Name: the other end of the leash: an experimental test to analyze how owners interact with their pet dogs
Uploaded: 2017-10-13T14:00:00.000+00:00
Duration: 8 min 59 s
Description: Watch this Scientific Journal Video about The Other End of the Leash: An Experimental Test to Analyze How Owners Interact with Their Pet Dogs at JoVE.com

作者感谢所有参与这项研究的所有人和狗, 以及那些进行实验的学生: 丽莎瓦利斯, 克劳迪娅 Rosam, 孙燕姿 Riemer 和茱莉亚. Schößwender。我们进一步感谢 Desirée Brucks 的可靠性编码, 他的支持, 卡琳·拜耳, 珍妮弗 Bentlage 和亚历山大·季米特洛夫 Orlic 的行政支持, 和彼得 Füreder 和沃尔夫冈伯格的技术帮助。我们感谢雷切尔修改了手稿的英文。资助: 目前的研究得到奥地利科学基金 (FWF) 项目 I 1271-B24 和匈牙利科研基金项目 OTKA-ANN 107726 的支持。b.t 还获得了匈牙利科学院的资助。此外, 我们还要感谢海伦娜 Manzenreiter 和他们对视频拍摄的帮助。此外, 我们感谢皇家 Canin 支持聪明的狗实验室。

此处描述的所有方法都是根据全球定位系统指南和在维也纳兽医大学实验中使用动物伦理委员会的国家立法批准的 (参考: 09/10/97/2012和 10/10/97/2012). 
 1. 参与者招募 <ol> <li> 招募220名业主 (这里, 187 女性, 33 男性; 平均年龄和 #177; SD = 38.64 和 #177; 13.57 年, 范围13-72 年) 宠物边境牧羊犬, 并邀请他们参加与他们的狗的行为研究(在这里, 125 女性 (45 绝育) 和95男性 (32 绝育); 平均年龄和 #177; SD = 48.07 和 #177; 42.43 月). </li>
</ol> 2。行为测试过程 <ol> <li> 预测试 <ol> <li> 欢迎所有者和狗到实验室, 并邀请他们熟悉实验室 (6 m X 5 m, 请参见 图 1 ). </li>
		<li> 向所有者解释5分钟的总体过程, 而狗则可以自由地探索房间. </li>
		<li> 将测试使用四数字摄像机放置在房间的四个角 (黑点命名和 #34; 照相机和 #34; 在 图 1 ) 中连接到测试室外的视频记录站. </li>
	</ol> </li> <li> 食品选择测试 <ol> <li> 让所有者坐在房间一侧的椅子上 (橙色正方形; #34; 椅子 (食物选择) 和 #34; 在 图 1 中). </li>
		<li> 为所有者提供一份调查表, 以记录狗和所有者 (即所有者年龄、所有者性别、狗龄、狗性、狗中性状态) 的人口统计信息, 以便所有者在设置和选择过程中不影响狗. </li>
		<li> 将狗拴在皮带上, 并将其系在与主人直接相反的墙上 (橙色曲线; 和 #34; 皮带 (食物选择 + 教学) 和 #34; 在 图 1 ) 中. </li>
		<li> 从位于所有者旁边的表 (橙色正方形; #34; 表和 #34; 在 图 1 ) 中, 取两个盘子 (一根香肠和一个空的). </li>
		<li> 向狗走去, 把两个盘子放在狗面前的地板上, 1 m 从彼此和 1.5 m 从狗 (橙色正方形; 和 #34;P 晚 1 (食物选择) 和 #34; 和 #34;P 晚 2 (食物选择) 和 #34; 在 图 1 ) </li>
		<li> 在狗后面走。站在狗后面看地板. </li>
		<li> 让主人站起来, 走到空盘子旁边蹲下. </li>
		<li> 让主人拿起盘子, 向狗展示这个盘子是有趣和美味的. 
		注意: 指示所有者显示对 5 s 的空盘的优先权, 但否则让所有者行为根据需要. </li>
		<li> 让所有者返回到椅子并继续填写调查表. </li>
		<li> 一旦主人坐回椅子上, 松开狗的皮带, 让它接近一个盘子. </li>
		<li> 一旦狗在15厘米内从一个盘子, 步行去拿起另一个盘子. </li>
		<li> 按住皮带并将狗带回起始位置 (橙色曲线在 图 1 )。从地板上收集另一个盘子, 把两个盘子都放回桌子上. </li>
		<li> 重复此过程 (步骤 2.2.2-2.2.12) 六次. </li>
	</ol> </li> <li> DNA 样本收集 <ol> <li> 让拥有者在 #34;D na 区域和 #34 的领/线上抓住狗; ( 图 1 )。解释, DNA 样本将收集从狗和 #39 的嘴的内侧。在这次测试中, 指示主人可以与狗交谈和宠物。允许所有者根据需要进行行为. </li>
		<li> 取标本, 蹲在靠近狗的一侧, 轻轻地在口腔内侧旋转棉签。用第二次拭子重复. </li>
		<li> 重复该过程两次, 每一侧的狗和 #39 的嘴. </li>
	分离后的 </ol> </li> <li> 团聚 <ol> <li> 让拥有者离开实验室, #34;D oor 1 和 #34; ( 图 1 ) 为3分钟, 而狗留在房间内释放和自由移动. </li>
		<li> 让主人回到房间里 #34;D oor 1 和 #34; 然后停在门边 (蓝色正方形; #34; 所有者位置 2 (团聚 + 命令)) 5 s 不与狗互动。让主人在三十年代向狗问好. 指示主人在家里向狗问好. </li>
	</ol> </li> <li> 拔河游戏 <ol> <li> 让拥有者用绳子玩具在三十年代和狗玩拔河比赛. 指示主人与狗玩, 因为他们通常会在日常玩耍的情况. </li>
	</ol> </li> <li> t恤 <ol> <li> 让主人把 t恤放在狗头上, 把每一个前爪的袖子一个接一个, 并绑在底部的 t恤上的狗和 #39 的一个结; 回来. </li>
		<li> 让主人绕着房间走, 无视狗。三十年代以后, 让主人把 t恤衫从狗身上移开。指示所有者在过程中不说话, 但应按预期的方式行为. </li>
	</ol> </li> <li> 基本命令 <ol> <li> 让实验者蹲在房间的一侧 (灰色正方形; #34; 在 图 1 ) 后面一个满是皱巴巴的报纸的盒子里. </li>
		<li> 让所有者站在相反的一侧 (灰色正方形; #34; 所有者位置 1 (命令) + 所有者位置 (球打) 和 #34; 在 图 1 ) </li>
		<li> 让主人打电话给狗, 让主人和狗都在灰色的正方形 (和 #34; 所有者位置 1 (命令) + 所有者位置 (球戏剧) 和 #34;), 狗面对门, 主人面对狗. </li>
		<li> 在满是皱巴巴的报纸的盒子里搜索东西, 以分散狗的主人和 #39 的命令. </li>
		<li> 让所有者向狗发出三简单命令。
		<ol> <li> 首先, 让所有者命令狗坐。一旦狗坐, 让主人命令狗躺下。一旦狗躺下, 让主人命令狗留下. </li>
		</ol> </li> <li> 留在命令之后, 让所有者向实验者走去, 等待十五年代, 除了实验者以外, 5 m 从狗 (蓝色正方形; 和 #34; 所有者位置 2 (团聚 + 命令) 和 #34; 在 图 1 中, 面向狗。让主人叫狗。在任务期间, 主人可以赞美和与狗交谈. </li>
	</ol> </li> <li> 教学 <ol> <li> 让所有者将狗拴在1米的皮带上 (曲线线; #34; 皮带 (食物选择 + 教学) 和 #34; 在 图 1 ) 和步行2米远离狗 (红色虚线区域; 和 #34;教学领域和 #34; 在 图 1 中). </li>
		<li> 让所有者显示狗如何从包含一条香肠的纸盒中取下盖子: <ol> <li> 用一只手握住一根香肠, 另一只手取下纸盒的盖子。把食物放在垃圾箱里, 然后盖回去。取出纸盒的盖子, 并在垃圾桶内显示食物. </li>
			<li>让所有者重复该过程四次. 
			注: 在整个过程中, 主人可以说话和看狗. </li>
		</ol> </li> </ol> </li> <li> 播放 <ol> <li> 让所有者站在房间的特定位置 (灰色正方形;打球; 图 1 )#160; 把网球扔向房间的另一侧。让主人要求狗取回球. </li>
		<li> 让所有者重复该过程三次. 
		注意: 指示主人与狗玩, 因为他们通常会在日常玩耍的情况. </li>
	</ol> </li> </ol> 3。行为编码 <ol> <li> 分析测试过程中拍摄的视频, 并在电子表格上记录以下行为: <ol> <li> 对行为变量进行评分; 沟通方式, 积极的社会支持, 温暖和发挥风格的4点的规模, 并得分3分音阶的热情和独裁行为。有关每个值的定义, 请参见表 1. </li>
		<li> 计算表1中所示情况下的命令、赞美、爱抚和注意声音的数量. </li>
	</ol> </li> <li> 为编码变量的列表和定义提供第二个编码器。有第二个编码器代码20% 的视频计算评分的可靠性. </li>
</ol> 4。数据处理 <ol> <li> 在表2中描述的2或4磅的比例转换所有计数变量. </li>
	<li> 在所有行为变量上运行具有 Oblimin 旋转的探索性因子分析 (普及教育)。根据碎石图定义要提取的因子数。使用回归方法提取因子, 并排除缺少的值列表. </li>
	<li> 使用克隆和 #180 计算提取因子的内部一致性。比较主编码器提供的数据和使用科恩和 #180 的第二个编码, 以测量评分的可靠性. </li>
</ol>

<ol>
	<li>Mikl&#243;si, &. #. 1. 9. 3. ;., Top&#225;l, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=What+does+it+take+to+become+"best+friends"?+Evolutionary+changes+in+canine+social+competence.">What does it take to become "best friends"? Evolutionary changes in canine social competence.</a> Trends Cogn Sci. 17 (6), 287-294 (2013).</li><li>Top&#225;l, J., Mikl&#243;si, &. #. 1. 9. 3. ;., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=The+Dog+as+a+Model+for+Understanding+Human+Social+Behavior.">The Dog as a Model for Understanding Human Social Behavior.</a> Adv Study Behav. 39 (9), 71-116 (2009).</li><li>Payne, E., Bennett, P. C., McGreevy, P. D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Current+perspectives+on+attachment+and+bonding+in+the+dog-human+dyad.">Current perspectives on attachment and bonding in the dog-human dyad.</a> Psychol Res Behav Manag. 8, 71-79 (2015).</li><li>&#211; S&#250;illeabh&#225;in, P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Training+Methods+and+Dog-Owner+Interaction+as+a+Public+Health+Risk+Factor+for+Dog+Bites.">Training Methods and Dog-Owner Interaction as a Public Health Risk Factor for Dog Bites.</a> Zoonoses Public Health. 62 (6), 489 (2015).</li><li>&#211; S&#250;illeabh&#225;in, P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Human+hospitalisations+due+to+dog+bites+in+Ireland+(1998-2013):+Implications+for+current+breed+specific+legislation.">Human hospitalisations due to dog bites in Ireland (1998-2013): Implications for current breed specific legislation.</a> Vet J. 204 (3), 357-359 (2015).</li><li>Patronek, G. J., Sacks, J. J., Delise, K. M., Cleary, D. V., Marder, A. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Co-occurrence+of+potentially+preventable+factors+in+256+dog+bite-related+fatalities+in+the+United+States+(2000-2009).">Co-occurrence of potentially preventable factors in 256 dog bite-related fatalities in the United States (2000-2009).</a> J Am Vet Med Assoc. 243 (12), 1726-1736 (2013).</li><li>Fratkin, J. L., Sinn, D. L., Patall, E. A., Gosling, S. D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Personality+Consistency+in+Dogs:+A+Meta-Analysis.">Personality Consistency in Dogs: A Meta-Analysis.</a> PLoS One. 8 (1), e54907 (2013).</li><li>Kobelt, A. J., Hemsworth, P. H., Barnett, J. L., Coleman, G. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+survey+of+dog+ownership+in+suburban+Australia-conditions+and+behaviour+problems.">A survey of dog ownership in suburban Australia-conditions and behaviour problems.</a> Appl Anim Behav Sci. 82 (2), 137-148 (2003).</li><li>Herron, M. E., Shofer, F. S., Reisner, I. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Survey+of+the+use+and+outcome+of+confrontational+and+non-confrontational+training+methods+in+client-owned+dogs+showing+undesired+behaviors.">Survey of the use and outcome of confrontational and non-confrontational training methods in client-owned dogs showing undesired behaviors.</a> Appl Anim Behav Sci. 117 (1-2), 47-54 (2009).</li><li>Arhant, C., Bubna-Littitz, H., Bartels, A., Futschik, A., Troxler, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Behaviour+of+smaller+and+larger+dogs:+Effects+of+training+methods,+inconsistency+of+owner+behaviour+and+level+of+engagement+in+activities+with+the+dog.">Behaviour of smaller and larger dogs: Effects of training methods, inconsistency of owner behaviour and level of engagement in activities with the dog.</a> Appl Anim Behav Sci. 123 (3-4), 131-142 (2010).</li><li>Mitchell, R. W. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Americans'+Talk+to+Dogs:+Similarities+and+Differences+With+Talk+to+Infants.">Americans' Talk to Dogs: Similarities and Differences With Talk to Infants.</a> Res Lang Soc Interact. 34 (2), 183-210 (2001).</li><li>Jones, A. C., Josephs, R. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Interspecies+hormonal+interactions+between+man+and+the+domestic+dog+(Canis+familiaris).">Interspecies hormonal interactions between man and the domestic dog (Canis familiaris).</a> Horm Behav. 50 (3), 393-400 (2006).</li><li>Prato-Previde, E., Fallani, G., Valsecchi, P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Gender+Differences+in+Owners+Interacting+with+Pet+Dogs:+An+Observational+Study.">Gender Differences in Owners Interacting with Pet Dogs: An Observational Study.</a> Ethology. 112 (1), 64-73 (2006).</li><li>Horv&#225;th, Z., D&#243;ka, A., Mikl&#243;si, &. #. 1. 9. 3. ;. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Affiliative+and+disciplinary+behavior+of+human+handlers+during+play+with+their+dog+affects+cortisol+concentrations+in+opposite+directions.">Affiliative and disciplinary behavior of human handlers during play with their dog affects cortisol concentrations in opposite directions.</a> Horm Behav. 54 (1), 107-114 (2008).</li><li>Rooney, N. J., Cowan, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Training+methods+and+owner-dog+interactions:+Links+with+dog+behaviour+and+learning+ability.">Training methods and owner-dog interactions: Links with dog behaviour and learning ability.</a> Appl Anim Behav Sci. 132 (3-4), 169-177 (2011).</li><li>Kis, A., Turcs&#225;n, B., Mikl&#243;si, &. #. 1. 9. 3. ;., G&#225;csi, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=The+effect+of+the+owner's+personality+on+the+behaviour+of+owner-dog+dyads.">The effect of the owner's personality on the behaviour of owner-dog dyads.</a> Interact Stud. 13 (3), 373-385 (2012).</li><li>Cimarelli, G., Turcs&#225;n, B., B&#225;nlaki, Z., Range, F., Vir&#225;nyi, Z. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Dog+Owners'+Interaction+Styles:+Their+Components+and+Associations+with+Reactions+of+Pet+Dogs+to+a+Social+Threat.">Dog Owners' Interaction Styles: Their Components and Associations with Reactions of Pet Dogs to a Social Threat.</a> Front Psychol. 7, 1979 (2016).</li><li>Blackwell, E. J., Twells, C., Seawright, A., Casey, R. a. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=The+relationship+between+training+methods+and+the+occurrence+of+behavior+problems,+as+reported+by+owners,+in+a+population+of+domestic+dogs.">The relationship between training methods and the occurrence of behavior problems, as reported by owners, in a population of domestic dogs.</a> J Vet Behav. 3, 207-217 (2008).</li><li>Skinner, E., Johnson, S., Snyder, T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Six+Dimensions+of+Parenting:+A+Motivational+Model.">Six Dimensions of Parenting: A Motivational Model.</a> Parenting. 5 (2), 175-235 (2005).</li><li>Davidov, M., Grusec, J. E. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Untangling+the+Links+of+Parental+Responsiveness+to+Distress+and+Warmth+to+Child+Outcomes.">Untangling the Links of Parental Responsiveness to Distress and Warmth to Child Outcomes.</a> Child Dev. 77 (1), 44-58 (2006).</li><li>Kuppens, S., Laurent, L., Heyvaert, M., Onghena, P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Associations+between+parental+psychological+control+and+relational+aggression+in+children+and+adolescents:+A+multilevel+and+sequential+meta-analysis.">Associations between parental psychological control and relational aggression in children and adolescents: A multilevel and sequential meta-analysis.</a> Dev Psychol. 49 (9), 1697-1712 (2013).</li><li>Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., Draper, P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Childhood+experience,+interpersonal+development,+and+reproductive+strategy:+An+evolutionary+theory+of+socialization.">Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization.</a> Child Dev. 62 (4), 647-670 (1991).</li><li>Barber, B. K., Harmon, E. L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Violating+the+self:+Parental+psychological+control+of+children+and+adolescents.">Violating the self: Parental psychological control of children and adolescents.</a> Intrusive parenting: How psychological control affects children and adolescents. , 15-52 (2002).</li><li>Top&#225;l, J., Mikl&#243;si, &. #. 1. 9. 3. ;., Cs&#225;nyi, V., D&#243;ka, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Attachment+behavior+in+dogs+(Canis+familiaris):+A+new+application+of+Ainsworth’s+(1969)+Strange+Situation+Test.">Attachment behavior in dogs (Canis familiaris): A new application of Ainsworth’s (1969) Strange Situation Test.</a> J Comp Psychol. 112 (3), 219-229 (1998).</li><li>Prato-Previde, E., Custance, D. M., Spiezio, C., Sabatini, F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Is+the+dog-human+relationship+an+attachment+bond?+An+observational+study+using+Ainsworth's+strange+situation.">Is the dog-human relationship an attachment bond? An observational study using Ainsworth's strange situation.</a> Behav. 140 (2), 225-254 (2003).</li><li>Holden, G. W., Edwards, L. a. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Parental+attitudes+toward+child+rearing:+Instruments,+issues,+and+implications.">Parental attitudes toward child rearing: Instruments, issues, and implications.</a> Psychol Bull. 106 (1), 29-58 (1989).</li><li>Power, T. G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Parenting+Dimensions+and+Styles:+A+Brief+History+and+Recommendations+for+Future+Research.">Parenting Dimensions and Styles: A Brief History and Recommendations for Future Research.</a> Child Obes. 9 (s1), S-14-S-21 (2013).</li><li>Gottman, J. M., Katz, L. F., Hooven, C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Parental+meta-emotion+philosophy+and+the+emotional+life+of+families:+Theoretical+models+and+preliminary+data.">Parental meta-emotion philosophy and the emotional life of families: Theoretical models and preliminary data.</a> J Fam Psychol. 10 (3), 243-268 (1996).</li><li>Holtgraves, T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Social+Desirability+and+Self-Reports:+Testing+Models+of+Socially+Desirable+Responding.">Social Desirability and Self-Reports: Testing Models of Socially Desirable Responding.</a> Pers Soc Psychol B. 30 (2), 161-172 (2004).</li><li>Gere, M. K., Villab&#248;, M. A., Torgersen, S., Kendall, P. C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Overprotective+parenting+and+child+anxiety:+The+role+of+co-occurring+child+behavior+problems.">Overprotective parenting and child anxiety: The role of co-occurring child behavior problems.</a> J Anxiety Disord. 26 (6), 642-649 (2012).</li><li>Holmbeck, G. N., Johnson, S. Z., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Observed+and+perceived+parental+overprotection+in+relation+to+psychosocial+adjustment+in+preadolescents+with+a+physical+disability:+The+mediational+role+of+behavioral+autonomy.">Observed and perceived parental overprotection in relation to psychosocial adjustment in preadolescents with a physical disability: The mediational role of behavioral autonomy.</a> J Consult Clin Psychol. 70 (1), 96-110 (2002).</li></ol>

作者没有什么可透露的。

所有者交互风格测试是一项新开发的协议, 旨在分析在许多不同情况下狗主人对狗的表现。我们定义了三影响宠物狗主人互动风格的因素, 这与温暖、社会支持和控制有关。三因素显示了与人类养育所确定的维度的相似性21,22,29。此外, 这里发现的两个因素与业主年龄显著相关, 暗示了年龄对所有者互动风格的调节作用。
在以前的研究中, 使用这里提出的方法, 我们还发现了所有者互动因素和人格特质之间的关联 (即所有者控制与开放性之间的负关联, 所有者社会支持与责任心, 和所有者的热情和开放之间的积极联系)18。在此基础上, 在当前的研究中, 我们还发现了所有者相互作用因素和狗行为之间的关联 (例如, 狗的接近寻求行为对所有者和所有者温暖之间的积极关联)18。同时, 结果表明, 目前的方法提供了可靠的和有用的衡量人类社会行为, 可以促进动物-人的互动, 人的个性, 和社会心理学领域。
客观行为分析结合因素分析方法, 使得对行为的客观评价比使用所有者报告或调查问卷更具有客观性。inter-coder 可靠性分析证实, 该结果是可靠的, 并没有编码器的偏见/主观性。本议定书是第一个全面分析狗主人的行为在各种情况下, 反映日常生活的狗业主母婴。这包括所有者行为的组分, 所有者不必要故意地使用影响他们的狗或他们甚而神志清楚地知道。因此, 所有者交互样式测试涵盖的行为范围远比其他调查人类-动物交互的研究更广泛, 其中许多都集中在训练或口述命令4,11,16,19。
所有者交互样式的三组分之一, 即所有者社会支持因素, 与所有者个性或狗行为没有关联18。作为一种可能的解释, 这一因素在其目前的形式可能不仅包括适当的支持, 但也过分保护行为。在儿童, 充分支持和过分保护的养育导致不同的行为结果31, 这也可能是在狗的情况。出于这个原因, 呵护和足够的支持需要更好的迎刃而解, 例如, 增加了一个关于所有者的侵扰和防止狗的独立行为的全球评级规模32。
所描述的方法的最关键的方面是所有者可能犯下协议的错误。因此, 我们建议在测试之前向所有者提供详细的书面协议, 以便他们对测试的执行情况形成一个总体的概念。此外, 在每 sub-test 之前, 实验者应再次解释细节和所有者的具体职责。此外, 业主应只指示他们需要执行的实际任务, 但不是关于他们应该如何执行, 让他们的行为, 因为他们通常会 (这是我们想要衡量) 而不是他们 ' 认为 ' 测试要求他们行为.此外, 在基本命令测试 (见协议), 有可能狗不会执行的行为要求的主人。如果发生这种情况, 所有者将重复命令, 最多3分钟。在球打测试中, 当被问及时, 狗可能无法取回球。在这种情况下, 业主可以从地板上的球, 移动到起始位置, 并继续执行过程。如果狗采取球, 但不给它的主人, 主人可以把球从狗的方式, 他们通常会采取的对象从狗。
上下文, 知道他们被观察并且被记录, 可能影响狗所有者的行为。即使是被动观察 (即在测试过程中在场的实验者) 也可能会阻止主人使用消极的行为 (如严厉训斥, 皮带牵引等), 他们可能认为这是不能公开接受的, 即使他们通常会使用它.这种现象 (在心理学中被称为社会可取性偏见30) 在测试人类行为时很常见。我们的建议是在测试开始之前让所有者尽可能舒适, 并告知所有者测试是关于狗的行为或狗主人的互动, 而不是只针对所有者的行为。此外, 本议定书的目的是为成年狗 (超过一年), 因此可能需要进一步修改, 如果测试狗幼犬。
然而, 这里开发的方法为各种研究目的提供了一个有用的工具。例如, 未来的研究可以进一步阐述所有者互动风格如何影响宠物狗的行为特征, 它们如何随着时间的推移而发展和变化, 它们如何与所有者的个人特征 (例如, 个性,人际行为), 以及他们如何影响业主的满意与狗主人的债券。此外, 我们的方法也可以有直接的实际应用 (例如, 狗培训师, 兽医, 和其他狗的从业人员), 并最终帮助改善宠物狗的福利。特别是, 该测试可以用来调查是否和如何所有者互动风格影响狗的行为问题, 如侵略性, 推进的领域狗咬预防和行为医学。此外, 所有者互动风格和父母教养方式之间的强烈相似性为直接比较动物的互动方式和养育方式提供了可能性。此外, 该议定书允许调查是否有类似的心理, 人口, 环境和文化因素影响/驾驶父母和狗的照顾行为, 它将允许使用狗-人的互动模型亲子关系的发展和进展。

人类是生活在西方家庭中的宠物狗的主要社会伙伴, 研究狗和人类之间相互建立的关系, 从理论和应用两个角度来看都是重要的1。事实上, 与人类紧密进化的狗, 可以作为人类社会技能进化的模型来研究2。此外, 狗在人类环境中的广泛存在给社会带来了实际问题, 对人类安全、狗的福利和双方的健康都有影响3。事实上, 它已经表明, 在训练过程中处理他们的狗的方式 (例如使用-技术) 是与狗对人和 conspecifics 的侵略, 强调考虑如何主人的行为的重要性与它的狗咬伤预防4,5,6。然而, 大多数旨在调查狗主人关系的研究只集中在一个伙伴身上: 狗。虽然已经开发了数以百计的测量来描述的一个或多个方面的狗的行为7, 迄今尚未有系统地编码的主人如何对他们的狗在各种情况下的行为。虽然许多研究使用问卷 (例如8,9,10,11) 获取有关所有者行为特征的信息, 但很少有研究使用行为观察分析狗主人与宠物狗互动的方式12,13,14,151617然而, 这些后研究只在少数情况下调查狗主人的行为 (在一个12、13、15、17和三16之间, 以及主要上下文具有正价 (例如, 播放12,14,15), 只有三的这些研究是在一个标准化环境中进行的 14,15,17。此外, 大多数研究的重点是培训方法4,111619, 由所有者在特定的上下文中应用, 如教狗特定行为或修改不想要的。然而, 正式培训只是一种方式, 业主与他们的狗互动, 它可能不仅取决于业主自己的特点, 但也在狗学校, 他们参加。因此, 主人训练他们的狗的方式可能不可靠地反射他们自发地与他们互动和沟通在日常生活情况下, 与后者可能是更加重要的在影响狗的每天行为。考虑到缺乏对狗主人行为特征的标准化测量, 我们开发了第一个行为测试, 目的是分析业主如何在反映日常情况的任务中与宠物狗进行互动。
研究表明, 人类婴儿的行为受到与父母的日常互动的影响: 例如, 父母如何支持他们的 children´s 自主权20, 在痛苦情况下, 敏感和反应灵敏的父母是怎样的21, 以及家长如何控制其子级的行为22。所有这些元素都被证明在父母之间有很大的不同, 这些行为的组合被称为养育风格20,21,22,23,24.由于养狗人的关系被描述为类似于子母债券1,25,26, 因此假设所有者与其狗的交互方式也可以分为特定的行为模式 (即所有者交互样式), 但迄今尚未尝试创建此类类别。
为人父母的风格研究表明, 结合详细的观察编码和因子分析方法是不容易受编码器的偏见和更可靠的比全球评级和自我27。因此, 我们决定运用这种方法来研究狗主人的互动风格。本研究是在实验室环境中进行的, 由两个独立的编码者 (允许我们对评分的可靠性进行测试) 对所有者的行为进行录像和分析。这些任务旨在反映出狗主人母婴在西方城市化的环境中面临的日常情况。重要的是, 我们包括对狗的积极和负价的任务。我们使用的编码方案包括了反映语言、面部、物理和手势交流的变量的组合, 测量为计数和刻度。对于所有者交互样式的描述, 我们使用了探索性因素分析。
目前的方法不仅是第一个专门开发的描述宠物狗主人的行为特征在许多不同的上下文, 但它也允许识别所有者交互维度, 这可能显示高相似性用于描述养育方式的维度18,28。
本白皮书详细介绍了整个过程, 并介绍了在 Cimarelli et al. (2016)18中完整发布的一些结果。

<table><tbody><tr><td>Videocamera</td><td>Samsung</td><td>ZA TZ6V3Z300274W</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Videocamera</td><td>Samsung</td><td>ZA TZ6V3Z300316J</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Videocamera</td><td>JVC</td><td>066C1124</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Videocamera</td><td>JVC</td><td>066C1123</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Chair</td><td>n.a.</td><td>n.a.</td><td>Material: plastic and metal. Color: black. With backrest and seat. Overall measures: 39 x 47 x 77 cm. Seat measures: 39 x 34 x 45 cm.</td></tr><tr><td>Leash</td><td>n.a.</td><td>n.a.</td><td>Material: nylon. Color: black. Measures: 2 x 300 cm.</td></tr><tr><td>Plates</td><td>n.a.</td><td>n.a.</td><td>Material: pottery. Color: white. Diameter: 25 cm.</td></tr><tr><td>Cotton swabs</td><td>n.a.</td><td>n.a.</td><td>Material: cotton. Color: white. Length: 7.6 cm.</td></tr><tr><td>Dog toy: rope</td><td>n.a.</td><td>n.a.</td><td>Material: cotton. Color: red. Diameter: 5 cm. Length: 30 cm</td></tr><tr><td>T-shirt</td><td>n.a.</td><td>n.a.</td><td>Material: cotton. Size M. Measures: 70 x 60 cm.</td></tr><tr><td>Carton box</td><td>n.a.</td><td>n.a.</td><td>Material: carton. Color: brown. Measures: 50 x 35 x 25.</td></tr><tr><td>Crumpled newspaper</td><td>n.a.</td><td>n.a.</td><td>Material: paper. From 3-4 newspapers.</td></tr><tr><td>Bin + lid</td><td>n.a.</td><td>n.a.</td><td>Material: plastic. Shape: round. Color: grey. Diameter: 20 cm. Height: 28 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Tennis ball</td><td>n.a.</td><td>n.a.</td><td>Material: rubber, nylon. Color: yellow. Diameter: 6.5 cm</td></tr></tbody></table>

the other end of the leash: an experimental test to analyze how owners interact with their pet dogs

有人建议, 业主与他们的狗的互动方式可以在很大程度上改变和影响狗主人的债券, 但很少有客观的研究, 到目前为止, 已经解决了如何业主与狗的互动。本研究的目的是通过客观观察和编码, 记录狗主人的互动方式。该实验包括八标准的情况下, 宠物狗的主人要求执行具体的任务, 包括积极的 (即玩, 教一个新的任务, 显示在食物搜索任务的偏好对象, 问候后分离) 和潜在的令人不安的任务 (即在 DNA 取样过程中的物理限制, 把 t恤衫放在狗身上, 在狗分心的时候给予基本的服从命令)。视频录音被编码离线使用一个专门设计的编码方案, 包括得分的沟通, 社会支持, 温暖, 热情, 和戏剧风格, 以及频率的行为, 如爱抚, 赞美, 命令, 和注意听.对20变量的探索性因素分析揭示了3因素, 被标记为所有者温暖, 所有者社会支持和所有者控制, 可以被看待作为类似物为人父母样式维度。这里介绍的实验程序代表了狗主人互动风格的第一个标准措施。这里提出的方法是一个有用的工具, 以调查个体变化的互动风格的宠物狗主人, 可以用来解释差异的狗-人的关系, 狗的行为结果, 和狗的压力应对策略, 所有从理论和应用的角度来看都是至关重要的因素。

探索性因素分析
在所有者互动风格测试中对行为变量进行分析的全民教育揭示了三因素占总方差的29.47%。凯撒-迈耶-Olkin (KMO) 测试结果的值为0.69。第一个因素被标记了 "所有者温暖 (方差解释: 17.41%, 内部一贯性: Cronbach´s α = 0.77) 并且它包括了以下行为可变物: 热情, 频率称赞和戏剧样式在球戏剧期间;拔河比赛中的热情、表扬频率和演奏风格;在团聚以后的温暖在分离以后;教学中的沟通方式;食物选择时的沟通方式。第二个因素, 标签为 "所有者社会支持" (方差解释: 6.64%; 内部一致性: Cronbach´s α = 0.68) 包括以下行为: 社会支持, 爱抚的频率, 并在 DNA 样本的赞美频率;t恤衫的社会支持;爱抚的频率, 和在基本命令期间赞美的频率。第三个因素被标记了 "所有者控制 (方差解释: 5.41%; 内部一贯性: Cronbach´s α = 0.49) 和它包括: 命令的频率在球戏剧期间;拔河比赛中注意声音和命令的频率;基本命令期间命令的频率。
提取因子之间的关系
因素 "所有者温暖" 并且 "所有者社会支持" 互相正面地相关 (Pearson´s r = 0.53, p和 #60; 0.01,图 2), 而 "所有者控制" 似乎独立于其他两个因素 ("所有者控制" vs。所有者温暖 ";Pearson´s r =-0.03, p和 #62; 0.05;"所有者控制" 与 "所有者社会支持";Pearson´s r =-0.05, p和 #62; 0.05)。
评分员间的可靠性
两个独立的程序员之间的协议之间的好, 以优秀的变量 (Cohen´s 卡伯 = 0.72-0.94)。
owners´人口学特征与提取因子的相关性
在以前的研究18中, 我们发现, 所有者的年龄与 "所有者温暖" (Pearson´s r =-0.25, p和 #60 有关, 0.01,图 3) 和与 "所有者社会支持" (Pearson´s r =-0.24, pand #60; 0.01,图 4), 但没有发现与 "所有者控制" (Pearson´s r = 0.12, p和 #62; 0.05) 的显着相关性。此外, 我们发现女性所有者在 "所有者温暖" 中得分高于男性所有者 (Pearson´s r = 0.15, p & #60; 0.05), 但不是在 "所有者社会支持" (Pearson´s r = 0.13, p和 #62; 0.05) 和 "所有者控制" (Pearson´sr = 0.04, p和 #62; 0.05)。此外, 我们还表明, "所有者控制" 与所谓的 "开放性" (Pearson´s r =-0.22, p和 #60; 0.01) 的人格因素有负相关, 并且 "所有者社会支持" 与人格负相关称为 "责任心" 的因素 (Pearson´s r =-0.16, p和 #60; 0.05)。
提取因子与狗行为的关联
目前的方法, 分析了狗主人的互动风格的各个方面, 允许调查的影响, 主人的行为, 他/她的狗的行为。在以前的研究18中, 我们分析了狗对压力情况的反应 (即一个陌生人以威胁的方式接近狗) 是否取决于主人的行为。在那里, 我们发现, 狗会躲在主人, 当接近一个威胁的陌生人更高的狗的主人在 "主人温暖" 比狗的主人得分更低 (Pearson´s r = 0.16, p和 #60; 0.05)。同样的, 当陌生人接近2米的狗主人二, 我们发现, 狗向主人或保持被动在整个威胁的方法, 拥有者比狗更高的 "主人温暖", 接近陌生人 (在友好, 姑息或侵略性的方式) (多项式回归模型: X2 = 8.94, p & #60; 0.05)。此外, 我们发现狗对威胁的陌生人的攻击可能更高, 狗的主人在 "主人控制" 中得分更高, 而狗的主人在这一因素中得分较低 (Pearson´s r =-0.15, p#60; 0.05)。
<img alt="Figure 1" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/56233/56233fig1.jpg"> 
图 1: 实验设置.这个数字代表了测试的实验室。房间有两个门 (门1和门 2) 在房间的一侧和四相机放置在房间的四角落 ("相机")。该图显示了主人、狗和实验者在整个测试中的位置, 以及椅子、桌子和食物选择测试中使用的盘子的位置。最后给出了 DNA 样本采集和教学测试的区域位置。<a href="//ecsource.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/56233/56233fig1large.jpg" target="_blank">请单击此处查看此图的较大版本.</a>
<img alt="Figure 2" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/56233/56233fig2.jpg"> 
图 2: "所有者温暖" 和 "所有者社会支持" 因素之间的积极关联 (Pearson´s r = 0.53, p和 #60; 0.01).<a href="//ecsource.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/56233/56233fig2large.jpg" target="_blank">请单击此处查看此图的较大版本.</a>
<img alt="Figure 3" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/56233/56233fig3.jpg"> 
图 3: "所有者温暖" 与所有者的年龄 (年) (Pearson´s r =-0.25, p和 #60; 0.01) 之间的负关联。较年长的业主在 "所有者温暖" 中得分低于年轻业主。此图已从18进行了改编。<a href="//ecsource.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/56233/56233fig3large.jpg" target="_blank">请单击此处查看此图的较大版本.</a>
<img alt="Figure 4" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/56233/56233fig4.jpg"> 
图 4: "所有者社会支持" 与所有者的年龄之间的负关联 (年) (Pearson´s r =-0.24, p和 #60; 0.01).年长业主在 "业主社会支持" 中的得分低于年轻业主。<a href=" href=""></a href=">ecsource/文件/ftp_upload/56233/56233fig4large. jpg "目标 =" _blank ">> 请点击这里查看这个数字更大的版本。
<table border="1" fo:keep-together.within-page="1" fo:keep-with-next.within-page="always">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>行为</td>
			<td>类型</td>
			<td colspan="3">定义</td>
			<td>测试中, 它是编码</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>沟通方式</td>
			<td>得分</td>
			<td colspan="3">1: 所有者以冷的方式表达他们的偏爱, 并且从不看狗;2: 所有者以冷的方式表达他们的偏爱, 但看狗至少一次, 但不比2秒;3: 所有者与狗使用友好, 高音调的声音和看狗不止一次。主人不笑;4: 主人与狗在友好, 高音音调的声音, 微笑和看狗几乎整个试验</td>
			<td>食物选择, 教学</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>热情</td>
			<td>得分</td>
			<td colspan="3">1: 所有者戏剧与显示低能量和没有参与的狗;2: 所有者戏剧与显示中等能量和缺乏参与的狗, 3: 所有者戏剧与显示高能和高参与的狗</td>
			<td>打球, 拔河游戏</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>称赞</td>
			<td>频率</td>
			<td colspan="3">口头上的话语以积极友好的语气发音 (例如, 德国的 "干得好!</td>
			<td>球类, 拔河游戏, DNA 样本, 基本命令</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>抚摸</td>
			<td>频率</td>
			<td colspan="3">拍, 划, 划痕</td>
			<td>DNA 样本, 基本命令</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>播放样式</td>
			<td>得分</td>
			<td colspan="3">1: 所有者不笑或微笑在戏剧会议期间, 连续给命令并且使用强/苛刻的口气。主人从不允许狗赢得比赛;2: 主人不笑或微笑在戏剧会议期间和可能给命令对狗使用强或苛刻的口气。主人从不允许狗赢得比赛;3: 主人是愉快和热心的在戏剧会议期间, 但不允许狗赢取比赛;4: 主人是愉快和热心的在戏剧会议期间并且让狗赢取比赛。</td>
			<td>打球, 拔河游戏</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>温暖</td>
			<td>得分</td>
			<td colspan="3">1: 主人是型和推挤下来狗, 如果她设法跳跃对她或他。主人不活跃地招呼狗并且可能给一些命令控制狗的行为;2: 主人是型, 但可以被动地接受狗的问候。主人不活跃地招呼狗并且可能给一些命令象 "坐下" 或 "下来" 控制狗的行为;3: 主人活跃地招呼狗并且讲话对狗在友好和高音调的声音;4: 主人清楚地微笑和招呼狗在兴奋的方式讲话对狗在友好和高音调的声调</td>
			<td>团聚在分离以后</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>社会支持</td>
			<td>得分</td>
			<td colspan="3">1: 所有者限制狗的运动使用力量, 从不使狗或口头上, 和身体和讲话与狗用苛刻的口气的声音;2: 主人限制狗的运动使用力量, 从不使狗不放心, 也不口头上, 也不使用刺耳的声调。3: 主人可能口头上和/或身体而不是连续地安抚狗。主人用温柔的方式对狗说话, 并在测试结束时赞美狗;4: 所有者口头上和/或者身体连续地使狗安心。主人用温柔的方式对狗说话, 在测试结束时赞美狗。</td>
			<td>DNA 样本, t恤衫</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>命令</td>
			<td></td>
			<td colspan="3">用命令语气发音的口头话语 (例如, "坐" 或 "留下来" 的德国等价物)</td>
			<td>球类, 拔河游戏, 基本命令</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>注意声音</td>
			<td>频率</td>
			<td colspan="3">拍手, 口哨, 舌头, 或腭的点击</td>
			<td>打球, 拔河游戏</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>独裁行为</td>
			<td>得分</td>
			<td colspan="3">1: 所有者不提高声音的口气没有强迫狗在一个坚定的位置;2: 所有者提高声音的口气;3: 所有者去物理力量狗在坚定的位置</td>
			<td>基本命令</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
表 1: 在所有者交互样式测试期间分析的行为的列表和定义.此表已从18进行了改编。
<table border="1" fo:keep-together.within-page="1" fo:keep-with-next.within-page="always">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>测试</td>
			<td>行为</td>
			<td>转换</td>
			<td>分布</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>DNA 样本采集</td>
			<td>命令</td>
			<td>N = 0 #62; 分数1</td>
			<td>34.60%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 1-2-和 #62; 分数2</td>
			<td>37.10%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 3-5-和 #62; 分数3</td>
			<td>17.10%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 6-19-和 #62; 分数4</td>
			<td>11.20%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td>注意声音</td>
			<td>N = 0 #62; 分数1</td>
			<td>77.80%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 1-5-和 #62; 分数2</td>
			<td>22.20%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td>抚摸</td>
			<td>N = 0 #62; 分数1</td>
			<td>25.40%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 1-2-和 #62; 分数2</td>
			<td>26.30%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 3-5-和 #62; 分数3</td>
			<td>26.80%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 6-20-和 #62; 分数4</td>
			<td>21.50%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td>称赞</td>
			<td>N = 0-4-和 #62; 分数1</td>
			<td>25.40%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 5-9-和 #62; 分数2</td>
			<td>26.30%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 10-14-和 #62; 分数3</td>
			<td>26.80%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 15-20-和 #62; 分数4</td>
			<td>21.50%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>拔河比赛</td>
			<td>命令</td>
			<td>N = 0 #62; 分数1</td>
			<td>38.00%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 1-2-和 #62; 分数2</td>
			<td>24.50%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 3-5-和 #62; 分数3</td>
			<td>27.40%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 6-13-和 #62; 分数4</td>
			<td></td></tr></tbody></table>10.10%
		
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td>注意声音</td>
			<td>N = 0 #62; 分数1</td>
			<td>68.60%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 1-13-和 #62; 分数2</td>
			<td>31.40%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td>称赞</td>
			<td>N = 0-4-和 #62; 分数1</td>
			<td>24.80%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 5-9-和 #62; 分数2</td>
			<td>27.60%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 10-14-和 #62; 分数3</td>
			<td>20.00%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 15-20-和 #62; 分数4</td>
			<td>27.60%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>基本命令</td>
			<td>命令</td>
			<td>N = 3-6-和 #62; 分数1</td>
			<td>29.20%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 7-9-和 #62; 分数2</td>
			<td>26.10%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 10-14-和 #62; 分数3</td>
			<td>22.80%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 15-50-和 #62; 分数4</td>
			<td>21.90%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td>抚摸</td>
			<td>N = 0 #62; 分数1</td>
			<td>13.20%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 1-2-和 #62; 分数2</td>
			<td>47.90%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 3-4-和 #62; 分数3</td>
			<td>19.60%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 5-10-和 #62; 分数4</td>
			<td>19.30%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td>称赞</td>
			<td>N = 0 #62; 分数1</td>
			<td>23.20%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 1 #62; 分数2</td>
			<td>33.30%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 2 #62; 分数3</td>
			<td>19.80%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 3-10-和 #62; 分数4</td>
			<td>23.70%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>打球</td>
			<td>命令</td>
			<td>N = 0 #62; 分数1</td>
			<td>23.70%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 1-2-和 #62; 分数2</td>
			<td>19.80%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 3-5-和 #62; 分数3</td>
			<td>30.00%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 6-77-和 #62; 分数4</td>
			<td>26.50%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td>注意声音</td>
			<td>N = 0 #62; 分数1</td>
			<td>42.50%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 1-16-和 #62; 分数2</td>
			<td>57.50%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td>称赞</td>
			<td>N = 0 #62; 分数1</td>
			<td>35.30%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 1-2-和 #62; 分数2</td>
			<td>29.00%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 3-4-和 #62; 分数3</td>
			<td>19.80%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>N = 5-10-和 #62; 分数4</td>
			<td>15.90%</td>
		</tr>
	

表2。初始编码为计数的行为变量的数据处理.命令, 赞美和爱抚的数量被转换成4点音阶, 而注意声音的数量被转化为2点音阶。此表已从18进行了改编。

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about The Other End of the Leash: An Experimental Test to Analyze How Owners Interact with Their Pet Dogs at JoVE.com

The Other End of the Leash: An Experimental Test to Analyze How Owners Interact with Their Pet Dogs

这篇文章提出了八不同的实验任务, 反映了狗和主人的日常生活, 用来分析业主如何以一种标准化的方式与他们的狗进行互动。这些任务包括积极的 (如游戏) 和消极 (可能有压力的) 情况 (如物理限制)。

皮带的另一端: 分析主人与宠物狗互动的实验测试

It has been suggested that the way in which owners interact with their dogs can largely vary and influence the dog-owner bond, but very few objective ...

the-other-end-leash-an-experimental-test-to-analyze-how-owners

Universidad de Cartagena UDEC

Research

JoVE Journal

Behavior

17.5K 次观看.  University of Veterinary Medicine of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, University of Vienna. 这篇文章提出了八不同的实验任务, 反映了狗和主人的日常生活, 用来分析业主如何以一种标准化的方式与他们的狗进行互动。这些任务包括积极的 (如游戏) 和消极 (可能有压力的) 情况 (如物理限制)。

视频: The Other End of the Leash: An Experimental Test to Analyze How Owners Interact with Their Pet Dogs

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors

Social interactions are a fundamental and adaptive component of the biology of numerous species. Social recognition is critical for the structure and stability of the networks and relationships that define societies. For animals, such as mice, recognition of conspecifics may be important for maintaining social hierarchy and for mate choice 1.
A variety of neuropsychiatric disorders are characterized by disruptions in social behavior and social recognition, including depression, autism spectrum disorders, bipolar disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorders, and schizophrenia. Studies of humans as well as animal models (e.g., Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, Mus musculus, Rattus norvegicus) have identified genes involved in the regulation of social behavior 2. To assess sociability in animal models, several behavioral tests have been developed (reviewed in 3). Integrative research using animal models and appropriate tests for social behavior may lead to the development of improved treatments for social psychopathologies.
The three-chamber paradigm test known as Crawley's sociability and preference for social novelty protocol has been successfully employed to study social affiliation and social memory in several inbred and mutant mouse lines (e.g. 4-7). The main principle of this test is based on the free choice by a subject mouse to spend time in any of three box's compartments during two experimental sessions, including indirect contact with one or two mice with which it is unfamiliar. To quantitate social tendencies of the experimental mouse, the main tasks are to measure a) the time spent with a novel conspecific and b) preference for a novel vs. a familiar conspecific. Thus, the experimental design of this test allows evaluation of two critical but distinguishable aspects of social behavior, such as social affiliation/motivation, as well as social memory and novelty. "Sociability" in this case is defined as propensity to spend time with another mouse, as compared to time spent alone in an identical but empty chamber 7. "Preference for social novelty" is defined as propensity to spend time with a previously unencountered mouse rather than with a familiar mouse 7. This test provides robust results, which then must be carefully analyzed, interpreted and supported/confirmed by alternative sociability tests. In addition to specific applications, Crawley's sociability test can be included as an important component of general behavioral screen of mutant mice.

Here we describe a detailed protocol for examination of sociability in mice by using Crawley's sociability and preference for social novelty test. We describe the advantages and possible applications for this procedure, including critical details important for correct interpretation of the results.

社会交往行为的评估

Social interactions are a fundamental and adaptive component of the biology of numerous species. Social recognition is critical for the structure and ...

科研

神经科学

Behavioral Disturbances: An Innovative Approach to Monitor the Modulatory Effects of a Nutraceutical Diet

In dogs, diets are often used to modulate behavioral disturbances related to chronic anxiety and stress caused by intense and restless activity. However, the traditional ways to monitor behavioral changes in dogs are complicated and not efficient. In the current clinical evaluation, a new, simple monitoring system was used to assess the effectiveness of a specific diet in positively modulating the intense and restless activity of 24 dogs of different ages and breeds. This protocol describes how to easily and rapidly evaluate improvement in a set of symptoms related to generalized anxiety by using a specific sensor, a mobile phone app, a wireless router, and a computer. The results showed that dogs treated with specific diets showed significant improvement in the times spent active and at rest after 10 days (p &lt; 0.01 and p &lt; 0.05, respectively). These dogs also showed an overall significant improvement in clinical and behavioral symptoms. A specific sensor, along with its related hardware, was demonstrated to successfully monitor behavioral changes relating to movement in dogs.

We report a simple approach to evaluate the effectiveness of a specific diet in positively modulating the daily activity and clinical and behavioral symptoms of dogs with evident behavioral disturbances.

行为障碍:一个创新的方法来监控保健品饮食的调节作用

In dogs, diets are often used to modulate behavioral disturbances related to chronic anxiety and stress caused by intense and restless activity. However, ...

行为学

Using a Comparative Species Approach to Investigate the Neurobiology of Paternal Responses

A goal of behavioral neuroscience is to identify underlying neurobiological factors that regulate specific behaviors. Using animal models to accomplish this goal, many methodological strategies require invasive techniques to manipulate the intensity of the behavior of interest (e.g., lesion methods, pharmacological manipulations, microdialysis techniques, genetically-engineered animal models). The utilization of a comparative species approach allows researchers to take advantage of naturally occurring differences in response strategies existing in closely related species. In our lab, we use two species of the Peromyscus genus that differ in paternal responses. The male California deer mouse (Peromyscus californicus) exhibits the same parental responses as the female whereas its cousin, the common deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) exhibits virtually no nurturing/parental responses in the presence of pups. Of specific interest in this article is an exploration of the neurobiological factors associated with the affiliative social responses exhibited by the paternal California deer mouse. Because the behavioral neuroscience approach is multifaceted, the following key components of the study will be briefly addressed: the identification of appropriate species for this type of research; data collection for behavioral analysis; preparation and sectioning of the brains; basic steps involved in immunocytochemistry for the quantification of vasopressin-immunoreactivity; the use of neuroimaging software to quantify the brain tissue; the use of a microsequencing video analysis to score behavior and, finally, the appropriate statistical analyses to provide the most informed interpretations of the research findings.

The comparative species approach allows behavioral neuroscientists to explore various neurobiological factors associated with specific behaviors viewed as characteristic of a specific animal model. Taking advantage of naturally occurring differences in behavior between closely related species, this technique doesn&#x2019;t require invasive techniques to manipulate the expression of the behavior.

使用方法比较物种调查父亲的反应神经生物学

A goal of behavioral neuroscience is to identify underlying neurobiological factors that regulate specific behaviors.  Using animal models to accomplish ...

Training Dogs for Awake, Unrestrained Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

We present a canine functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) training protocol that can be done in a cost-effective manner, with high-energy dogs, for acquisition of functional and structural data. This method of training dogs for awake, unrestrained fMRI employs a generalization procedure of stationing in several dissimilar locations to facilitate transfer of the stationing behavior to the real MRI scan environment; it does so without the need for extensive training time in the MRI scan environment, which can be expensive. Further, this method splits the training of a stationing (i.e., chin rest) behavior from desensitization to the MRI environment (i.e., 100+ decibel scan audio), the latter accomplished during dedicated Auditory Exposure conditioning sessions. The complete training and testing protocol required 14 hours and resulted in immediate transfer to novel locations. We also present examples of canine fMRI data that have been acquired from visual face processing and olfactory discrimination paradigms.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on unrestrained awake dogs is a new method with several advantages over imaging with physical or chemical restraint. This protocol introduces a cost-effective training method that minimizes training in the MRI environment, which can be expensive, and maximizes the subject pool available for canine functional MRI.

训练犬为觉醒，无节制的功能磁共振成像

We present a canine functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) training protocol that can be done in a cost-effective manner, with high-energy dogs, for ...

小鼠模型应激易感性或恢复力的威胁安全性测试

Social Threat-Safety Test Uncovers Psychosocial Stress-Related Phenotypes

Social stress is a major cause of the development of mental disorders. To enhance the translational value of preclinical studies, social stress experience and its behavioral impact on mice should be comparable to humans. Chronic social defeat (CSD) utilizes a type of social stress involving physical attacks and sensory threats to induce mental dysfunctions resembling human affective disorders. To strengthen the psychosocial component of CSD, a 10-day CSD protocol was applied in which daily physical attacks are standardized to three 10 s episodes followed by a 24 h sensory phase. After the 10th sensory phase, the CSD protocol is followed by a refined behavioral assay called the social threat-safety test (STST). Post-stress behavioral assays need to determine how and to what extent the social stressor has influenced behavior. The STST allows chronically socially defeated male mice to interact with 2 novel male individuals (social targets): one social target from the attacking strain encountered during the CSD days and the other from a novel strain. Both are presented simultaneously in different compartments of a three-chambered test arena. The test enables a simultaneous assessment of social avoidance development to measure successful aversive conditioned learning and social threat-safety discrimination ability. The development of social avoidance towards both strains reflects a generalized aversive response and thus, a measurement of stress susceptibility. Meanwhile, the development of social avoidance towards only the attacking strain reflects threat-safety discrimination and thus, a measurement of stress resilience. Finally, the absence of social avoidance towards the attacking strain reflects impaired aversive conditioned learning. The protocol aims to refine the currently used mouse models of stress susceptibility/resilience by including translational criteria, specifically threat-safety discrimination and aversive response generalization, to categorize a single group of chronically socially defeated animals into resilient and susceptible subgroups, eventually advancing future translational approaches.

作者聚焦:揭示压力恢复力的机制 - 重要发现、进展和未来研究

The social threat-safety test allows a simultaneous assessment of social avoidance development as a measurement of aversive conditioned learning and social threat-safety discrimination ability, both utilized to identify stress-susceptible and stress-resilient individuals within a single group of chronically socially defeated male mice.

社会威胁安全测试揭示了与社会心理压力相关的表型

Social stress is a major cause of the development of mental disorders. To enhance the translational value of preclinical studies, social stress experience ...

基于正强化的常规兔子饲养程序训练

Training Laboratory Rabbits to Refine Routine Husbandry Procedures

Non-aversive handling and training techniques for laboratory animals are required to facilitate experimental and routine husbandry procedures, improving both animal welfare and scientific quality. Clicker training was utilized to develop training protocols for rabbits to refine stressful routine husbandry procedures usually associated with lifting (i.e., being picked up from the floor)/restraining (i.e., being held in the arms of a human) them. Thirteen female New Zealand White rabbits were trained over three weeks. All rabbits learned the predefined goal behaviors: they followed the target stick, jumped onto the weighing scale, entered a transport box, and reared while placing their front paws onto the trainer&#39;s hand. In addition, ten animals jumped from the floor onto the sitting trainer&#39;s lap and allowed the trainer to lift their paws off the surface while sitting on the trainer&#39;s lap. For some individuals, the protocols had to be adapted by additional interim steps. At the end of the training, the rabbits reliably showed the expected goal behaviors, even after short and long training breaks. With few exceptions, a familiar person other than the trainer could elicit the goal behaviors from the rabbits (generalization), though further sessions were required for generalization. In the voluntary approach test, the rabbits preferred interacting with the trainer in the 1st trial but spent as much time with an unfamiliar person as with the trainer in the 2nd trial. The behavioral observations suggested that picking the rabbits up with the transport box, as described in the protocol, instead of restraining them with the scruff of their neck and lifting them on the arm, was less aversive. All in all, the training protocols were feasible and can serve as a refinement strategy in laboratory animal facilities. In the interest of animal welfare, the training protocols should be applied wherever possible.

作者聚焦：训练实验动物进行轻柔、无压力的处理

Training protocols involving positive reinforcement for routine husbandry procedures in rabbits were developed and proved to be successful, as the rabbits reliably showed the trained behaviors at the weekly general examination. Picking the rabbits up with the transport box was less aversive than the conventional handling technique.

训练实验兔改进常规饲养程序

Non-aversive handling and training techniques for laboratory animals are required to facilitate experimental and routine husbandry procedures, improving ...

皮带的另一端: 分析主人与宠物狗互动的实验测试

摘要

探索更多视频

此视频中的章节

社会交往行为的评估

行为障碍:一个创新的方法来监控保健品饮食的调节作用

使用方法比较物种调查父亲的反应神经生物学

训练犬为觉醒，无节制的功能磁共振成像

社会威胁安全测试揭示了与社会心理压力相关的表型

社会威胁安全测试揭示了与社会心理压力相关的表型

社会威胁安全测试揭示了与社会心理压力相关的表型

训练实验兔改进常规饲养程序

训练实验兔改进常规饲养程序

训练实验兔改进常规饲养程序