In game theory, mixed strategies involve players choosing their actions randomly from a set of available options. This approach contrasts with pure strategies, where players select a specific action with certainty. Mixed strategies become relevant in scenarios where there is no pure strategy equilibrium.
A mixed-strategies Nash equilibrium occurs when players adopt strategies so that no one can benefit by unilaterally changing their own strategy, given the strategies of the others. In this equilibrium, every player's strategy is an optimal response to the others.
Consider the game of rock-paper-scissors, where players can choose between three options: rock, paper, or scissors. In this game, rock beats scissors, scissors beat paper, and paper beats rock. A tie occurs if both players select the same item. Since each choice can be countered, there is no dominant move, leading to the absence of a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium.
However, a mixed-strategies Nash equilibrium exists where each player selects either rock, paper, and scissors with equal probability (one-third each). This random strategy ensures unpredictability, maintaining a balance as no player can foresee the other's move.
This equilibrium demonstrates how mixed strategies can stabilize games by neutralizing direct counter-actions between players.
Du chapitre 18:
Now Playing
Game Theory
51 Vues
Game Theory
116 Vues
Game Theory
139 Vues
Game Theory
44 Vues
Game Theory
187 Vues
Game Theory
36 Vues
Game Theory
69 Vues
Game Theory
36 Vues
Game Theory
39 Vues
Game Theory
32 Vues
Game Theory
30 Vues
Game Theory
25 Vues
Game Theory
64 Vues
Game Theory
33 Vues
Game Theory
26 Vues
See More