Iowa State University is part of a team supporting DARPA&#39;s Insect Allies program HR0011-17-2-0053. This work was also supported by the Iowa State University Plant Sciences Institute, Iowa State University Crop Bioengineering Center, USDA NIFA Hatch project number 3808, and State of Iowa Funds. K.L.H. was also partially supported by the Iowa State University Predictive Plant Phenomics graduate training program funded by the National Science Foundation (DGE #1545453) and by Agricultural and Food Research Initiative grant no. 2019-07318 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. The funders had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funders.
We thank Nick Lauter (USDA-ARS, Ames, IA) for seed of maize inbred lines, Christian F. Montes-Serey (Iowa State University) for making the FoMV-GFP clone, and Tyler Austin (Iowa State University) for technical assistance.

1. Plasmid construction
NOTE: This protocol can be applied to other viral vectors or Agrobacterium strains, but this may affect the overall success of inoculation by agroinjection. Always perform bacterial inoculation and plating steps in a laminar flow hood.
<ol>
	<li>FoMV silencing construct 
	NOTE: Luria-Bertani (LB) media (Miller) is used for all media unless otherwise specified. Liquid LB is made by suspending 25 g of granules into 1,000 mL of distilled water and autoclaving for 15 min at 121 &#176;C. Solid LB media is similarly made with the addition of 1.5% agar before autoclaving. Antibiotics&#160;are added after LB is cooled to ~60 &#176;C, and the solution is poured into 95 x 15 mm Petri plates. The antibiotic concentrations to use are as follows: rifampicin (rif) at 25 &#181;g/mL, gentamycin (gent) at 50 &#181;g/mL, and kanamycin (kan) at 50 &#181;g/mL.
	<ol>
		<li>PCR amplify fragments from the maize gene to be silenced (e.g., les22 or pds) using a forward primer with a PacI restriction site and a reverse primer with an XbaI restriction site. This will enable ligation of the gene fragments into the MCS1* of the FoMV-pCAMBIA1380 binary vector in the antisense orientation. 
		NOTE: Set up the PCR using a high-fidelity DNA polymerase, forward and reverse primers at 10 &#181;M each, plasmid DNA template, and water, following the DNA polymerase specifications. Amplify for 35 cycles, using an annealing temperature according to the DNA polymerase and primer melting temperature (Tm), and a 30 s extension per kilobase to be amplified.</li>
		<li>Perform PCR purification using a PCR purification kit according to the kit specifications.</li>
		<li>Digest the purified PCR product and the FoMV-EV with the restriction enzymes XbaI and PacI. Use 1 &#181;g of plasmid or all of the purified PCR product, 2 &#181;L of 10x buffer, 1 &#181;L of restriction enzyme, and add water to make a 20 &#181;L final reaction volume. Incubate according to enzyme specification.</li>
		<li>Ligate the digested PCR product and FoMV-EV together with T4 DNA ligase according to the manufacturer&#39;s protocol.</li>
		<li>Transform the ligated plasmid into DH5&#945; chemically competent E. coli cells using the heat shock method.
		<ol>
			<li>Thaw cells on ice and add 3 &#181;L of plasmid to the tube. Incubate on ice for 30 min, then heat shock for 30 s at 42 &#176;C.</li>
			<li>Place on ice for 5 min, add 200 &#181;L super optimal broth with catabolic repression (SOC) and allow E. coli cells to recover in SOC media for 1 h at 37 &#176;C with shaking at 225 rpm.</li>
			<li>Plate on kanamycin&#160;selective LB media and incubate at 37 &#176;C overnight.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Check colonies for accurate clones by Sanger sequencing using the primers FM-5840F and FM-6138R (Supplemental Table 1). Submit 250 ng of plasmid DNA to a facility that will perform Sanger sequencing. For this experiment samples were sent to Iowa State University DNA Core Facility.</li>
		<li>Inoculate 2 mL of liquid LB with the chosen colony and incubate at 37 &#176;C overnight with shaking at 225 rpm. Extract plasmid DNA from the overnight culture through an alkaline lysis plasmid DNA preparation52.</li>
		<li>Transform plasmid DNA into Agrobacterium strain GV3101 cells using the freeze-thaw method. Allow 100 &#181;L of chemically competent cells to thaw on ice, add 1-5 &#181;L of plasmid and incubate on ice for 30 min. Place in liquid nitrogen for 1 min, then incubate at 37 &#176;C for 3 min. Add 1 mL of SOC, allow to recover for 2-3 h at 28 &#176;C with shaking, plate on rif, gent, and kan selective LB media and incubate at 28 &#176;C for 2 days.</li>
		<li>Screen colonies for the presence of insert with colony PCR. Pick a single bacterial colony and mix it in 30 &#181;L of water. Set up a PCR reaction by adding 12.5 &#181;L of polymerase&#160;master mix, 1.25 &#181;L of each 10 &#181;M primer, FM-5840F and FM-6138R, 3 &#181;L of the bacterial colony suspension, and water to a final volume of 25 &#181;L. Cycle 35 times with an annealing temperature of 64 &#176;C and an extension time of 1 min (1 min for every kb amplified).</li>
		<li>Inoculate 2-5 mL of liquid LB (rif, gent, kan) with the correct Agrobacterium colony. Let it grow overnight at 28 &#176;C with shaking at 225 rpm.</li>
		<li>Mix the overnight culture with a 50% glycerol solution 1:1. Store at -80 &#176;C for long-term storage.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>FoMV expression construct
	<ol>
		<li>PCR amplify the coding sequence of interest including start and stop codons (e.g., GFP) as described in 1.1.1, adding a Bsu36I restriction site on the forward primer and a PspOMI restriction site on the reverse primer to enable directional cloning in the sense orientation into MCS2.</li>
		<li>Perform PCR purification using a PCR purification kit according to the kit&#39;s specifications.</li>
		<li>Digest the PCR product and the FoMV-EV with the restriction enzymes Bsu36I and PspOMI, as described in 1.1.3.</li>
		<li>Ligate the digested PCR product and FoMV-EV together with T4 DNA ligase according to the manufacturer&#39;s protocol.</li>
		<li>Transform into DH5&#945; chemically competent E. coli cells using the heat shock method as described in 1.1.5. Plate on kanamycin&#160;selective LB media and incubate at 37 &#176;C overnight.</li>
		<li>Check colonies for accurate clones by Sanger sequencing as described in 1.1.6 using the primers 5AmuS2 and 5AmuA2 (Supplemental Table 1).</li>
		<li>Inoculate 2 mL of liquid LB with the chosen colony and incubate at 37 &#176;C overnight with shaking at 225 RPM. Extract plasmid DNA from the overnight culture through an alkaline lysis plasmid DNA preparation52.</li>
		<li>Transform plasmid DNA into Agrobacterium strain GV3101 chemically competent cells using the freeze-thaw method as described in 1.1.8. Plate on rif, gent, and kan selective LB media and incubate at 28 &#176;C for 2 days.</li>
		<li>Screen colonies for the presence of insert with colony PCR using the primers 5AmuS2 and 5AmuA2.</li>
		<li>Inoculate 2-5 mL liquid LB (rif, gent, kan) with the correct Agrobacterium colony. Shake overnight at 225 rpm at 28 &#176;C.</li>
		<li>Mix the overnight culture with a 50% glycerol solution 1:1. Store at -80 &#176;C for long-term storage.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>SCMV expression construct
	<ol>
		<li>PCR amplify the gene of interest (e.g., GFP) excluding the stop codon as described in 1.1.1, including a PspOMI digestion site on the forward primer and a SbfI digestion site on the reverse primer to enable directional cloning into the SCMV-pCAMBIA1380 binary vector. 
		NOTE: Insert must be cloned in frame with the viral polyprotein.</li>
		<li>Perform PCR purification using a PCR purification kit according to the kit&#39;s specifications.</li>
		<li>Digest the PCR product and the SCMV-EV with the restriction enzymes PspOMI and SbfI, as described in 1.1.3.</li>
		<li>Ligate the digested PCR product and SCMV-EV together with T4 DNA ligase according to the manufacturer&#39;s protocol.</li>
		<li>Transform the product into DH5&#945; chemically competent E. coli cells using the heat shock method as described in 1.1.5. Plate on kan&#160;selective LB media and incubate at 37 &#176;C overnight.</li>
		<li>Screen colonies for accurate clones by Sanger sequencing as described in 1.1.6 using the primers SC-745F and HCProR1 (Supplemental Table 1).</li>
		<li>Inoculate 2 mL of liquid LB with the chosen colony and incubate at 37 &#176;C overnight with shaking at 225 rpm. Extract the plasmid DNA from the overnight culture through an alkaline lysis plasmid DNA preparation52.</li>
		<li>Transform the plasmid DNA into Agrobacterium strain GV3101 chemically competent cells using the freeze-thaw method as described in 1.1.8. Plate on rif, gent, and kan selective LB media and incubate at 28 &#176;C for 2 days.</li>
		<li>Screen colonies for presence of insert with colony PCR with the primers SC-745F and HCProR1 as described in 1.1.9.</li>
		<li>Inoculate 2-5 mL of liquid LB (rif, gent, kan) with the correct Agrobacterium colony. Shake overnight at 225 rpm at 28 &#176;C.</li>
		<li>Mix the overnight culture with a 50% glycerol solution 1:1. Store at -80 &#176;C for long-term storage.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
2. Seedling preparation
<ol>
	<li>Plant 1-2 maize seeds (&#39;Golden Bantam&#39; sweet corn, FR1064, B73, etc.) in peat-based growing medium in small inserts placed inside trays 4-7 days before injection. Place in a growth chamber under 16 h days at 25 &#176;C and 8 h nights at 22 &#176;C (~185 photosynthetically active radiation (PAR)) or in a greenhouse under 16 h days at 22-25 &#176;C and 8 h nights at 22-25 &#176;C (350-400 PAR). 
	NOTE: Susceptibility to Agrobacterium varies among maize genotypes, affecting the rates of success. Additionally, some viral vectors may be incompatible with certain maize genotypes.</li>
	<li>Water regularly and fertilize once a week with 15-5-15 liquid fertilizer at 330 parts per million (PPM).</li>
</ol>
3. Preparation of Agrobacterium
<ol>
	<li>One day before the injection, prepare LB liquid media with the appropriate antibiotic (rif, gent, kan) and inoculate with the Agrobacterium strain carrying the desired viral construct. It is recommended to add 20 &#181;L of glycerol stock into 50 mL of LB, which should yield enough bacterial culture to inoculate &#62;100 plants and can be scaled up or down as needed. 
	NOTE: Prepare enough inoculum to have a final amount of bacterial suspension of at least 1 mL at an optical density of 600 nm (OD600) of 1.0 for every 4-5 plants.</li>
	<li>Shake at 225 rpm at 28 &#176;C for 24 h.</li>
	<li>Pellet bacteria for 10 min at 4,000 x g at room temperature. Discard the supernatant.</li>
	<li>Wash the pellet thoroughly with 1 mL of deionized (DI) water by pipetting or gentle vortexing.</li>
	<li>Repeat step 3.3 to pellet bacteria.</li>
	<li>Resuspend the pellet in 1 mL of 10 mM MgSO4 solution by pipetting or gentle vortexing.
	<ol>
		<li>Optionally, add 200 &#181;M acetosyringone to the solution. Although commonly used, acetosyringone only enhances the transformation ability of some Agrobacterium strains. The authors have not found that the addition of acetosyringone affects efficiency in this protocol (Supplemental Table 2). 
		NOTE: 10 mM MgSO4 solution can be made from a 1 M stock solution with a pH of 6.3 stored at room temperature. Solution will likely not require pH adjustment.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Measure OD600 of the sample with a spectrophotometer and dilute to 1.0 OD600 with 10 mM MgSO4 solution. 
	&#8203;NOTE: This is a safe stopping point. Bacterial suspension can be kept at room temperature for up to 5 h before injection.</li>
</ol>
4. Injection
NOTE: Maize seedlings from 4-7 days old can be used for injection. Seedling growth rate is greatly affected by growth conditions, amount of PAR (i.e., higher PAR in greenhouse than in growth chamber), and genotype, among other things that can be difficult to control in greenhouse conditions. Plants can be injected as young as 4 days old when they are 2-3 cm tall with no leaves expanded and as old as 7 days when the lowermost rounded-tip leaf is expanded. The success rate of this inoculation methods drops rapidly as plants age beyond 7 days after sowing. The injection site is the same no matter the age of the seedlings.
<ol>
	<li>Wearing safety goggles, inject the bacterial suspension into the seedlings 2-3 mm above the coleoptilar node using a 25G x 5/8&#34; needle attached to a 1 mL disposable syringe. 
	NOTE: The coleoptilar node is where crown roots will eventually form. This is the lowest node on the plant. Typically, there will be a color change from green to white at and below the node. The injection location is just above the meristem. Dissecting a few seedlings at this stage may help with visualizing the location of the meristem and consequently the proper injection site.</li>
	<li>Apply gentle pressure to the syringe until the suspension fills up the coleoptile or is visible in the whorl, depending on the growth stage of the plants. This is approximately 100-200 &#181;L of suspension. 
	NOTE: If it is difficult to inject the suspension into the seedling, the injection site may be too low. Moderate pressure is all that should be needed to inject the suspension.</li>
	<li>Inject all seedlings, changing syringes and needles for each construct.</li>
</ol>
5. Continued plant care
<ol>
	<li>Transplant the injected seedlings to 13 x 13 x 15 cm or larger pots when they are 7-8 days old.</li>
	<li>Maintain growth conditions (16 h photoperiod and fertilizing once per week).</li>
</ol>
6. Confirmation of infection (Phenotypically and RT-PCR)
<ol>
	<li>Phenotypically score plants between 14-21 DPI. Lesions from silencing the control genes lesion mimic 22 or phytoene desaturase can easily be seen on the leaves and are distinct from FoMV symptoms. GFP expression can be detected via fluorescent microscope imaging or other UV light imaging. 
	NOTE: Some constructs/viral vectors may take longer to show symptoms or may not show any symptoms at all. High light conditions greatly increase the phenotypes caused by silencing lesion mimic 22 and phytoene desaturase. Lesions may be less visible or absent if plants are maintained in lower light conditions such as a growth chamber, however the actual infection rate as determined by RT-PCR should not be affected (Table 1).</li>
	<li>To confirm infection molecularly, sample leaf 6 between 14-21 DPI and extract total RNA using a phenol-chloroform extraction according to manufacturer&#39;s instruction.</li>
	<li>Using the extracted RNA as a template to generate first-strand cDNA.
	<ol>
		<li>Set up the cDNA reaction with up to 5 &#181;g of total RNA, 1 &#181;L of random hexamer primers, 1 &#181;L of oligo (dT)18 primers, 1 &#181;L of dNTPs, 1 &#181;L of of reverse transcriptase and water for a final volume of 14.5 &#181;L.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Using primers designed for the viral construct and the cDNA as a template, perform PCR on each sample to confirm viral infection and determine the integrity of the gene or gene fragment of interest as described in 1.1.1, except reduce cycles to 25 for FoMV and 30 for SCMV to avoid false positives.
	<ol>
		<li>For FoMV silencing constructs, use primers FM-5840F and FM-6138R to amplify across the MCS1*, which contains the maize gene fragment. For FoMV expression constructs, use primers 5AmuS2 and 5AmuA2 to amplify across the MCS2, which contains the inserted gene.</li>
		<li>For SCMV expression constructs, use primers SC745-F and HCProR1 to amplify across the MCS, which contains the inserted gene (Supplementary Figure 3).</li>
		<li>For an endogenous control gene, use primers ZmActS and ZmActA, which amplify an mRNA fragment of maize actin (GRMZM2G126010) or primers ZmUbiF and ZmUbiR, which amplify an mRNA fragment of maize polyubiquitin (GRMZM2G409726_T01).</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Visualize the PCR product on a 1% agarose gel containing a nucleic acid stain to determine the presence or absence of virus and gene or gene fragment.</li>
</ol>

The researchers have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Agrobacterium is an essential tool that facilitates numerous molecular biology techniques in plant-related research. This study provides an agroinjection protocol for inoculating FoMV and SCMV viral vectors directly into maize tissues for VIGS and VOX applications. The main goal is to increase the ease and utility of virus-based technologies for research in monocot crop plants. Although direct agroinoculation of maize has been reported for a few viruses, the authors are not aware of a detailed protocol, and there are no examples of VIGS and VOX applications in those studies19,22.
It has been reported, and was confirmed while developing this protocol, that the injection location is a key factor for successfully launching a systemic viral infection via agroinjection19. Consistently injecting the recommended location on the plant is assumed to be the largest variable, because the exact position of the meristem in maize seedlings is virtually undetectable by eye. To minimize interpersonal variation, dissecting a few maize seedlings down to the meristem is recommended to better visualize its location (Figure 3C). The meristem&#39;s position in relation to the coleoptilar node should be roughly the same for plants aged 4-7 days old. Additionally, practicing injection with a dyed liquid provides an easily visible demonstration of how the &#34;inoculum&#34; fills the leaf whorl, and because the injection site is marked with dye, the accuracy of the injection site can be corroborated (Figure 3G,H). Meristematic tissues are the most susceptible to agroinjection, but injecting Agrobacterium suspensions directly into this tissue results in undesirable morphological effects (Figure 6)19. Plants with damaged meristems survive, but the resulting defects are undesirable, and thus, direct injection of this tissue should be avoided.
There are several variables that may impact the successful launch of a systemic viral infection via agroinjection because three complex biological systems (plant, virus, and Agrobacterium strain) must interact in coordination. This complex interplay may be aided by the rapidly-dividing cells of the meristematic region, making it an ideal location for agroinoculation19. The Agrobacterium strain&#160;must be able to infect cells of the plant tissues to deliver the T-DNA carrying the viral genome, and the plant must be susceptible to the virus in order to initiate viral replication and systemic infection. Maize genotypes differ in their susceptibility to viruses (e.g., Mo17 is resistant to FoMV) or Agrobacterium strains, but the majority that were tested appear to be susceptible to both FoMV and SCMV (Table 1 and Table 2)53. For example, the inbred line FR1064 and the sweet corn variety Golden Bantam may be particularly susceptible to both GV3101 Agrobacterium and FoMV-based vectors.
The leaf number sampled and the timing of sampling for RT-PCR is critical for accurate assessment of viral infection. In the examples shown here, leaf number was determined by starting at the first rounded leaf (commonly known as the &#34;thumb leaf&#34;) and counting upward. Leaves were sampled once they were expanded and the next leaf had begun emerging. However, which leaves are optimal for sampling might vary based on virus species used, growth conditions, and maize genotype. Therefore, an initial time course experiment is recommended when applying this protocol to a new virus system to optimize the sampling strategy with respect to leaves and timing.
The specific construct used significantly affects the efficiency of this protocol. For example, the empty vectors, FoMV-EV and SCMV-EV, and FoMV-PDS&#160;and FoMV-LES22,which both contain small inserts (313 bp and 329 bp, respectively), typically produce the highest percentages of plants with viral symptoms in these experiments (Tables 1 and Table 2). However, recombinant viruses carrying larger inserts of the GFP ORF (720 bp) in FoMV-GFP and SCMV-GFP, had much lower infection rates when compared to plants injected with the empty vector or gene silencing constructs. This trend may be due to the negative impacts on viral fitness caused by increasing amounts of exogenous genetic material in the viral genome. Several studies have shown that the insert stability of plant viral vectors is largely dependent on insert size and sequence36,54,55,56,57. Additionally, there was a notable difference in percentage of plants that become infected following inoculation with either the FoMV or SCMV empty vector, suggesting additional work is needed to optimize this protocol for SCMV (Table 1). These results indicate that some troubleshooting may be needed when developing a construct, because the sequence and length of the fragment can both affect efficiency.
Overall, this study has shown that agroinjection of maize seedlings is an effective inoculation method for two different RNA plant viruses, multiple vector configurations, and 11 genotypes of maize. This work with FoMV and SCMV, paired with previous works utilizing injection with maize chlorotic mottle virus (MCMV) or MSV, indicates that agroinjection is suitable for inoculating maize seedlings with infectious clones of both RNA and DNA viruses19,20,21,22. Additionally, this work further shows agroinjection is a viable method for VIGS and VOX vectors and can be applied to plants as young as four days old (Table 3). The protocol presented here is expected to be readily adapted by maize biologists to facilitate research in functional genomics studies involving transient gene silencing (VIGS) and overexpression (VOX). Agroinjection also has the capacity to facilitate virus-based gene editing approaches (VEdGE) that would otherwise be limited by reliance on plant transformation, potentially improving editing efficiency as well as accessibility58,59,60. Given the appropriate Agrobacterium strain, maize genotypes, and viral vectors are thoughtfully combined, inoculation by agroinjection is expected to become a valuable tool for transient gene function analyses in maize.

Infectious clones of many plant viruses have been engineered for virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS), gene overexpression (VOX), and most recently, virus-enabled gene editing (VEdGE)1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11. As new viral constructs are developed, methods to successfully infect plant tissues with these modified viruses must also be considered. Current methods to launch virus infections in plants include particle bombardment, rub-inoculation of in vitro RNA transcripts or DNA clones, vascular puncture inoculation, or Agrobacterium tumefaciens inoculation (agroinoculation)5,12,13,14,15,16,17. Each of these inoculation methods has inherent advantages and disadvantages, which include cost, need for specialized equipment, and feasibility within a given plant-virus system. Methods that utilize infiltration or injection of Agrobacterium strains containing binary T-DNA constructs designed to deliver recombinant viruses are preferred, because they are simple and inexpensive. However, detailed agroinoculation methods for monocotyledonous species such as Zea mays (maize) are lacking.
One of the first reports of agroinoculation for virus delivery was published in 1986, when the genome of cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) was inserted into a T-DNA construct, and the resulting Agrobacterium carrying this construct was rub-inoculated onto turnip plants18. Additional methods for agroinoculation have since been developed. For example, in the case of foxtail mosaic virus (FoMV), Nicotiana benthamiana can be used as an intermediate host to generate virus particles in leaves that provide an inoculum source6. Rub inoculation of maize using infected N. benthamiana leaves is efficient, rapid, and simple, but the use of an intermediate host does not work for all maize-infecting viruses. Sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV), for example, cannot infect N. benthamiana,&#160;requiring the use of alternative inoculum sources for vectors derived from this virus. In 1988, Agrobacterium containing maize streak virus (MSV), a DNA virus, was introduced into maize seedlings by injection (agroinjection), demonstrating Agrobacterium-based inoculation methods are also useful for monocots19. Despite this early success with agroinjection, few studies utilizing this technique in maize have been published, leaving open questions about the applicability of this method for RNA viruses and VIGS, VOX, and VEdGE vectors20,21,22. However, broad use of agroinjection in monocot species is promising, because this general approach has been utilized in orchid, rice, and wheat23,24,25,26,27,28.
This protocol was optimized for FoMV and Agrobacterium strain GV3101 and has also been applied to an SCMV vector. FoMV is a potexvirus with a wide host range that includes 56 monocot and dicot species29. FoMV has a 6.2 kilobase (kb) positive sense, single-stranded RNA genome that encodes five different proteins from five open reading frames (ORFs)30,31,32,33,34,35. FoMV was previously developed into both a VIGS and VOX vector for maize by incorporating an infectious clone onto a T-DNA plasmid backbone6,36,37. The viral genome was modified for VIGS applications by adding a cloning site (MCS1*) immediately downstream of the coat protein (CP) (Figure 1A)36. For VOX and VEdGE applications, the CP promoter was duplicated and a second cloning site (MCS2) was added to enable insertion of sequences of interest between ORF 4 and the CP (Figure 1B)6. The FoMV vector containing both MCS1 and MCS2 with no inserts is FoMV empty vector (FoMV-EV) (Figure 1).
SCMV is an unrelated virus that has been developed for VOX in maize38. It is a member of the Potyviridae family, of which several members have been engineered to express foreign proteins in planta39,40,41,42,43,44. The host range of SCMV includes maize, sorghum, and sugarcane45,46, making it valuable for gene functional studies in these major crop plants36,38. SCMV has a positive sense, single-stranded RNA genome of approximately 10 kb in length47,48. To create the SCMV VOX vector, the well-established P1/HCPro junction was utilized as an insertion site for heterologous sequences38. This cloning site is followed by sequence encoding a NIa-Pro protease cleavage site, leading to the production of proteins independent from the SCMV polyprotein (Figure 1C).
T-DNA plasmids carrying infectious cDNA of these recombinant viruses have been transformed into Agrobacterium strain GV3101. GV3101 is a nopaline type strain, which are well-known to be able to transfer T-DNA to monocotyledonous species, including maize26,28,49. Additionally, previous agroinjection studies have used the strains C58 or its derivative GV3101, as well19,20,22,27.
Three marker genes were used in the development of this protocol: two for gene silencing and one for gene expression. A 329 base-pair (bp) fragment from the maize gene lesion mimic 22 (les22, GRMZM2G044074) was used to construct the silencing vector FoMV-LES22. When les22 is silenced in maize, small, round patches of necrotic cells appear along the vasculature of leaves that expand and coalesce into large areas of necrotic leaf tissue50. FoMV-PDS, containing a 313 bp fragment from the sorghum gene phytoene desaturase (pds, LOC110436156, 96% sequence identity to maize pds, GRMZM2G410515), induces silencing of pds in maize, resulting in small streaks of photobleached cells along the vasculature of the leaves that lengthen over time51. The intact coding sequence for green fluorescent protein (GFP) was used to demonstrate protein expression for both FoMV (FoMV-GFP) and SCMV (SCMV-GFP). GFP expression in the leaves is typically most detectable at 14 days post inoculation (DPI)6. Although there have been previous studies utilizing agroinjection of viral vectors in maize, these experiments have only shown that agroinjection can facilitate viral infection from an infectious clone in maize seedlings and do not expand to recombinant viruses designed for VIGS or VOX applications19,20,21,22. The protocol presented here builds upon previous agroinjection methods, particularly Grismley et al.19. Overall, this agroinjection method is compatible with VIGS and VOX vectors, does not require specialized equipment or alternative hosts as inoculum sources, and decreases the overall time and cost required to set up and perform inoculations relative to other common methods that require biolistics or in vitro transcription. This protocol will facilitate functional genomics studies in maize with applications involving VIGS, VOX, and VEdGE.

<table><tbody><tr><td>1 mL syringes</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>14955450</td><td>alternatively, BD 309659</td></tr><tr><td>15 mL Falcon Tubes</td><td>Corning Science</td><td>352059</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1kb+ Ladder</td><td>ThermoFisher Scientific</td><td>10787018</td><td>For assessing sizes of PCR products</td></tr><tr><td>25G x 5/8&quot; PrecisionGlide Needles</td><td>Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD)</td><td>305122</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>28&amp;deg;C Incubator</td><td></td><td></td><td>For Agrobacterium</td></tr><tr><td>37&amp;deg;C Incubator</td><td></td><td></td><td>For &lt;em&gt;E. coli&lt;/em&gt;</td></tr><tr><td>Acetosyringone</td><td>MilliporeSigma</td><td>D134406</td><td>Optional</td></tr><tr><td>Agar</td><td>MilliporeSigma</td><td>A4800</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Agarose</td><td>GeneMate</td><td>E-3120</td><td>For making gels to check for virus/insert stability</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;em&gt;Agrobacterium tumefaciens&lt;/em&gt; Strain GV3101</td><td></td><td></td><td>Carries &lt;em&gt;vir&lt;/em&gt; plasmid encoding T-DNA transfer machinery, Rif&lt;sup&gt;R&lt;/sup&gt;, Gm&lt;sup&gt;R&lt;/sup&gt;, from lab stock</td></tr><tr><td>Bsu36I</td><td>New England Biolabs</td><td>R0524</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>cDNA Kit</td><td>ThermoFisher Scientific</td><td>K1672</td><td>Maxima First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit with Dnase</td></tr><tr><td>Chloroform</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>C298</td><td>For RNA extraction</td></tr><tr><td>Cuvettes</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>14955127</td><td>1.5 mL</td></tr><tr><td>D-(+)-Glucose</td><td>MilliporeSigma</td><td>G7528</td><td>Alkaline Lysis</td></tr><tr><td>DH5alpha Competent &lt;em&gt;E. coli&lt;/em&gt; Cells</td><td>New England Biolabs</td><td>C2987</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>DNA Ligase</td><td>ThermoFisher Scientific</td><td>K1422</td><td>Rapid DNA Ligation Kit</td></tr><tr><td>EDTA (Ethylenediamine Tetraacetic Acid, Disodium Salt Dihydrate)</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>S311</td><td>Alkaline Lysis</td></tr><tr><td>Ethanol</td><td></td><td></td><td>For RNA extraction</td></tr><tr><td>Fertilizer</td><td></td><td></td><td>Peters Fertilizer 15-15-15 Concentrate</td></tr><tr><td>Flat Inserts</td><td>T.O. Plastics</td><td>715357C</td><td>For germinating seeds in trays</td></tr><tr><td>Flats</td><td>T.O. Plastics</td><td>710245C</td><td>For germinating seeds in trays</td></tr><tr><td>FluorCam</td><td>Photon Systems Instruments</td><td></td><td>To assess maize plants for GFP expression before microscope</td></tr><tr><td>Fluorescence Microscope</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Gel Electrophoresis Box</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Gentamycin Sulfate</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>BP918</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Glacial Acetate</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>A38</td><td>Alkaline Lysis</td></tr><tr><td>Glycerol</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>G33-500</td><td>For saving frozen stocks of bacteria</td></tr><tr><td>Go-Taq, 2X</td><td>Promega</td><td>M7123</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Hydrochloric Acid</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>A144</td><td>for pHing solutions</td></tr><tr><td>Isopropanol</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>109827</td><td>For RNA extraction</td></tr><tr><td>Kanamycin, Monosulfate</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>BP906</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Large Pots</td><td>Kordlok</td><td>SQL0550</td><td>5x5x4&quot; or bigger.&amp;nbsp; For transplanting seedlings.</td></tr><tr><td>Luria Bertani (LB) Broth, Miller</td><td>Himedia</td><td>M1245</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Magnesium Sulfate Heptahydrate</td><td>Amresco</td><td>662</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Maize Golden Bantam Sweet Corn Seed</td><td>American Meadows, West Coast Seeds</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Maize Inbred Seed</td><td></td><td></td><td>Our seed comes from our institution, but we are &lt;strong&gt;not &lt;/strong&gt;able to provide this for other researchers.</td></tr><tr><td>Maxima H Minus Reverse Transcriptase</td><td>ThermoFisher Scientific</td><td>EP0753</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>MilliQ</td><td>Elga</td><td></td><td>Purelab Ultra</td></tr><tr><td>Monarch PCR &amp;amp; DNA Cleanup Kit</td><td>New England Biolabs</td><td>T1030</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>PacI</td><td>New England Biolabs</td><td>R0547</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Peters Excel 15-5-15 Fertilizer</td><td>ICL Specialty Fertilizers</td><td>G99140</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Petri Dish, 95 mm x 15 mm</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>FB0875714G</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>pH Meter</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Potassium Acetate</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>P171</td><td>Alkaline Lysis</td></tr><tr><td>Primers</td><td></td><td></td><td>Our primers were synthesized through our institutional DNA facility or through IDT</td></tr><tr><td>PspOMI</td><td>New England Biolabs</td><td>R0653</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase</td><td>New England Biolabs</td><td>M0491</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Rifampicin</td><td>EMD Millipore Corp</td><td>557303</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Rnase A</td><td>ThermoFisher Scientific</td><td>12091021</td><td>Alkaline Lysis</td></tr><tr><td>SbfI</td><td>New England Biolabs</td><td>R0642</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Scale</td><td></td><td></td><td>For weighing chemicals for media or buffers</td></tr><tr><td>SDS (Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate)</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>BP166</td><td>Alkaline Lysis</td></tr><tr><td>Sodium Hydroxide</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>S318</td><td>Alkaline Lysis</td></tr><tr><td>Soil Substrate</td><td>SunGro Horticulture</td><td>SS#1-F1P</td><td>Sunshine Mix #1/Fafard-1P, any soil mix that maize grows well in is sufficient</td></tr><tr><td>Spectrophotometer</td><td></td><td></td><td>For measuring OD600</td></tr><tr><td>Sybr Safe, 10,000X</td><td>Invitrogen</td><td>S33102</td><td>For making gels to check for virus/insert stability</td></tr><tr><td>Thermocycler</td><td></td><td></td><td>For PCR</td></tr><tr><td>Tris Base</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>BP154</td><td>Alkaline Lysis</td></tr><tr><td>Trizol</td><td>Ambion</td><td>15596018</td><td>For RNA extraction</td></tr><tr><td>Weigh Paper</td><td></td><td></td><td>For weighing chemicals for media or buffers</td></tr><tr><td>XbaI</td><td>New England Biolabs</td><td>R0145</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

direct agroinoculation of maize seedlings by injection with recombinant foxtail mosaic virus and sugarcane mosaic virus infectious clones

Agrobacterium-based inoculation approaches are widely used for introducing viral vectors into plant tissues. This study details a protocol for the injection of maize seedlings near meristematic tissue with Agrobacterium carrying a viral vector. Recombinant foxtail mosaic virus (FoMV) clones engineered for gene silencing and gene expression were used to optimize this method, and its use was expanded to include a recombinant sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV) engineered for gene expression. Gene fragments or coding sequences of interest are inserted into a modified, infectious viral genome that has been cloned into the binary T-DNA plasmid vector pCAMBIA1380. The resulting plasmid constructs are transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101. Maize seedlings as young as 4 days old can be injected near the coleoptilar node with bacteria resuspended in MgSO4 solution. During infection with Agrobacterium, the T-DNA carrying the viral genome is transferred to maize cells, allowing for the transcription of the viral RNA genome. As the recombinant virus replicates and systemically spreads throughout the plant, viral symptoms and phenotypic changes resulting from the silencing of the target genes lesion mimic 22 (les22)&#160;or&#160;phytoene desaturase (pds) can be observed on the leaves, or expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP) can be detected upon illumination with UV light or fluorescence microscopy. To detect the virus and assess the integrity of the insert simultaneously, RNA is extracted from the leaves of the injected plant and RT-PCR is conducted using primers flanking the multiple cloning site (MCS) carrying the inserted sequence. This protocol has been used effectively in several maize genotypes and can readily be expanded to other viral vectors, thereby offering an accessible tool for viral vector introduction in maize.

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Direct Agroinoculation of Maize Seedlings by Injection with Recombinant Foxtail Mosaic Virus and Sugarcane Mosaic Virus Infectious Clones at JoVE.com

Direct Agroinoculation of Maize Seedlings by Injection with Recombinant Foxtail Mosaic Virus and Sugarcane Mosaic Virus Infectious Clones

An Agrobacterium-based injection (agroinjection) protocol is presented for the inoculation of foxtail mosaic virus&#160;and sugarcane mosaic virusclones into maize seedlings. Inoculation in this manner leads to viral infection, virus-induced gene silencing of marker genes, and viral overexpression of GFP.

Agrobacterium-based inoculation approaches are widely used for introducing viral vectors into plant tissues. This study details a protocol for the ...

direct-agroinoculation-maize-seedlings-injection-with-recombinant

Universidad de Cartagena UDEC

Research

JoVE Journal

Biology

4.7K Views.  Iowa State University. An Agrobacterium-based injection (agroinjection) protocol is presented for the inoculation of foxtail mosaic virus and sugarcane mosaic virusclones into maize seedlings. Inoculation in this manner leads to viral infection, virus-induced gene silencing of marker genes, and viral overexpression of GFP.

Video: Direct Agroinoculation of Maize Seedlings by Injection with Recombinant Foxtail Mosaic Virus and Sugarcane Mosaic Virus Infectious Clones

A Rapid and Efficient Method for Assessing Pathogenicity of Ustilago maydis on Maize and Teosinte Lines

Maize is a major cereal crop worldwide. However, susceptibility to biotrophic pathogens is the primary constraint to increasing productivity. U. maydis is a biotrophic fungal pathogen and the causal agent of corn smut on maize. This disease is responsible for significant yield losses of approximately $1.0 billion annually in the U.S.1 Several methods including crop rotation, fungicide application and seed treatments are currently used to control corn smut2. However, host resistance is the only practical method for managing corn smut. Identification of crop plants including maize, wheat, and rice that are resistant to various biotrophic pathogens has significantly decreased yield losses annually3-5. Therefore, the use of a pathogen inoculation method that efficiently and reproducibly delivers the pathogen in between the plant leaves, would facilitate the rapid identification of maize lines that are resistant to U. maydis. As, a first step toward indentifying maize lines that are resistant to U. maydis, a needle injection inoculation method and a resistance reaction screening method was utilized to inoculate maize, teosinte, and maize x teosinte introgression lines with a U. maydis strain and to select resistant plants.
Maize, teosinte and maize x teosinte introgression lines, consisting of about 700 plants, were planted, inoculated with a strain of U. maydis, and screened for resistance. The inoculation and screening methods successfully identified three teosinte lines resistant to U. maydis. Here a detailed needle injection inoculation and resistance reaction screening protocol for maize, teosinte, and maize x teosinte introgression lines is presented. This study demonstrates that needle injection inoculation is an invaluable tool in agriculture that can efficiently deliver U. maydis in between the plant leaves and has provided plant lines that are resistant to U. maydis that can now be combined and tested in breeding programs for improved disease resistance.

A Rapid and Efficient Method for Assessing Pathogenicity of Ustilago maydis on Maize and Teosinte Lines

The use of a needle injection method to inoculate maize and teosinte plants with the biotrophic pathogen Ustilago maydis is described. The needle injection inoculation method facilitates the controlled delivery of the fungal pathogen in between the plant leaves where the pathogen enters the plant through the formation of appresoria. This method is highly efficient, enabling reproducible inoculations with U. maydis.

Maize is a major cereal crop worldwide. However, susceptibility to biotrophic pathogens is the primary constraint to increasing productivity. U. maydis is ...

Environment

Genetic Manipulation of the Plant Pathogen Ustilago maydis to Study Fungal Biology and Plant Microbe Interactions

Gene deletion plays an important role in the analysis of gene function. One of the most efficient methods to disrupt genes in a targeted manner is the replacement of the entire gene with a selectable marker via homologous recombination. During homologous recombination, exchange of DNA takes place between sequences with high similarity. Therefore, linear genomic sequences flanking a target gene can be used to specifically direct a selectable marker to the desired integration site. Blunt ends of the deletion construct activate the cell&#39;s DNA repair systems and thereby promote integration of the construct either via homologous recombination or by non-homologous-end-joining. In organisms with efficient homologous recombination, the rate of successful gene deletion can reach more than 50% making this strategy a valuable gene disruption system. The smut fungus Ustilago maydis is a eukaryotic model microorganism showing such efficient homologous recombination. Out of its about 6,900 genes, many have been functionally characterized with the help of deletion mutants, and repeated failure of gene replacement attempts points at essential function of the gene. Subsequent characterization of the gene function by tagging with fluorescent markers or mutations of predicted domains also relies on DNA exchange via homologous recombination. Here, we present the U. maydis strain generation strategy in detail using the simplest example, the gene deletion.

Genetic Manipulation of the Plant Pathogen Ustilago maydis to Study Fungal Biology and Plant Microbe Interactions

We describe a robust gene replacement strategy to genetically manipulate the smut fungus Ustilago maydis. This protocol explains how to generate deletion mutants to investigate infection phenotypes. It can be extended to modify genes in any desired way, e.g., by adding a sequence encoding a fluorescent protein tag.

Gene deletion plays an important role in the analysis of gene function. One of the most efficient methods to disrupt genes in a targeted manner is the ...

Genetics

Simple and Robust in vivo and in vitro Approach for Studying Virus Assembly

In viruses with positive-sense RNA genomes pathogenic to humans, animals and plants, progeny encapsidation into mature and stable virions is a cardinal phase during establishment of infection in a given host. Consequently, study of encapsidation deciphers the information regarding the know-how of the mechanism regulating virus assembly to form infectious virions. Such information is vital in formulating novel methods of curbing virus spread and disease control. Virus encapsidation can be studied in vivo and in vitro. Genome encapsidation in vivo is a highly regulated selective process involving macromolecular interactions and subcellular compartmentalization. Therefore, study leading to dissect events encompassing virus encapsidation in vivo would provide basic knowledge to understand how viruses proliferate and assemble. Recently in vitro encapsidation has been exploited for the research in the area of biomedical imaging and therapeutic applications. Non-enveloped plant viruses stand far ahead in the venture of in vitro encapsidation of the negatively charged foreign material. Brome mosaic virus (BMV), a non-enveloped multicomponent RNA virus pathogenic to plants, has been used as a model system for studying genome packaging in vivo and in vitro. For encapsidation assays in Nicotiana benthamiana plants, Agrobacterium -mediated transient expression, refer to as agroinfiltration, is an efficient and robust technique for the synchronized delivery and expression of multiple components to the same cell. In this approach, a suspension of Agrobacterium tumefaciens cells carrying binary plasmid vectors carrying cDNAs of desiredviral mRNAs is infiltrated into the intercellular space withina leaf using nothing more sophisticated than a 1 ml disposable syringe (without needle). This process results in the transfer of DNA insert into plant cells; the T-DNA insert remains transiently in the nucleus and is then transcribed by the host polymerase II, leading to the transient expression. The resulting mRNA transcript (capped and polyadenylated) is then exported to the cytoplasm for translation. After approximately 24 to 48 hours of incubation,sections of infiltrated leaves can be sampled for microscopyor biochemical analyses. Agroinfiltration permits large numbers (hundreds to thousands) of cells to be transfected simultaneously. For in vitro encapsidation, purified virions of BMV are dissociated into capsid protein by dialyzing against dissociation buffer containing calcium chloride followed by removal of RNA and un-dissociated virions by centrifugation. Genome depleted capsid protein subunits are then reassembled with desired viral genome components or non-viral components such as indocyanine dye.

Simple and Robust in vivo and in vitro Approach for Studying Virus Assembly

A simple, efficient and robust way to synchronize the delivery of multiple viral components to plant cells via Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression is described. This approach is amenable for studying replication, encapsidation followed by in vitro reassembly of non-viral components into genome depleted optical viral ghosts suitable for biomedical applications.

In viruses with positive-sense RNA genomes pathogenic to humans, animals and plants, progeny encapsidation into mature and stable virions is a cardinal ...

Immunology and Infection

Using Ustilago maydis as a Trojan Horse for In Situ Delivery of Maize Proteins

Inspired by Homer&#180;s Trojan horse myth, we engineered the maize pathogen Ustilago maydis to deliver secreted proteins into the maize apoplast permitting in vivo phenotypic analysis. This method does not rely on maize transformation but exploits microbial genetics and secretory capabilities of pathogens. Herein, it allows inspection of in vivo delivered secreted proteins with high spatiotemporal resolution at different kinds of infection sites and tissues. The Trojan horse strategy can be utilized to transiently complement maize loss-of-function phenotypes, to functionally characterize protein domains, to analyze off-target protein effects, or to study onside protein overdosage, making it a powerful tool for protein studies in the maize crop system. This work contains a precise protocol on how to generate a Trojan horse strain followed by standardized infection protocols to apply this method to three different maize tissue types.

Using Ustilago maydis as a Trojan Horse for In Situ Delivery of Maize Proteins

This work describes the cloning of an Ustilago maydis Trojan horse strain for the in situ delivery of secreted maize proteins into three different types of maize tissues.

Inspired by Homer&#180;s Trojan horse myth, we engineered the maize pathogen Ustilago maydis to deliver secreted proteins into the maize apoplast ...

Inhibition of Aspergillus flavus Growth and Aflatoxin Production in Transgenic Maize Expressing the &#945;-amylase Inhibitor from Lablab purpureus L.

Aflatoxin contamination in food and feed crops is a major challenge worldwide. Aflatoxins, produced by the fungus Aspergillus flavus (A. flavus) are potent carcinogens that substantially reduce crop value in maize and other oil rich crops like peanut besides posing serious threat to human and animal health. Different approaches, including traditional breeding, transgenic expression of resistance associated proteins, and RNA interference (RNAi)-based host-induced gene silencing of critical A. flavus gene targets, are being evaluated to increase aflatoxin resistance in susceptible crops. Past studies have shown an important role of &#945;-amylase in A. flavus pathogenesis and aflatoxin production, suggesting this gene/enzyme is a potential target to reduce both A. flavus growth and aflatoxin production. In this regard, the current study was undertaken to evaluate heterologous expression (under control of the constitutive CaMV 35S promoter) of a Lablab purpureus L. &#945;-amylase inhibitor-like protein (AILP) in maize against A. flavus. AILP is a 36-kDa protein, which is a competitive inhibitor of A. flavus &#945;-amylase enzyme and belongs to the lectin&#8211;arcelin&#8211;&#945;-amylase inhibitor protein family in common bean. In vitro studies prior to the current work had demonstrated the role of AILP in inhibition of A. flavus &#945;-amylase activity and fungal growth. Fungal growth and aflatoxin production in mature kernels were monitored in real time using a GFP-expressing A. flavus strain. This kernel screening assay (KSA) is very simple to set up and provides reliable and reproducible data on infection and the extent of spread that could be quantified for evaluation of germplasm and transgenic lines. The fluorescence from the GFP strain is closely correlated to fungal growth and, by extension, it is well-correlated to aflatoxin values.&#160; The goal of the current work was to implement this previous knowledge in a commercially important crop like maize to increase aflatoxin resistance. Our results show a 35%&#8211;72% reduction in A. flavus growth in AILP-expressing transgenic maize kernels which, in turn, translated into a 62%&#8211;88% reduction in aflatoxin levels.

Inhibition of Aspergillus flavus Growth and Aflatoxin Production in Transgenic Maize Expressing the &#945;-amylase Inhibitor from Lablab purpureus L.

Here we present a protocol to analyze Aspergillus flavus growth and aflatoxin production in maize kernels expressing an antifungal protein.&#160; Using a GFP-expressing A. flavus strain we monitored the infection and spread of the fungus in mature kernels in real time. The assay is rapid, reliable, and reproducible.

Aflatoxin contamination in food and feed crops is a major challenge worldwide. Aflatoxins, produced by the fungus Aspergillus flavus (A. flavus) are ...

Microinjection of Western Corn Rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera, Embryos for Germline Transformation, or CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing

The western corn rootworm (WCR) is an important pest of corn and is well known for its ability to rapidly adapt to pest management strategies. Although RNA interference (RNAi) has proved to be a powerful tool for studying WCR biology, it has its limitations. Specifically, RNAi itself is transient (i.e. does not result in long-term Mendelian inheritance of the associated phenotype), and it requires knowing the DNA sequence of the target gene. The latter can be limiting if the phenotype of interest is controlled by poorly conserved, or even novel genes, because identifying useful targets would be challenging, if not impossible. Therefore, the number of tools in WCR&#39;s genomic toolbox should be expanded by the development of methods that could be used to create stable mutant strains and enable sequence-independent surveys of the WCR genome. Herein, we detail the methods used to collect and microinject precellular WCR embryos with nucleic acids. While the protocols described herein are aimed at the creation of transgenic WCR, CRISPR/Cas9-genome editing could also be performed using the same protocols, with the only difference being the composition of the solution injected into the embryos.

Microinjection of Western Corn Rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera, Embryos for Germline Transformation, or CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing

Here we present protocols for collecting and microinjecting precellular western corn rootworm embryos for the purpose of performing functional-genomic assays such as germline transformation and CRISPR/Cas9-genome editing.

The western corn rootworm (WCR) is an important pest of corn and is well known for its ability to rapidly adapt to pest management strategies. Although ...

Bioengineering

Efficient Agroinfiltration of Plants for High-level Transient Expression of Recombinant Proteins

Mammalian cell culture is the major platform for commercial production of human vaccines and therapeutic proteins. However, it cannot meet the increasing worldwide demand for pharmaceuticals due to its limited scalability and high cost. Plants have shown to be one of the most promising alternative pharmaceutical production platforms that are robust, scalable, low-cost and safe. The recent development of virus-based vectors has allowed rapid and high-level transient expression of recombinant proteins in plants. To further optimize the utility of the transient expression system, we demonstrate a simple, efficient and scalable methodology to introduce target-gene containing Agrobacterium into plant tissue in this study. Our results indicate that agroinfiltration with both syringe and vacuum methods have resulted in the efficient introduction of Agrobacterium into leaves and robust production of two fluorescent proteins; GFP and DsRed. Furthermore, we demonstrate the unique advantages offered by both methods. Syringe infiltration is simple and does not need expensive equipment. It also allows the flexibility to either infiltrate the entire leave with one target gene, or to introduce genes of multiple targets on one leaf. Thus, it can be used for laboratory scale expression of recombinant proteins as well as for comparing different proteins or vectors for yield or expression kinetics. The simplicity of syringe infiltration also suggests its utility in high school and college education for the subject of biotechnology. In contrast, vacuum infiltration is more robust and can be scaled-up for commercial manufacture of pharmaceutical proteins. It also offers the advantage of being able to agroinfiltrate plant species that are not amenable for syringe infiltration such as lettuce and Arabidopsis. Overall, the combination of syringe and vacuum agroinfiltration provides researchers and educators a simple, efficient, and robust methodology for transient protein expression. It will greatly facilitate the development of pharmaceutical proteins and promote science education.

Plants offer a novel system for the production of pharmaceutical proteins on a commercial scale that is more scalable, cost-efficient and safe than current expression paradigms. In this study, we report a simple and convenient, yet scalable approach to introduce target-gene containing Agrobacterium tumefaciens into plants for protein transient expression.

Mammalian cell culture is the major platform for commercial production of human vaccines and therapeutic proteins. However, it cannot meet the increasing ...

Agroinfiltration and PVX Agroinfection in Potato and Nicotiana benthamiana

Agroinfiltration and PVX agroinfection are two efficient transient expression assays for functional analysis of candidate genes in plants. The most commonly used agent for agroinfiltration is Agrobacterium tumefaciens, a pathogen of many dicot plant species. This implies that agroinfiltration can be applied to many plant species. Here, we present our protocols and expected results when applying these methods to the potato (Solanum tuberosum), its related wild tuber-bearing Solanum species (Solanum section Petota) and the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana. In addition to functional analysis of single genes, such as resistance (R) or avirulence (Avr) genes, the agroinfiltration assay is very suitable for recapitulating the R-AVR interactions associated with specific host pathogen interactions by simply delivering R and Avr transgenes into the same cell. However, some plant genotypes can raise nonspecific defense responses to Agrobacterium, as we observed for example for several potato genotypes. Compared to agroinfiltration, detection of AVR activity with PVX agroinfection is more sensitive, more high-throughput in functional screens and less sensitive to nonspecific defense responses to Agrobacterium. However, nonspecific defense to PVX can occur and there is a risk to miss responses due to virus-induced extreme resistance. Despite such limitations, in our experience, agroinfiltration and PVX agroinfection are both suitable and complementary assays that can be used simultaneously to confirm each other&#39;s results.

Agroinfiltration and PVX Agroinfection in Potato and Nicotiana benthamiana

Agroinfiltration and PVX agroinfection are routine functional assays for transient ectopic expression of genes in plants. These methods are efficient assays in effectoromics strategies (rapid resistance and avirulence gene discovery) and crucial to modern research in molecular plant pathology. They meet the demand for robust high-throughput functional analysis in plants.

Agroinfiltration and PVX agroinfection are two efficient transient expression assays for functional analysis of candidate genes in plants. The most ...

Agrobacterium-Mediated Immature Embryo Transformation of Recalcitrant Maize Inbred Lines Using Morphogenic Genes

Demonstrated here is a detailed protocol for Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of maize inbred lines using morphogenic genes Baby boom (Bbm) and Wuschel2 (Wus2). Bbm is regulated by the maize phospholipid transferase gene (Pltp) promoter, and Wus2 is under the control of a maize auxin-inducible (Axig1) promoter. An Agrobacterium strain carrying these morphogenic genes on transfer DNA (T-DNA) and extra copies of Agrobacterium virulence (vir) genes are used to infect maize immature embryo explants. Somatic embryos form on the scutella of infected embryos and can be selected by herbicide resistance and germinated into plants. A heat-activated cre/loxP recombination system built into the DNA construct allows for removal of morphogenic genes from the maize genome during an early stage of the transformation process. Transformation frequencies of approximately 14%, 4%, and 4% (numbers of independent transgenic events per 100 infected embryos) can be achieved for W22, B73, and Mo17, respectively, using this protocol.

Agrobacterium-Mediated Immature Embryo Transformation of Recalcitrant Maize Inbred Lines Using Morphogenic Genes

Plant morphogenic genes can be used to improve genetic transformation of recalcitrant genotypes. Described here is an Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation (QuickCorn) protocol for three important public maize inbred lines.

Demonstrated here is a detailed protocol for Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of maize inbred lines using morphogenic genes Baby boom (Bbm) ...

Scalable Transfection of Maize Mesophyll Protoplasts

The transfection of maize mesophyll cells often involves digesting the plant cell walls to create protoplasts and then inserting DNA via electroporation or polyethylene glycol (PEG). Previous methods were developed to produce tens of thousands of transfected protoplasts at once. Here,&#160;we describe a straightforward method to isolate and transfect millions of leaf mesophyll protoplasts in maize (Zea mays L.). This streamlined process removes certain common protoplasting steps, such as washing in W5. Additionally, steps such as centrifugation, PEG-mediated transfection, and incubation have been modified to work with a greater number of protoplasts. The ability to express large libraries of plasmid constructs enables genome-scale experiments, such as massively parallel reporter assays in maize.

Here, we present a high-throughput protocol to transiently transfect millions of maize protoplasts for testing large libraries of plasmids in maize mesophyll cells.

The transfection of maize mesophyll cells often involves digesting the plant cell walls to create protoplasts and then inserting DNA via electroporation ...

Direct Agroinoculation of Maize Seedlings by Injection with Recombinant Foxtail Mosaic Virus and Sugarcane Mosaic Virus Infectious Clones

Podsumowanie

Przeglądaj więcej filmów

Rozdziały w tym wideo

A Rapid and Efficient Method for Assessing Pathogenicity of Ustilago maydis on Maize and Teosinte Lines

Genetic Manipulation of the Plant Pathogen Ustilago maydis to Study Fungal Biology and Plant Microbe Interactions

Simple and Robust in vivo and in vitro Approach for Studying Virus Assembly

Using Ustilago maydis as a Trojan Horse for In Situ Delivery of Maize Proteins

Inhibition of Aspergillus flavus Growth and Aflatoxin Production in Transgenic Maize Expressing the α-amylase Inhibitor from Lablab purpureus L.

Microinjection of Western Corn Rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera, Embryos for Germline Transformation, or CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing

Efficient Agroinfiltration of Plants for High-level Transient Expression of Recombinant Proteins

Agroinfiltration and PVX Agroinfection in Potato and Nicotiana benthamiana

Agrobacterium-Mediated Immature Embryo Transformation of Recalcitrant Maize Inbred Lines Using Morphogenic Genes

Scalable Transfection of Maize Mesophyll Protoplasts