. Further, aged mice have been reported to float during the MWM task10, making it unsuitable as a spatial learning task in many instances. Further, as the MWM task requires a hidden, submerged platform for the mice to locate during testing. This necessitates the water to be opaque, which is typically achieved via the addition of white paint. Tracking and analysis of animals during behavioral tasks requires sufficient contrast between subject and surrounds, excluding certain mouse strains such as Swiss or BALB/c from being tested in the MWM. In the APA task, this issue is circumvented through the addition of black plastic under the grid.
Multiple APA paradigms have been designed to test spatial learning, demonstrating its utility as an effective behavioral tool. For example, acquisition, retention, and consolidation of spatial learning is typically accomplished by daily testing of animals that can range from 3-5 days6,7,11,12. Memory and learning are quantified by comparing the number of shocks received each acquisition day. Time to first entrance and the maximum time avoiding the shock zone are also important parameters that can be used to determine changes in learning ability during the task. Alternatively, spatial working memory can be tested by conducting a single, 30 min APA session2,13 where spatial learning is measured as within-session changes by comparing performance, such as shock number, in 5 min bins.
In this article, we describe the APA task and highlight the key features that must be considered when conducting this spatial learning test.

<table><tbody><tr><td>Constant Current Source CS02</td><td>BioSignal Group</td><td>N/A</td><td>Acton, Massachusetts, United States</td></tr><tr><td>Control Box</td><td>BioSignal Group</td><td>N/A</td><td>Acton, Massachusetts, United States</td></tr><tr><td>Ethovision</td><td>Noldus</td><td>version 16</td><td>Wageningen, Netherlands</td></tr><tr><td>Shock Scrambler</td><td>BioSignal Group</td><td>N/A</td><td>Acton, Massachusetts, United States</td></tr><tr><td>Track Analysis</td><td>BioSignal Group</td><td>version 2.2</td><td>Acton, Massachusetts, United States</td></tr><tr><td>Tracker Programme</td><td>BioSignal Group</td><td>version: 2.36</td><td>Acton, Massachusetts, United States</td></tr></tbody></table>

the active place avoidance (apa) test, an effective, versatile and repeatable spatial learning task for mice

Hippocampus-dependent spatial learning in rodents has been tested using a variety of methods. These include the Morris water maze (MWM), Y-maze, and novel object location (NOL) tasks. More recently, the active place avoidance (APA) task has been developed as an alternative to these more traditional approaches. In the APA task, mice must use spatial cues placed around a rotating arena to avoid a stationary shock zone. Due to the multiple parameters that can be adjusted, the APA task has been demonstrated to be a very versatile approach. It lends itself to being used longitudinally and repeatedly for the same cohort of mice. Here, we provide a detailed protocol to successfully conduct the APA task. We also highlight alternative APA approaches that can be used to examine different components of spatial learning. We describe the data collection and analysis processes. Critical steps during the APA task are discussed to increase the likelihood of successfully conducting the test. The APA task has several advantages over more traditional spatial navigation tests. It is appropriate to use with aged mice or those with disease phenotypes such as Alzheimer's disease. The complexity of the task can be easily altered, allowing a wide range of mouse strains to be tested. Further, the APA task is suitable for testing animals that have undergone surgery or experimental interventions that may have affected motor or neural function, such as stroke or traumatic brain injury.

Mice with intact spatial learning ability will show a decrease in the number of shocks during successive acquisition trials (Figure 4A). Similarly, the maximum time avoiding the shock zone will increase as the mouse learns to successfully navigate away from the shock zone (Figure 4B). However, mice that are unable to learn an effective avoidance strategy will show a constant number of shocks for each acquisition trial (Figure 4A). Often, mice that fail to identify the shock zone will receive multiple shocks during each entrance into the zone. Trace maps are useful to provide examples of mice that learn to avoid the shock zone (Figure 4C) and those that are unable to avoid the shock zone (Figure 4D). In both instances, these trace maps represent the final day of acquisition. The mouse in Figure 4C received only 2 shocks, as represented by the two circles. Also, note that the trace map shows the mouse spending most of the time on the opposite side of the shock zone which is represented by the red wedge. Conversely, the mouse in Figure 4D received more shocks, and the trace map reveals a disordered pattern. Examples of mice that are unable to successfully learn to avoid the shock zone are those that have reduced hippocampal neurogenesis either due to older age, as shown by the 18-month-old mice (Figure 4A,B- modified from Blackmore et al., 20217), chemical ablation of immature neurons6 or hippocampal lesions (see Codd et al., 2020)8.
It is important to distinguish between an unsuccessful trial due to the mouse failing to learn as opposed to a failure in the set-up of the equipment. The two most common causes for poor results due to equipment failure are poor tracking of the mouse (Figure 5A) or the mouse not receiving a shock. Poor tracking can prevent the mouse from receiving a shock when it is in the shock zone. Alternatively, poor tracking can inaccurately induce a shock when the mouse is not in the zone. In both instances, this will prevent the mouse from developing an effective avoidance strategy. Poor tracking can be solved by adjusting the threshold in the &#34;From Calibrator&#34; tab. Poor tracking is typically defined as more than 1000 bad frames during a 10-min period and occurs very rarely. Poor tracking can become an issue with aged mice, where alopecia can develop. When receiving a shock, the mouse will react either by tensing or, on occasion, vocalizing. The mouse will typically move, if even slightly, and can be seen on the live tracking software. When the mouse stays perfectly still within the shock zone, a clear line of shocks will be shown (Figure 5B). This may be due to the shock box not being turned on or scat stuck between the bars, reducing the amplitude of the shock being delivered to the animal.
<img alt="Figure 1" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/65935/65935fig01.jpg" /> 
Figure 1: APA apparatus, behavior room, and shock zone setting. (A) An example of the testing arena and room setup. APA apparatus is elevated and placed in the center of the room, surrounded by novel visual cues. Black and white visual cues are used at the same height as the platform. (B). The Target function within the Experiment tab allows the masking of the entire arena and creates a location of the shock zone. A shock zone, represented by the red wedge, has been created at 270&#176; in this example. <a href="https://jove.unicartagenaproxy.elogim.com/files/ftp_upload/65935/65935fig01large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Figure 2" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/65935/65935fig02.jpg" /> 
Figure 2: APA setup for albino mouse strains. The APA arena can be set up for albino strains of mice, such as BALB/c, by selecting the Light option in the Tracking tab and creating a black arena background. An albino mouse on a black background achieves high contrast and offers better mouse tracking. <a href="https://jove.unicartagenaproxy.elogim.com/files/ftp_upload/65935/65935fig02large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Figure 3" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/65935/65935fig03.jpg" /> 
Figure 3: Adjusting the threshold for mouse tracking is essential. The threshold must be appropriately adjusted to ensure good animal tracking during the trial. The threshold is adjusted by moving the red line in the threshold pane in the From Calibrator tab. (A) An example of a good threshold selection with a solid orange region and a blue X on the object. (B) A poor threshold with speckled orange. Poor tracking leads to the loss of an animal in the arena or prevents the mouse from receiving a shock when it is in the shock zone. <a href="https://jove.unicartagenaproxy.elogim.com/files/ftp_upload/65935/65935fig03large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Figure 4" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/65935/65935fig04.jpg" /> 
Figure 4: Comparison of performance between young (10 weeks) and older (18 months) mice on a 5-day learning paradigm and Trace maps. (A) The 10-week-old mice received significantly fewer shocks compared to the 18-month-old mice during 5 days of testing; note that the difference in the number of shocks received was minimal on the first day of testing between the groups, but young mice with intact memory learned to avoid the entry into shock zone more quickly than the older group. (B) Maximum time avoidance was computed as the maximum time spent avoiding the shock during the 10 min trial. The younger mice rapidly learned to avoid entry into the shock zone compared with older mice, suggesting the young mice are learning effectively. (C) The mouse in this trace map received only two shocks, as represented by the two circles in this acquisition trial. This mouse also spent more time in the arena opposite the shock zone, which is represented by the red wedge. (D) This mouse received more shocks and spent more time close to the shock zone, suggesting that spatial learning was not achieved in this mouse. Two-way, repeat measure ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc tests were used to test significance. ****p&#60;0.0001. Panels A and B were modified from Blackmore et al.7. <a href="https://jove.unicartagenaproxy.elogim.com/files/ftp_upload/65935/65935fig04large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Figure 5" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/65935/65935fig05.jpg" /> 
Figure 5: Trace maps provide important information for each mouse during each trial. (A) Note the straight lines that are present in this example of tracking. This is due to the tracking software incorrectly identifying a mouse during the task. (B) An example of good tracking during the trial. <a href="https://jove.unicartagenaproxy.elogim.com/files/ftp_upload/65935/65935fig05large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Figure 6" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/65935/65935fig06.jpg" /> 
Figure 6: Track visualization and heatmap on different animal tracking programs. Both (A) Program 1 and (B) Program 2 detect the animal&#39;s location and movement to create track plots to visually inspect if the animal learns the task or the effect of experimental treatment. Both programs show identical track plots from an animal who learned the task efficiently. (C) A heatmap can also be created, which facilitates the identification of hotspots and clustering of the data points. <a href="https://jove.unicartagenaproxy.elogim.com/files/ftp_upload/65935/65935fig06large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about The Active Place Avoidance APA Test, an Effective, Versatile and Repeatable Spatial Learning Task for Mice at JoVE.com

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Aging on Hippocampal-Dependent Spatial Learning

Here, we present a protocol for the active place avoidance test, a hippocampus-dependent spatial learning paradigm designed for rodents. Altering key parameters allows for re-testing of animals before and after treatments or over time.

The Active Place Avoidance (APA) Test, an Effective, Versatile and Repeatable Spatial Learning Task for Mice

Hippocampus-dependent spatial learning in rodents has been tested using a variety of methods. These include the Morris water maze (MWM), Y-maze, and novel ...

the-active-place-avoidance-apa-test-an-effective-versatile-repeatable

Universidad de Cartagena UDEC

Research

JoVE Journal

Behavior

2.0K Views.  The University of Queensland. Here, we present a protocol for the active place avoidance test, a hippocampus-dependent spatial learning paradigm designed for rodents. Altering key parameters allows for re-testing of animals before and after treatments or over time.

Video: Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Aging on Hippocampal-Dependent Spatial Learning

The Double-H Maze: A Robust Behavioral Test for Learning and Memory in Rodents

Spatial cognition research in rodents typically employs the use of maze tasks, whose attributes vary from one maze to the next. These tasks vary by their behavioral flexibility and required memory duration, the number of goals and pathways, and also the overall task complexity. A confounding feature in many of these tasks is the lack of control over the strategy employed by the rodents to reach the goal, e.g., allocentric (declarative-like) or egocentric (procedural) based strategies. The double-H maze is a novel water-escape memory task that addresses this issue, by allowing the experimenter to direct the type of strategy learned during the training period. The double-H maze is a transparent device, which consists of a central alleyway with three arms protruding on both sides, along with an escape platform submerged at the extremity of one of these arms.
Rats can be trained using an allocentric strategy by alternating the start position in the maze in an unpredictable manner (see protocol 1; &#167;4.7), thus requiring them to learn the location of the platform based on the available allothetic cues. Alternatively, an egocentric learning strategy (protocol 2; &#167;4.8) can be employed by releasing the rats from the same position during each trial, until they learn the procedural pattern required to reach the goal. This task has been proven to allow for the formation of stable memory traces.
Memory can be probed following the training period in a misleading probe trial, in which the starting position for the rats alternates. Following an egocentric learning paradigm, rats typically resort to an allocentric-based strategy, but only when their initial view on the extra-maze cues differs markedly from their original position. This task is ideally suited to explore the effects of drugs/perturbations on allocentric/egocentric memory performance, as well as the interactions between these two memory systems.

The goal of this protocol is to investigate spatial cognition in rodents. The double-H water maze is a novel test, which is particularly useful to elucidate the different components of learning, consolidation and memory, as well as the interplay of memory systems.

Spatial cognition research in rodents typically employs the use of maze tasks, whose attributes vary from one maze to the next. These tasks vary by their ...

Novel Object Recognition Test for the Investigation of Learning and Memory in Mice

The object recognition test (ORT) is a commonly used behavioral assay for the investigation of various aspects of learning and memory in mice. The ORT is fairly simple and can be completed over 3 days: habituation day, training day, and testing day. During training, the mouse is allowed to explore 2 identical objects. On test day, one of the training objects is replaced with a novel object. Because mice have an innate preference for novelty, if the mouse recognizes the familiar object, it will spend most of its time at the novel object. Due to this innate preference, there is no need for positive or negative reinforcement or long training schedules. Additionally, the ORT can also be modified for numerous applications. The retention interval can be shortened to examine short-term memory, or lengthened to probe long-term memory. Pharmacological intervention can be used at various times prior to training, after training, or prior to recall to investigate different phases of learning (i.e., acquisition, early or late consolidation, or recall). Overall, the ORT is a relatively low-stress, efficient test for memory in mice, and is appropriate for the detection of neuropsychological changes following pharmacological, biological, or genetic manipulations.

The object recognition test (ORT) is a simple and efficient assay for evaluating learning and memory in mice. The methodology is described below.

The object recognition test (ORT) is a commonly used behavioral assay for the investigation of various aspects of learning and memory in mice. The ORT is ...

Assessing Spatial Memory Impairment in a Mouse Model of Traumatic Brain Injury Using a Radial Water Tread Maze

Despite the recent increase in use of mouse models in scientific research, researchers continue to use cognitive tasks that were originally designed and validated for rat use. The Radial Water Tread (RWT) maze test of spatial memory (designed specifically for mice and requiring no swimming) has been shown previously to successfully distinguish between controlled cortical impact-induced TBI mice and sham controls. Here, a detailed protocol for this task is presented. The RWT maze capitalizes on the natural tendency of mice to avoid open areas in favor of hugging the sides of an apparatus (thigmotaxis). The walls of the maze are lined with nine escape holes placed above the floor of the apparatus, and mice are trained to use visual cues to locate the escape hole that leads out of the maze. The maze is filled with an inch of cold water, sufficient to motivate escape but not deep enough to require that the mouse swim. The acquisition period takes only four training days, with a test of memory retention on day five and a long-term memory test on day 12. The results reported here suggest that the RWT maze is a feasible alternative to rat-validated, swimming-based cognitive tests in the assessment of spatial memory deficits in mouse models of TBI.

Here we present a protocol for a mouse-specific test of cognition that does not require swimming. This test can be used to successfully distinguish controlled cortical impact-induced traumatic brain injury mice from sham controls.

Despite the recent increase in use of mouse models in scientific research, researchers continue to use cognitive tasks that were originally designed and ...

A Behavioral Assay for Investigating the Role of Spatial Memory During Instinctive Defense in Mice

Evolution has selected a repertoire of defensive behaviors that are essential for survival across all animal species. These behaviors are often stereotyped actions elicited in response to innately aversive sensory stimuli, but their success requires enough flexibility for adapting to different spatial environments, which can change rapidly. Here, we describe a behavioral assay to evaluate the influence of learned spatial knowledge on defensive behaviors in mice. We have adapted the widely used Barnes maze spatial memory assay to investigate how mice navigate to a shelter during escape responses to innately aversive sensory stimuli in a novel environment, and how they adapt to acute changes in the environment. This new assay is an ethological paradigm that does not require training and exploits the natural exploration patterns and navigation strategies in mice. We propose that the set of protocols described here are a powerful means of studying goal-directed behaviors and stimulus-triggered navigation, which should be of interest to both the fields of instinctive behaviors and spatial memory.

This protocol describes a behavioral assay, based on the Barnes maze test, to study how instinctive defensive actions are modified by the knowledge of spatial environment.

Evolution has selected a repertoire of defensive behaviors that are essential for survival across all animal species. These behaviors are often ...

Analyzing Spatial Learning and Prosocial Behavior in Mice Using the Barnes Maze and Damsel-in-Distress Paradigms

The Barnes maze is a reliable measure of spatial learning and memory that does not require food restriction or exposure to extremely stressful stimuli. The Barnes maze can also assess other mouse behaviors, such as general motivation to escape from the maze platform and exploratory behavior. The Barnes maze can measure whether a genetic mutation or environmental variable can impact the acquisition and retention of spatial memories, as well as provide information about the search strategy employed by the mice. Here we use the Barnes maze to detect a memory deficit in adult mice following a single developmental ethanol exposure event. The newly described Damsel-in-Distress paradigm exposes a male mouse to a female mouse trapped in a chamber in the open center field of the arena. It provides an opportunity for the mouse to socially respond to the trapped female and exhibit prosocial behavior. The Damsel-in-Distress paradigm can also be used to examine mouse behavior in a novel arena and measure locomotor activity. Both the Barnes Maze and the Damsel-in-Distress protocols require minimal financial investment and most aspects of the tests can be constructed from common lab supplies. These flexible and accessible tools can also be used to detect behavioral changes over the course of development.

This protocol measures spatial learning and memory using the Barnes maze. A novel Damsel-in-Distress paradigm is used to assess locomotor activity and prosocial behavior in mice.

The Barnes maze is a reliable measure of spatial learning and memory that does not require food restriction or exposure to extremely stressful stimuli. ...

Automated, Long-term Behavioral Assay for Cognitive Functions in Multiple Genetic Models of Alzheimer's Disease, Using IntelliCage

Multiple factors&#8212;such as aging and genes&#8212;are frequently associated with cognitive decline. Genetically modified mouse models of cognitive decline, such as Alzheimer&#39;s disease (AD), have become a promising tool to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and promote the therapeutic advances. An important step is the validation and characterization of expected behavioral abnormality in the models, in the case of AD, cognitive decline. The long-term behavioral investigations of laboratory animals to study the effect of aging demand substantial efforts from researchers. The IntelliCage system is a high-throughput and cost-effective test battery for mice that eliminates the need for daily human handling. Here, we describe how the system is utilized in the long-term phenotyping of a genetic Alzheimer&#39;s disease model, specifically focusing on the cognitive functions. The experiment employs repeated battery of tests that assess spatial learning and executive functions. This cost-effective age-dependent phenotyping allows us to identify the transient and/or permanent effects of genes on various cognitive aspects.

This paper describes a protocol for cognitive assessments for genetic models of the Alzheimer&#39;s disease using the IntelliCage system, which is a high throughput automated behavioral monitoring system with operant conditioning.

Multiple factors&#8212;such as aging and genes&#8212;are frequently associated with cognitive decline. Genetically modified mouse models of cognitive ...

Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget

Ethologically relevant behavioral testing is a critical component of any study that uses mouse models to study the cognitive effects of various physiological or pathological changes. The object location task (OLT) and the novel object recognition task (NORT) are two effective behavioral tasks commonly used to reveal the function and relative health of specific brain regions involved in memory. While both of these tests exploit the inherent preference of mice for the novelty to reveal memory for previously encountered objects, the OLT primarily evaluates spatial learning, which relies heavily on hippocampal activity. The NORT, in contrast, evaluates non-spatial learning of object identity, which relies on multiple brain regions. Both tasks require an open-field-testing arena, objects with equivalent intrinsic value to mice, appropriate environmental cues, and video recording equipment and the software. Commercially available systems, while convenient, can be costly. This manuscript details a simple, cost-effective method for building the arenas and setting up the equipment necessary to perform the OLT and NORT. Furthermore, the manuscript describes an efficient testing protocol that incorporates both OLT and NORT and provides typical methods for data acquisition and analysis, as well as representative results. Successful completion of these tests can provide valuable insight into the memory function of various mouse model systems and appraise the underlying neural regions that support these functions.

Here we provide a protocol which includes comprehensive instructions for the economical establishment of murine object location and novel object recognition behavioral testing, including the design, cost, and construction of required equipment as well as execution of behavioral testing, data collection, and analysis.

Ethologically relevant behavioral testing is a critical component of any study that uses mouse models to study the cognitive effects of various ...

An Open-Source Virtual Reality System for the Measurement of Spatial Learning in Head-Restrained Mice

Head-restrained behavioral experiments in mice allow neuroscientists to observe neural circuit activity with high-resolution electrophysiological and optical imaging tools while delivering precise sensory stimuli to a behaving animal. Recently, human and rodent studies using virtual reality (VR) environments have shown VR to be an important tool for uncovering the neural mechanisms underlying spatial learning in the hippocampus and cortex, due to the extremely precise control over parameters such as spatial and contextual cues. Setting up virtual environments for rodent spatial behaviors can, however, be costly and require an extensive background in engineering and computer programming. Here, we present a simple yet powerful system based upon inexpensive, modular, open-source hardware and software that enables researchers to study spatial learning in head-restrained mice using a VR environment. This system uses coupled microcontrollers to measure locomotion and deliver behavioral stimuli while head-restrained mice run on a wheel in concert with a virtual linear track environment rendered by a graphical software package running on a single-board computer. The emphasis on distributed processing allows researchers to design flexible, modular systems to elicit and measure complex spatial behaviors in mice in order to determine the connection between neural circuit activity and spatial learning in the mammalian brain.

Here, we present a simplified open-source hardware and software setup for investigating mouse spatial learning using virtual reality (VR). This system displays a virtual linear track to a head-restrained mouse running on a wheel by utilizing a network of microcontrollers and a single-board computer running an easy-to-use Python graphical software package.

Head-restrained behavioral experiments in mice allow neuroscientists to observe neural circuit activity with high-resolution electrophysiological and ...

Neuroscience

Barnes Maze: A Method For Assessing Spacial Learning and Memory in Lab Animals

Source: Ingersoll, J. et al. <a href="https://jove.unicartagenaproxy.elogim.com/video/58008/analyzing-spatial-learning-prosocial-behavior-mice-using-barnes-maze">Analyzing Spatial Learning and Prosocial Behavior in Mice Using the Barnes Maze and Damsel-in-Distress Paradigms</a>. J. Vis. Exp. (2018).
This video shows how to use the Barnes Maze with a mouse. The Barnes Maze testing procedure is used by researchers to assess spatial learning and memory in laboratory animals following repeated trials.

Labirynt Barnesa: metoda oceny uczenia się przestrzennego i pamięci u zwierząt laboratoryjnych

Source: Ingersoll, J. et al. Analyzing Spatial Learning and Prosocial Behavior in Mice Using the Barnes Maze and Damsel-in-Distress Paradigms. J. Vis. ...