In capital budgeting, selecting between mutually exclusive projects means choosing one option from a set of options, as both cannot be pursued simultaneously. This decision significantly impacts the company's future growth and financial health.
For example, an automobile company deciding between Project A, which generates $20,000 annually for seven years, and Project B, which generates $30,000 annually for five years, may use the Net Present Value (NPV) method. After discounting future cash flows at 8%, Project A has an NPV of approximately $4,000, while Project B yields a higher NPV of approximately $20,000, making Project B the preferable option.
When projects are mutually exclusive, selecting one precludes the other. In contrast, independent projects can be undertaken concurrently. For instance, owning a corner lot requires a choice between building a gas station or an apartment, but not both.
In such scenarios, the project with the highest NPV should be chosen, as it maximizes shareholder value. Relying solely on the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) can be misleading, so prioritizing NPV ensures the best long-term financial decision.
Aus Kapitel 7:
Now Playing
Capital Budgeting
63 Ansichten
Capital Budgeting
266 Ansichten
Capital Budgeting
146 Ansichten
Capital Budgeting
105 Ansichten
Capital Budgeting
329 Ansichten
Capital Budgeting
157 Ansichten
Capital Budgeting
89 Ansichten
Capital Budgeting
64 Ansichten
Capital Budgeting
77 Ansichten
Capital Budgeting
291 Ansichten
Capital Budgeting
173 Ansichten
Capital Budgeting
67 Ansichten
Capital Budgeting
182 Ansichten
Capital Budgeting
45 Ansichten
Capital Budgeting
50 Ansichten
See More
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Alle Rechte vorbehalten