The funding for this project was provided solely from institutional or departmental resources.

NOTE: The University of Nebraska Medical Center Institutional Review Board determined that our study did not constitute human subject research. The local IRB obtained ethical approval and waiver of informed consent. Complete anonymization of imaging data was done before analysis per the hospital de-identification protocol.
1. Data
<ol>
	<li>Obtain a CT scan capturing the anatomy of interest for the planned task trainer. Be careful to take into consideration the working volume limitations of the 3D printer used and required landmarks for procedural steps.</li>
	<li>If the scan is obtained in a Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine format (DICOM), convert to a Neuroimaging Informatics Technology Initiative (NiFTi)15 format (.nii).</li>
</ol>
2. Segmentation
<ol>
	<li>Use 3D Slicer software (http://www.slicer.org) to segment the CT images. Import the NIfTi file from Step 1.2 into 3D Slicer.</li>
	<li>Select the Segment Editor module to generate the segments needed to model the trainer.
	<ol>
		<li>Add one segment for the 1) Bone and 2) Tissue components of the task trainer. 
		NOTE: Development of some trainers, such as those used to train chest tube insertion, may require additional segments.</li>
		<li>Select segment 1) Bone. Using the Threshold Effect, change the intensity range until the defined &#34;window&#34; range identifies the Bone component of interest. 
		NOTE: For bone segments the usual range is between 100 and 175 HU (Hounsfield Units) to the available maximum value and for tissue, which is typically -256 HU to the available maximum.</li>
		<li>Use the Threshold function to highlight the 1) Bone component and apply it to the scan using the Apply command.</li>
		<li>Use the Scissors function to remove any areas of the scan not needed to create the task trainer. Use care to ensure that the bone marrow space remains hollow for IO trainers. 
		NOTE: This step is the first reduction of the segment of interest to the desired dimensions of the trainer. The build volume limitations of the 3D printer to be used should be considered here; however the segment may be further reduced in section 3.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Repeat steps 2.2.1-2.2.4 for the 2) Tissue component.</li>
	<li>Using the Segmentations module; export each component as an STL file.</li>
</ol>
3. 3D Modeling
<ol>
	<li>Use AutoDesk Meshmixer to crop the 3D segments further and reduce the resolution of each segment, in terms of the number of geometric elements, for optimal performance within Fusion360.
	<ol>
		<li>Confirm that imported STL files have the correct triangle normal orientation. Ensure the normals of each triangle point in the direction of the outer surface of the mesh. If the triangle orientation is incorrect, flip the triangle normal by performing the Select | Modify | Select All function and then the Select | Edit | Flip Normals function.</li>
		<li>Eliminate unwanted structures (e.g., unwanted segments of tissue or vasculature captured by the CT due to the use of contrast) of the imported STL Segments, and refine the models needed to create the task trainer. To refine the model by removing unwanted structures within the segments that may have been inadvertently included within the threshold range of the exported segment, use the Select operation, select the triangles on the undesired structures, then Edit | Discard.</li>
		<li>Following 3.1.2, use the Edit | Plane Cut tool to crop the model to fit within the confines of the 3D printer build volume. To reduce the computational overhead incurred due to excessive geometric resolution, reduce the number of triangles used to define the model to allow for optimal performance in Fusion360. Click on Select, double-click anywhere on the mesh to select the entire mesh, then Edit | Reduce. For Reduce Target, reduce to a Triangle Budget of under approximately 10,000 faces. 
		NOTE: The printer currently used by the authors has a maximum build volume of 250 x 210 x 210 mm; thus the model was cut to a maximum long-axis length of 220-230 mm to allow the mold to fit within the printer&#39;s build volume. The printer&#39;s build volume should dictate the long-axis length by making the model approximately 20-30 mm shorter. The geometry can easily be reduced to ~10K triangles without loss of clinically relevant detail to develop high-fidelity task trainers.</li>
		<li>Eliminate or reduce holes and surface irregularities using the Select tool. Once the triangles of the mesh around the defect are selected, use the command Select | Edit| Erase&#38;Fill to improve surface holes and irregularities.Export and save the finished models using the STL file type. 
		NOTE: The outer surface of the target bone for the interosseous line task trainers requires complete closing; otherwise, the melted tissue media will enter the marrow space and degrade the task trainer performance.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Use AutoDesk Fusion360, and import the bone and tissue models by adding the .STL files into the workspace as a mesh using the Insert | Insert Mesh command.
	<ol>
		<li>Convert the imported meshes into BRep solids by disabling the Fusion360 timeline and reducing the number of triangles in the target mesh to &#60;10,000.Select the imported Mesh Body and right-click. Choose the Mesh to BRep option. After the meshes have been converted to BReps solids, resume the Fusion360 timeline.</li>
		<li>Modify the solid to create the Task Trainer&#39;s mold by splitting the rectangular solid along the long axis of the Tissue BRep. 
		NOTE: The mold is created around the Tissue BRep by using the sketch feature to build a cube or rectangular solid that encompasses the Tissue solid. The mold size should be modified to meet the maximum build volume of the selected 3D printer. As the mold is split in two, the longest dimension printed may not be the final mold&#39;s largest dimension as they are joined.</li>
		<li>Select 2-3 locations for support pins, and place the pre-designed assembly group components to fix the task trainer&#39;s bones. Make sure that the locations selected for the support pins have an ample support structure in the bone around the head of the pin. 
		NOTE: The bone around the pin head selected does not need to be perfectly uniform as the assembly group also contains a solid cylindrical support structure, which will be fused with the bone. This structure adequately supports the head of the pin and preserves correct anatomic placement of the bones within the tissue media.</li>
		<li>Import and position a bone plug onto the open marrow space of the Bone BRep to prevent tissue media from entering the marrow space, and keep the simulated bone marrow from draining out.</li>
		<li>Generate an opening (typically 4-6 cm in diameter) through the molds in the space represented by the Tissue BRep solid to permit pouring the liquid tissue media into the mold.</li>
		<li>Once the components of the pre-designed assembly groups are positioned to fix the bones in space, perform Boolean Combine functions to either add or cut the various assembly groups into the models.
		<ol>
			<li>Perform a mirror of the objects before step 3.2.6 to make the task trainer for the ipsilateral side. Repeat steps 3.2.3-3.2.5 before 3.2.6.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Export the final components for printing. Select the desired body within the workspace and generate an STL file via right-click | Save As STL.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
4. 3D Printing
<ol>
	<li>Using Simplify 3D, position the STL file on the bed of the 3D printer so that the slicing program may generate the GCODE required to print the item. Print the components with Poly-lactic Acid (PLA) 3D printer media filament using a 0.4 mm nozzle at a hot end temperature of 210 &#176;C. Make sure that the settings utilize 4 top and bottom layers and 3 perimeter shells.</li>
	<li>Orient the bones vertically to minimize the required support material within the marrow cavity. Print using a raft, 0.2 mm layer height, 20% infill, and full support material (from the print bed and within the print). When printing the tissue molds, orient the mold components with the tissue surface facing up. Print the tissue molds without a raft, 0.3 mm layer height, 15% infill, and full support material.</li>
	<li>Arrange the support pins and other components to minimize support material-print all pin support parts with a raft, 0.2 mm layer height, and 20% infill. Print the threaded components without support material at a reduced speed, to maximize the fidelity of the thread structures.</li>
	<li>Once each component&#39;s parameters are selected, prepare and export the GCODE file generated by Simplify 3D to an SD card.Using a Prusa i3 MK3, select the saved GCODE file from the SD card and print with 1.75mm PLA 3D printer media filament.</li>
</ol>
5. Assembly
<ol>
	<li>Prepare the tissue medium. 
	NOTE: The trainee&#39;s current level of skill mastery may dictate whether opaque or transparent tissue medium is required. Transparent medium allows the trainee to visually track their progress during IO insertion and more easily identify bony landmarks, while opaque medium better simulates actual clinical experience.
	<ol>
		<li>Measure the following components to be used to create the tissue media, and set aside (these quantities may be scaled as needed) 260 g of unflavored gelatin; if required, 140 g of finely ground psyllium husk fiber, orange-flavored, sugar-free (omit this step to create a transparent medium); 42 g of 4% w/v chlorhexidine. 
		NOTE: Psyllium husk fiber may be used to make an opaque medium. This component should be added immediately after the gelatin if an opaque medium is desired16.</li>
		<li>Heat 1000 mL of water (tap is acceptable) to 85 &#176;C.Add the water to a mixing container several times larger than the volume of ingredients, such as an 18.9 L bucket.
		<ol>
			<li>While vigorously mixing the tissue medium solution, add the gelatin, psyllium husk fiber, and chlorhexidine solution to the water, in order, and wait before adding the next ingredient after the previous one is incorporated. 
			NOTE: Do not add psyllium husk fiber if making transparent medium.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Heat the mixture in a 71 &#176;C water bath for a minimum of 4 h to allow the bubbles to dissipate from the solution. Place the mixing container in the hot water bath directly, or transfer the mixture to a separate container, such as plastic storage bags.</li>
		<li>Prepare the tissue medium for pouring into the assembled mold. Ensure that the mixture is homogeneous and fluid. Maintain the temperature of the mixture at 46 &#176;C. 
		NOTE: If the tissue medium is not immediately needed, it may be stored at 4 &#176;C or -20 &#176;C within a storage container until needed.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Prepare the simulated bone marrow solution. 
	NOTE: The simulated bone marrow solution may be prepared in advance and stored in a covered container at room temperature until ready for use.
	<ol>
		<li>Measure and thoroughly mix 100 g of cool water (tap is fine); 100 g of ultrasound gel; and 5 mL of red food coloring (optional, used to improve simulation). Ensure that the final product is thick but fluid enough to transfer quickly.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Secure the bone to the bottom of the mold, and assemble the mold.
	<ol>
		<li>Spray each side of the mold&#39;s inner surfaces with a non-silicone-based releasing agent, such as non-stick cooking spray.Secure the bone using the support pins to maintain the correct position within the tissue space. Secure the bones/pins to the bottom of the mold.</li>
		<li>Align the top of the mold to the bottom portion, and secure the two halves of the mold together. Verify the bone plug is in position to prevent tissue medium entering the marrow space during pouring.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Position the mold such that the opening is facing up, and pour the 46 &#176;C tissue medium into the mold&#39;s cavity.Remedy any leakage of the tissue medium from the mold using an inverted air duster canister by directly spraying the warm tissue medium with the canister to cool it quickly.Transfer the filled mold to a 4 &#176;C refrigerator for a minimum of 6 h, or until the tissue medium has set.</li>
	<li>Disassemble the mold, and remove the task trainer and the support pins.Remove the bone plug, fill the marrow space with simulated &#39;bone marrow&#39; created in 5.2, and replace the bone plug. Place the task trainers in a plastic storage bag, and store the assembly at either 4 &#176;C or -20 &#176;C until needed for training.</li>
</ol>
6. Task training
<ol>
	<li>Remove the task trainer from storage and allow it to reach room temperature. If not already in place, add simulated bone marrow material from step 5.2 per instruction in 5.5. 
	NOTE: Allowing the trainer to warm to room temperature improves the simulation experience.</li>
	<li>Perform training on the task trainers. Instruct the trainees to place IO needles (Figure 2A), and aspirate simulated bone marrow (Figure 2B) as per the IO line placement&#39;s usual steps.</li>
	<li>Following training, disassemble the task trainers to reclaim tissue, the medium, and the bones. 
	NOTE: After manipulation, the bones of the IO trainer will have holes created by insertion of the IO line canula. These holes may be either filled with PLA using a handheld 3D printer pen, or alternately the bones may be discarded.</li>
	<li>Reassemble and reuse reclaimed materials for subsequent training as per section 5.Alternatively, melt the tissue medium down, reclaim per 5.1.4, and store at either 4 &#176;C or -20 &#176;C, if not immediately needed.</li>
</ol>

<ol>
	<li>Farrow, D. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Reducing+the+risks+of+military+aircrew+training+through+simulation+technology.">Reducing the risks of military aircrew training through simulation technology.</a> Performance and Instruction. 21 (2), 13-18 (1982).</li><li>Lateef, F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Simulation-based+learning:+Just+like+the+real+thing.">Simulation-based learning: Just like the real thing.</a> Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, Shock. 3 (4), 348-352 (2010).</li><li>Gaba, D. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Crisis+resource+management+and+teamwork+training+in+anaesthesia.">Crisis resource management and teamwork training in anaesthesia.</a> British Journal of Anaesthesia. 105 (1), 3-6 (2010).</li><li>Al-Elq, A. H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Simulation-based+medical+teaching+and+learning.">Simulation-based medical teaching and learning.</a> Journal of Family &amp; Community Medicine. 17 (1), 35-40 (2010).</li><li>Hays, R. T., Singer, M. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=.">.</a> Simulation fidelity in training system design: Bridging the gap between reality and training. , (2012).</li><li>Green, M., Tariq, R., Green, P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Improving+patient+safety+through+simulation+training+in+anesthesiology:+Where+are+we.">Improving patient safety through simulation training in anesthesiology: Where are we.</a> Anesthesiology Research and Practice. , 4237523 (2016).</li><li>Olympio, M. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Simulation+saves+lives.">Simulation saves lives.</a> American Society of Anesthesiologists Newsletter. , 15-19 (2001).</li><li>Murphy, M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Simulation-based+multidisciplinary+team+training+decreases+time+to+critical+operations+for+trauma+patients.">Simulation-based multidisciplinary team training decreases time to critical operations for trauma patients.</a> Injury. 49 (5), 953-958 (2018).</li><li>Jensen, A. R., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Simulation-based+training+is+associated+with+lower+risk-adjusted+mortality+in+ACS+pediatric+TQIP+centers.">Simulation-based training is associated with lower risk-adjusted mortality in ACS pediatric TQIP centers.</a> Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 87 (4), 841-848 (2019).</li><li>Gupta, A., Peckler, B., Schoken, D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Introduction+of+hi-fidelity+simulation+techniques+as+an+ideal+teaching+tool+for+upcoming+emergency+medicine+and+trauma+residency+programs+in+India.">Introduction of hi-fidelity simulation techniques as an ideal teaching tool for upcoming emergency medicine and trauma residency programs in India.</a> Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock. 1 (1), 15-18 (2008).</li><li>Risser, D. T., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=The+potential+for+improved+teamwork+to+reduce+medical+errors+in+the+emergency+department.">The potential for improved teamwork to reduce medical errors in the emergency department.</a> Annals of Emergency Medicine. 34 (3), 373-383 (1999).</li><li>Shapiro, M. J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Simulation+based+teamwork+training+for+emergency+department+staff:+Does+it+improve+clinical+team+performance+when+added+to+an+existing+didactic+teamwork+curriculum.">Simulation based teamwork training for emergency department staff: Does it improve clinical team performance when added to an existing didactic teamwork curriculum.</a> Quality and Safety in Health Care. 13 (6), 417-421 (2004).</li><li>Schebesta, K., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Degrees+of+reality:+Airway+anatomy+of+high-fidelity+human+patient+simulators+and+airway+trainers.">Degrees of reality: Airway anatomy of high-fidelity human patient simulators and airway trainers.</a> Anesthesiology. 116 (6), 1204-1209 (2012).</li><li>Crofts, J. F., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Training+for+shoulder+dystocia:+A+trial+of+simulation+using+low-fidelity+and+high-fidelity+mannequins.">Training for shoulder dystocia: A trial of simulation using low-fidelity and high-fidelity mannequins.</a> Obstetrics and Gynecology. 108 (6), 1477-1485 (2006).</li><li>Cox, R. W., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+(sort+of)+new+image+data+format+standard:+NiFTI-1.">A (sort of) new image data format standard: NiFTI-1.</a> 10th Annual Meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping. , 22 (2004).</li><li>Bude, R., Adler, R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=An+easily+made,+low-cost,+tissue-like+ultrasound+phantom+material.">An easily made, low-cost, tissue-like ultrasound phantom material.</a> Journal of Clinical Ultrasound. 23 (4), 271-273 (1995).</li><li>Fisher, J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Clinical+skills+temporal+degradation+assessment+in+undergraduate+medical+education.">Clinical skills temporal degradation assessment in undergraduate medical education.</a> Journal of Advances in Medical Education &amp; Professionalism. 6 (1), 1-5 (2018).</li><li>Buzink, S. N., Goossens, R. H., Schoon, E. J., de Ridder, H., Jakimowicz, J. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Do+basic+psychomotor+skills+transfer+between+different+image-based+procedures.">Do basic psychomotor skills transfer between different image-based procedures.</a> World Journal of Surgery. 34 (5), 933-940 (2010).</li></ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

In this protocol we detail a 3D task trainer's development process to train the infrequently performed and life-saving procedure of IO line placement. This self-guided protocol uses 3D printing to produce the bulk of the model structures, while the remainder of the components used to assemble the task trainer are ubiquitous, easily obtainable, and non-toxic materials that may be reclaimed and reused. The 3D task trainer is low-cost and requires minimum expertise to create and assemble. We have successfully used our 3D IO...

Patient care competency of procedural skills is a critical component for developing trainees in civilian and military healthcare1,2 environments. Procedural skills development is particularly important for procedure-intensive specialties such as anesthesiology3 and front-line medical personnel. Task trainers may be used to rehearse numerous procedures with skill levels ranging from those of a first-year medical student or medical technician to a senior resident or fellow. While many medical procedures require significant training to complete, the task presented here-placement of an interosseous (IO) line-is straightforward and requires less technical skill. Successful placement of an IO line can be accomplished after a relatively short period of training. The use of simulation during medical training, which includes the use of task trainers, is recognized as a tool to gain technical procedural skills through the repetition and the rehearsal of a clinical procedure in a safe, low-stress environment, before ultimately performing the procedure on patients2,4,5.
Understandably so, simulation training in medical education environments has become widely accepted and appears to be a mainstay, despite the paucity of data regarding any impact on patient outcomes6,7. Additionally, recent publications demonstrate that simulation improves team performance and patient outcomes as the result of improved team dynamics and decision-making. Still, there is little data to suggest that simulation improves the time or success rate to perform critical, life-saving procedures8,9 suggesting that simulation is complex and multifaceted in the education of health care providers. In patients where standard intravenous access is not possible or indicated, IO line placement may be used to achieve vascular access quickly, requiring minimal skill. Timely and successful performance of this procedure is critical, particularly in the perioperative environment or a trauma scenario10,11,12. Because IO line placement is an infrequently performed procedure in the perioperative area and can be a life-saving procedure, training in a non-clinical environment is critical. An anatomically accurate task trainer specific to IO line placement is an ideal tool for offering predictable training frequency and skills development for this procedure.
Although widely used, currently available commercial task trainers suffer from several significant drawbacks. First, task trainers that allow for multiple attempts of a procedure are costly, not only for the initial purchase of the task trainer but also for replenishing the replaceable parts such as silicone skin patches. The result is often infrequently replaced parts, leaving prominent landmarks that provide the trainee a suboptimal training experience; patients will not come pre-marked where one should do the procedure. Another drawback is that the high cost of traditional task trainers can result in limited access by users when the devices are &#39;locked up&#39; in protected storage locations to prevent loss or damage to the devices. The result is requiring more rigorously and less available scheduled practice time, limiting their use can certainly make unscheduled training difficult. Finally, most trainers are considered low-fidelity5,13,14 and use only representative anatomy, potentially leading to inappropriate psychomotor skills development or training scars. Low-fidelity trainers also make the thorough assessment of skill acquisition, mastery, and degradation very difficult as training on a low-fidelity device may not adequately mimic the actual real-world procedure.
Representative anatomy also impedes the proper evaluation of the acquisition and mastery of psychomotor skills. Moreover, assessing the transfer of psychomotor skills between simulated medical environments to patient care becomes nearly impossible if some of the psychomotor skills are not reflected in the clinical task. This results in the prevention of consensus on the ability of medical simulation and training to affect patient outcomes. To overcome the challenges of cost, anatomical accuracy, and access, we have developed a low-cost, high-fidelity IO line task trainer. The task trainer is designed from an actual patient&#39;s CT scan, resulting in accurate anatomy (Figure 1). The materials used are ubiquitous and easy to obtain, with components that are relatively easy to reclaim. Compared to many other commercially available trainers, the modest cost of the task trainer design described here dramatically reduces the desire to sequester the trainers in a less accessible, protected location and makes multiple repetitions without leading landmarks possible.

<table border="1" fo:keep-together.within-page="1" fo:keep-with-next.within-page="always">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>3D printer filament, poly-lactic acid (PLA), 1.75 mm</td>
			<td>N/A / Hatchbox</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Base for 3D printing molds, bone structures, and bone / mold hardware</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>3D printer, Original Prusa i3 MK3</td>
			<td>Prusa</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>To print molds, bone structures, and bone / mold hardware</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>bleach, household (6% sodium hypochlorite)</td>
			<td>Clorox</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Animicrobial additive for tissue media</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>bolts, 1/4&#8221;, flat / countersunk or round head, various lengths</td>
			<td>N/A</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Hardware used to hold mold casing halves together during casting</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Bucket, 5 gallon, plastic</td>
			<td>N/A</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>To hold tissue media during media preparation</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>chlorhexidine, 4% solution w/v</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Animicrobial additive for tissue media</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>drill, household 3/8&#8217; chuck</td>
			<td>N/A</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>To stir tissue media during media preparation</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>food coloring, red (optional)</td>
			<td>N/A</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Coloring additive for simulated bone marrow</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>gelatin, unflavored</td>
			<td>Knox</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Base for tissue media</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>hex nuts, 1/4&#8221;</td>
			<td>N/A</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Hardware used to hold mold casing halves together during casting</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Non-stick cooking spray</td>
			<td>N/A</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Mold releasing agent</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>plastic bags, ziplock</td>
			<td>Ziplock</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>To store tissue media</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>psyllium husk fiber, finely ground, orange flavored, sugar free (optional)</td>
			<td>Procter &#38; Gamble</td>
			<td>Metamucil</td>
			<td>Opacity / Echogenicity additive for tissue media</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>screwdriver, flat / Phillips (matching bolt hardware)</td>
			<td>N/A</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>To tighten mold casing hardware</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>silicone gasket cord stock, 3mm, round, various lengths</td>
			<td>N/A</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Gasket media for mold casings</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>spray adhesive, Super 77 (optional)</td>
			<td>3M</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Agent used to improve bed adhesion during 3D printing</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>stirring paddle / rod</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>To stir tissue media during media preparation</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>turkey baster, household, ## mL</td>
			<td>N/A</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>To inject simulated bone marrow into bone marrow cavity</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>ultrasound gel</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Base for simulated bone marrow</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>water, tap</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Used in both tissue media and simulated bone marrow</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>

creation of a high-fidelity, low-cost, intraosseous line placement task trainer via 3d printing

The description of procedural task trainers includes their use as a training tool to hone technical skills through repetition and rehearsal of procedures in a safe environment before ultimately performing the procedure on a patient. Many procedural task trainers available to date suffer from several drawbacks, including unrealistic anatomy and the tendency to develop user-created &#39;landmarks&#39; after the trainer tissue undergoes repeated manipulations, potentially leading to inappropriate psychomotor skill development. To ameliorate these drawbacks, a process was created to produce a high-fidelity procedural task trainer, created from anatomy obtained from computed tomography (CT) scans, that utilize ubiquitous three-dimensional (3D) printing technology and off-the-shelf commodity supplies.
This method includes creating a 3D printed tissue mold capturing the tissue structure surrounding the skeletal element of interest to encase the bony skeletal structure suspended within the tissue, which is also 3D printed. A tissue medium mixture, which approximates tissue in both high-fidelity geometry and tissue density, is then poured into a mold and allowed to set. After a task trainer has been used to practice a procedure, such as intraosseous line placement, the tissue media, molds, and bones are reclaimable and may be reused to create a fresh task trainer, free of puncture sites and manipulation defects, for use in subsequent training sessions.

Following the protocol, the modeling of the task trainer utilized a CT scan of a de-identified patient. Segmentation of the CT images utilized 3D Slicer software and Auto Meshmixer for 3D modeling. For 3D printing, both 3D Simplify and the Prusa i3 MK3 were used (Figure 1). Subsequently, we completed the assembly of the 3D-printed parts, prepared the tissue media mixture, and poured the media mixture into the assembled task trainer mold. Following a training period with the task trainer, the...

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Creation of a High-Fidelity, Low-Cost, Intraosseous Line Placement Task Trainer via 3D Printing at JoVE.com

Creation of a High-Fidelity, Low-Cost, Intraosseous Line Placement Task Trainer via 3D Printing

We describe a procedure to process computed tomography (CT) scans into high-fidelity, reclaimable, and low-cost procedural task trainers. The CT scan identification processes, export, segmentation, modeling, and 3D printing are all described, along with the issues and lessons learned in the process.

The description of procedural task trainers includes their use as a training tool to hone technical skills through repetition and rehearsal of procedures ...

creation-high-fidelity-low-cost-intraosseous-line-placement-task

Universidad de Cartagena UDEC

Research

JoVE Journal

Medicine

1.9K Views.  University of Nebraska Medical Center. We describe a procedure to process computed tomography (CT) scans into high-fidelity, reclaimable, and low-cost procedural task trainers. The CT scan identification processes, export, segmentation, modeling, and 3D printing are all described, along with the issues and lessons learned in the process. 

Video: Creation of a High-Fidelity, Low-Cost, Intraosseous Line Placement Task Trainer via 3D Printing

Creation of Abdominal Adhesions in Mice

Abdominal adhesions consist of fibrotic tissue that forms in the peritoneal space in response to an inflammatory insult, typically surgery or intraabdominal infection. The precise mechanisms underlying adhesion formation are poorly understood. Many compounds and physical barriers have been tested for their ability to prevent adhesions after surgery with varying levels of success. The mouse and rat are important models for the study of abdominal adhesions. Several different techniques for the creation of adhesions in the mouse and rat exist in the literature. Here we describe a protocol utilizing abrasion of the cecum with sandpaper and sutures placed in the right abdominal sidewall. The mouse is anesthetized and the abdomen is prepped. A midline laparotomy is created and the cecum is identified. Sandpaper is used to gently abrade the surface of the cecum. Next, several figure-of-eight sutures are placed into the peritoneum of the right abdominal sidewall. The abdominal cavity is irrigated, a small amount of starch is applied, and the incision is closed. We have found that this technique produces the most consistent adhesions with the lowest mortality rate.

Abdominal adhesions that form after surgery are a major cause of pain, infertility, and hospitalization and reoperation for small bowel obstruction. Our surgical procedure for creating abdominal adhesions in mice is a reliable tool to study the mechanisms underlying the formation of adhesions.

Abdominal adhesions consist of fibrotic tissue that forms in the peritoneal space in response to an inflammatory insult, typically surgery or ...

Expression of Exogenous Cytokine in Patient-derived Xenografts via Injection with a Cytokine-transduced Stromal Cell Line

Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mice are produced by transplanting human cells into immune deficient mice. These models are an important tool for studying the mechanisms of normal and malignant hematopoiesis and are the gold standard for identifying effective chemotherapies for many malignancies. PDX models are possible because many of the mouse cytokines also act on human cells. However, this is not the case for all cytokines, including many that are critical for studying normal and malignant hematopoiesis in human cells. Techniques that engineer mice to produce human cytokines (transgenic and knock-in models) require significant expense before the usefulness of the model has been demonstrated. Other techniques are labor intensive (injection of recombinant cytokine or lentivirus) and in some cases require high levels of technical expertise (hydrodynamic injection of DNA). This report describes a simple method for generating PDX mice that have exogenous human cytokine (TSLP, thymic stromal lymphopoietin) via weekly intraperitoneal injection of stroma that have been transduced to overexpress this cytokine. Use of this method provides an in vivo source of continuous cytokine production that achieves physiological levels of circulating human cytokine in the mouse. Plasma levels of human cytokine can be varied based on the number of stromal cells injected, and cytokine production can be initiated at any point in the experiment. This method also includes cytokine-negative control mice that are similarly produced, but through intraperitoneal injection of stroma transduced with a control vector. We have previously demonstrated that leukemia cells harvested from TSLP-expressing PDX, as compared to control PDX, exhibit a gene expression pattern more like the original patient sample. Together the cytokine-producing and cytokine-negative PDX mice produced by this method provide a model system that we have used successfully to study the role of TSLP in normal and malignant hematopoiesis.

Described here is a method for producing exogenous cytokine in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mice via weekly intraperitoneal injection of a cytokine-transduced stromal cell line. This method broadens the utility of PDX and provides the option for transient or sustained exogenous cytokine delivery in a multitude of PDX models.

Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mice are produced by transplanting human cells into immune deficient mice. These models are an important tool for studying ...

Three-Dimensional Printing of a Complex Aortic Anomaly

Complex congenital aortic anomalies include diverse types of malformations that may be clinically asymptomatic or present with respiratory or esophageal symptoms. These anomalies may be associated with other congenital heart diseases. It is hard to identify the accurate anatomic vessel location from two-dimensional imaging data, such as computed tomography. As an additive manufacturing method, three-dimensional (3-D) printing can covert the acquired imaging data into 3-D physical models. This protocol describes the procedure for modeling the volumetric DICOM imaging into 3-D data and printing it as an anatomically realistic 3-D model. Using this model, surgeons can identify the vessel location of complex aortic anomalies, which is helpful for pre-operative planning and intra-operative guidance.

Here, we present a protocol to use three dimensional printed models for pre-operative planning and intra-operative reorganization of complicated vascular locations when handling a congenital aortic anomaly.

Complex congenital aortic anomalies include diverse types of malformations that may be clinically asymptomatic or present with respiratory or esophageal ...

Creation of Colonic Anastomosis in Mice

Intestinal anastomoses are commonly performed in both elective and emergent operations. Even so, anastomotic leaks are a highly feared complications of colonic surgeries and can occur in up to 26% of surgical anastomoses, with mortality being up to 39% for patients with such a leak. Currently, there remains a paucity of data detailing the cellular mechanisms of anastomotic healing. Devising preventative strategies and treatment modalities for anastomotic leak could be greatly potentiated by a better understanding of appropriate anastomotic healing.
A murine model is ideal as previous studies have shown that the murine anastomosis is the most clinically similar to the human case as compared with other animal models. We offer an easily reproducible murine model of colonic anastomosis in mice that will allow for further illustration of anastomotic healing.

Anastomotic leak or breakdown after surgery is a major cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Our surgery for creating a colonic anastomosis is a reliable and reproducible method for studying the healing mechanisms of anastomoses.

Intestinal anastomoses are commonly performed in both elective and emergent operations. Even so, anastomotic leaks are a highly feared complications of ...

Manufacture of a Multi-Purpose Low-Cost Animal Bench-Model for Teaching Tracheostomy

Tracheostomy is one of the most frequent procedures, performed through various techniques in the intensive care unit and emergency situations. Despite this, there is a lack of training on this procedure that affects its outcome, which is also dependent on operator's dexterity. Here, we take the specific training and simulation into consideration. This article aims to describe every step of the manufacture of a new multi-purpose low-cost animal bench-model, with the support of video and images, and to obtain an opinion about the quality of this model by administering a questionnaire to professionals with experience in the procedures. 
Ten experts in the technique were enrolled. The model scored an average of 3.45/5 for its anatomical realism; 4.75/5 for its usefulness as a training tool for simulation courses and assessments. The time necessary to build the model was 15 minutes, and the cost amounted to 10&#8364;. The animal bench-model was considered a very useful simulator for tracheostomy training and assessments. Therefore, it could be used as a tool for medical courses and residencies.

This article illustrates every step of the manufacture of a new multi-purpose low-cost animal bench-model for subglottic airway access management. All the procedures are shown in the video. The model's realism and its suitability for training the given clinical maneuvers were assessed by independent senior otolaryngologists and anesthesiologists.

Tracheostomy is one of the most frequent procedures, performed through various techniques in the intensive care unit and emergency situations. Despite ...

Multicolor 3D Printing of Complex Intracranial Tumors in Neurosurgery

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies offer the possibility of visualizing patient-specific pathologies in a physical model of correct dimensions. The model can be used for planning and simulating critical steps of a surgical approach. Therefore, it is important that anatomical structures such as blood vessels inside a tumor can be printed to be colored not only on their surface, but throughout their whole volume. During simulation this allows for the removal of certain parts (e.g., with a high-speed drill) and revealing internally located structures of a different color. Thus, diagnostic information from various imaging modalities (e.g., CT, MRI) can be combined in a single compact and tangible object.
However, preparation and printing of such a fully colored anatomical model remains a difficult task. Therefore, a step-by-step guide is provided, demonstrating the fusion of different cross-sectional imaging data sets, segmentation of anatomical structures, and creation of a virtual model. In a second step the virtual model is printed with volumetrically colored anatomical structures using a plaster-based color 3D binder jetting technique. This method allows highly accurate reproduction of patient-specific anatomy as shown in a series of 3D-printed petrous apex chondrosarcomas. Furthermore, the models created can be cut and drilled, revealing internal structures that allow for simulation of surgical procedures.

The protocol describes the fabrication of fully colored three-dimensional prints of patient-specific, anatomical skull models to be used for surgical simulation. The crucial steps of combining different imaging modalities, image segmentation, three-dimensional model extraction, and production of the prints are explained.

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies offer the possibility of visualizing patient-specific pathologies in a physical model of correct dimensions. ...

Combining Augmented Reality and 3D Printing to Display Patient Models on a Smartphone

Augmented reality (AR) has great potential in education, training, and surgical guidance in the medical field. Its combination with three-dimensional (3D) printing (3DP) opens new possibilities in clinical applications. Although these technologies have grown exponentially in recent years, their adoption by physicians is still limited, since they require extensive knowledge of engineering and software development. Therefore, the purpose of this protocol is to describe a step-by-step methodology enabling inexperienced users to create a smartphone app, which combines AR and 3DP for the visualization of anatomical 3D models of patients with a 3D-printed reference marker. The protocol describes how to create 3D virtual models of a patient&rsquo;s anatomy derived from 3D medical images. It then explains how to perform positioning of the 3D models with respect to marker references. Also provided are instructions for how to 3D print the required tools and models. Finally, steps to deploy the app are provided. The protocol is based on free and multi-platform software and can be applied to any medical imaging modality or patient. An alternative approach is described to provide automatic registration between a 3D-printed model created from a patient&rsquo;s anatomy and the projected holograms. As an example, a clinical case of a patient suffering from distal leg sarcoma is provided to illustrate the methodology. It is expected that this protocol will accelerate the adoption of AR and 3DP technologies by medical professionals.

Presented here is a method to design an augmented reality smartphone application for the visualization of anatomical three-dimensional models of patients using a 3D-printed reference marker.

Augmented reality (AR) has great potential in education, training, and surgical guidance in the medical field. Its combination with three-dimensional (3D) ...

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

We are in the midst of the 3D era in most aspects of life, and especially in medicine. The surgical discipline is one of the major players in the medical field using the constantly developing 3D planning and printing capabilities. Computer-assisted design (CAD) and computer assisted manufacturing (CAM) are used to describe the 3D planning and manufacturing of the product. The planning and manufacturing of 3D surgical guides and reconstruction implants is performed almost exclusively by engineers. As technology advances and software interfaces become more user-friendly, it raises a question regarding the possibility of transferring the planning and manufacturing to the clinician. The reasons for such a shift are clear: the surgeon has the idea of what he wants to design, and he also knows what is feasible and could be used in the operating room. It allows him to be prepared for any scenario/unexpected results during the operation and allows the surgeon to be creative and express his new ideas using the CAD software. The purpose of this method is to provide clinicians with the ability to create their own surgical guides and reconstruction implants. In this manuscript, a detailed protocol will provide a simple method for segmentation using segmentation software and implant planning using a 3D design software. Following the segmentation and stl file production using segmentation software, the clinician could create a simple patient specific reconstruction plate or a more complex plate with a cradle for bone graft positioning. Surgical guides can be created for accurate resection, hole preparation for proper reconstruction plate positioning or for bone graft harvesting and re-contouring. A case of lower jaw reconstruction following plate fracture and nonunion healing of a trauma sustained injury is detailed.

This protocol describes the use of 3D planning and printing for reconstruction of bony defects. We use segmentation tools to create 3D models followed by 3D design software to create patient specific implants for reconstruction purposes concomitant to ablative surgery or as a second stage.

We are in the midst of the 3D era in most aspects of life, and especially in medicine. The surgical discipline is one of the major players in the medical ...

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Technological advancements in surgical planning and patient-specific implants are constantly evolving. One can either adopt the technology to achieve better results, even in the less experienced hand, or continue without it. As technology develops and becomes more user-friendly, we believe it is time to allow the surgeon the option to plan his/her operations and create his/her own patient-specific surgical guides and fixation plates allowing him full control over the process. We present here a protocol for 3D planning of the operation followed by 3D planning and printing of surgical guides and patient-specific fixation implants. During this process we use two commercial computer-assisted design (CAD) software. We also use a fused deposition&#160;modeling printer for the surgical guides and a selective laser sintering printer for the titanium patient-specific fixation implants. The process includes computed tomography (CT) imaging acquisition, 3D segmentation of the skull and facial bones from the CT, 3D planning of the operations, 3D planning of patient-specific fixation implant according to the final position of the bones, 3D planning of surgical guides for performing an accurate osteotomy and preparing the bone for the fixation plates, and 3D printing of the surgical guides and the patient-specific fixation plates. The advantages of the method include full control over the surgery, planned osteotomies and fixation plates, significant reduction in price, reduction in operation duration, superior performance and highly accurate results. Limitations include the need to master the CAD programs.

As technology develops and becomes more user-friendly, planning of operations and patient-specific surgical guides and fixation plates should be performed by the surgeon. We present a protocol for 3D planning of orthognathic skeletal movements and 3D planning and printing of patient-specific fixation plates and surgical guides.

Technological advancements in surgical planning and patient-specific implants are constantly evolving. One can either adopt the technology to achieve ...

Low-Cost Single-Port (LoCoSP) Device for a Transcervical Approach in Minimally Invasive Transhiatal Esophagectomy

Esophagectomy remains the preferred option to achieve curative treatment in advanced esophageal cancer, but the choice of surgical approach remains controversial. A transthoracic approach may improve lymph node dissection, but it has considerable morbidity and respiratory complications. Transhiatal access has been demonstrated as an efficient means of minimizing post-operative complications. Minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy may reduce operative trauma and morbidity as well as enhance postoperative recovery with no compromise in cancer recurrence or survival. Nevertheless, it has a technical limitation in terms of cervical esophagus dissection. Thus, a low-cost single-port device was developed to complete upper mediastinal dissection by a transcervical approach during minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy. This device uses a nasogastric tube, a number-eight sterile glove, a sterile sponge, and 3 permanent 5-mm trocars. The step-by-step process of transhiatal esophagectomy and the development of this device are described. This technique allows for the dissection of the upper mediastinum, as well as the esophagus over the aortic arch and behind the superior portion of the trachea. The harvesting of lymph nodes along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve and paratracheals was improved.

Low-Cost Single-Port LoCoSP Device for a Transcervical Approach in Minimally Invasive Transhiatal Esophagectomy

Here, we describe a step-by-step description of transhiatal esophagectomy and the development of a low-cost single-port device for a transcervical approach in a minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy.

Esophagectomy remains the preferred option to achieve curative treatment in advanced esophageal cancer, but the choice of surgical approach remains ...